GOP Doesn’t Want to Govern and Democrats Can’t

Both parties bloody their brands with 3 weeks of dysfunction.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 17: The early morning sun begins to rise behind the U.S. Capitol on December 17, 2010 in Washington, DC. Later today the Senate is slated to debate the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ron Fournier
Oct. 25, 2013, 8:15 a.m.

In the broad­est pos­sible sense, this is what happened in “This Town” this month:

Re­pub­lic­ans un­der­cut the eco­nomy and dam­aged their brand. Amer­ic­ans jus­ti­fi­ably blamed the Re­pub­lic­an Party for the debt-ceil­ing fight and gov­ern­ment shut­down, which Stand­ard & Poors said cost the eco­nomy about $24 bil­lion. The de­bacle af­fected the pub­lic’s over­all opin­ion of Re­pub­lic­ans: Only 32 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans say they have a fa­vor­able im­pres­sion of the GOP, ac­cord­ing to a Wash­ing­ton Post poll, com­pared to 46 per­cent for the Demo­crat­ic Party.

Bey­ond the mo­ment, the brinks­man­ship cut against a core Re­pub­lic­an mis­sion: To min­im­ize the im­port­ance of gov­ern­ment.  While most Amer­ic­ans were not af­fected by shuttered fed­er­al of­fices, pub­lic parks, re­search pro­jects and com­munity pro­grams, they were re­minded of why gov­ern­ment mat­ters. They might even ap­pre­ci­ate it a bit more.

A second brand­ing prob­lem: Re­pub­lic­ans bill them­selves as the fisc­ally re­spons­ible gov­ern­ing co­ali­tion. That’s a hard claim to make when a mus­cu­lar minor­ity of your party wants to de­fault on the na­tion’s debt.

Demo­crats un­der­cut their goal of uni­ver­sal health care cov­er­age and dam­aged their brand. After dec­ades of ad­voc­at­ing for health care re­form, the Demo­crat­ic Party seems in­cap­able so far of im­ple­ment­ing it. An on­line fed­er­al mar­ket­place (for people liv­ing in states that did not cre­ate their own health in­sur­ance pools) launched Oct. 1, and it’s a bust. Obama and his team are try­ing to de­flect re­spons­ib­il­ity by blam­ing oth­ers (web­site de­velopers, the me­dia, the GOP etc.) and min­im­iz­ing the dam­age. Their re­frain: “Obama­care is more than just a web­site.” But even journ­al­ists sym­path­et­ic to Obama, such as Ezra Klein of the Wash­ing­ton Post, un­der­stand that the web­site is cru­cial to the law’s suc­cess and must be fixed.

Launch­ing a web­site is the easy part. Demo­crats still must con­vince young Amer­ic­ans to buy health in­sur­ance they don’t think they need — and deal with blow­back from count­less Amer­ic­ans who will pay more and get less in the new mar­ket­place.

If Re­pub­lic­ans helped Amer­ic­ans ap­pre­ci­ate gov­ern­ment, Obama­care is caus­ing Amer­ic­ans to ques­tion it. The dec­ades-old core ar­gu­ment of the Demo­crat­ic Party is that gov­ern­ment can do good things ef­fi­ciently. Botch­ing health care re­form would be a ma­jor set­back to that brand.  

NBC News’ “First Read” summed up the situ­ation this way: “The Obama White House and Demo­crats have a polit­ic­al prob­lem when it comes to gov­ern­ing (see the Obama­care web­site), while Re­pub­lic­ans have a polit­ic­al prob­lem be­cause they don’t want to gov­ern (see the shut­down). And both sides have used the oth­er party’s prob­lems to mask their own.”

Voters, mean­while, are turn­ing against both parties. The pub­lic’s faith in Con­gress, the pres­id­ency and vir­tu­ally every polit­ic­al in­sti­tu­tion is at near-re­cord lows. Sixty-per­cent of Amer­ic­ans want every mem­ber of Con­gress tossed from of­fice. More people dis­ap­prove of Obama’s per­form­ance than ap­prove.

There is no reas­on for Amer­ic­ans to think the GOP will de­cide to gov­ern, or that Demo­crats will learn to gov­ern well.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
9 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×