First-Ever Senate Vote on Tap to Ban Workplace Discrimination Against Gays

CHICAGO - JULY 21: A man smokes a cigarette outside a Marriott Courtyard hotel near the Magnificent Mile shopping district July 21, 2006 in Chicago, Illinois. Beginning in September Marriott International will ban smoking in all 2,300 of its hotels. 
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
See more stories about...
Fawn Johnson
Oct. 29, 2013, 6:07 p.m.

How do you cel­eb­rate a bill that won’t be­come a law? That’s the ques­tion fa­cing gay-rights ad­voc­ates over the next sev­er­al weeks as they an­ti­cip­ate a his­tor­ic Sen­ate vote on le­gis­la­tion to ban work­place dis­crim­in­a­tion based on sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion.

The vote could take place as early as next week, and it will def­in­itely oc­cur be­fore Thanks­giv­ing. It will mark the first time the Sen­ate has voted on the nondis­crim­in­a­tion pro­pos­al that has been in the works for 20 years. Its sup­port­ers are op­tim­ist­ic that it will pass.

It is highly un­likely that the GOP-led House will take up a Sen­ate-passed gay-rights bill, giv­en the op­pos­i­tion of tea-party and so­cial con­ser­vat­ives. (House GOP staffers say they can’t spec­u­late on the House’s ac­tions un­til the Sen­ate ac­tu­ally passes the bill. Fair enough.)

Re­gard­less of what the House does, gay-rights ad­voc­ates have two goals for the up­com­ing Sen­ate vote: The first is to get law­makers used to vot­ing on gay rights. They need prac­tice. “There are very few mem­bers of Con­gress that have taken votes on gay is­sues,” said Fred Sainz, vice pres­id­ent of com­mu­nic­a­tions for the Hu­man Rights Cam­paign. “The more you get to sit with an is­sue, the more you’re lob­bied on an is­sue, the more com­fort­able you be­come with it, the more you see that it’s not the apo­ca­lypse.”

The second aim of the Sen­ate vote is to give Pres­id­ent Obama an open­ing to ban sexu­al-ori­ent­a­tion dis­crim­in­a­tion by fed­er­al con­tract­ors. That ex­ec­ut­ive op­tion is al­ways open to him, but it be­comes easi­er polit­ic­ally to do it if it ap­pears that Con­gress will not act. “We have cer­tainly been ask­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion to take ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion,” said Sta­cey Long, pub­lic-policy dir­ect­or for the Na­tion­al Gay and Les­bi­an Task Force. “If it passes the Sen­ate, it does sort of leave the ques­tion on [the White House’s] door­step to take ac­tion.”

No mat­ter what, the Sen­ate vote on the Em­ploy­ment Non-Dis­crim­in­a­tion Act is a big deal. It is the first time the Sen­ate has weighed in on the is­sue of sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion in the work­place, and it is the first bill in either cham­ber that cov­ers trans­gender in­di­vidu­als. The House passed a ver­sion of ENDA in 2007, which was also a big deal, but it did not cov­er trans­gender em­ploy­ees. The Sen­ate bill does.

Sen­ate pas­sage is likely but not a slam dunk. The bill’s spon­sors are still lack­ing a firm com­mit­ment from Demo­crat­ic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia. Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas said he was in the yes column. Even with those two sen­at­ors on board, they would still need at least one more thumbs-up from a Re­pub­lic­an to cross the 60-vote threshold that over­comes GOP ob­jec­tions. Manchin would only say, “We’re work­ing on it.”

This is a case where mo­mentum mat­ters. Sen­at­ors who are on the fence about ENDA don’t want to vote “no” on ma­jor civil-rights le­gis­la­tion that winds up passing. Who needs that plastered all over a gen­er­al-elec­tion ad cam­paign? But squeam­ish sen­at­ors who fear primar­ies also need a com­fort level that doesn’t come from gay-rights act­iv­ists. Sup­port from prom­in­ent con­ser­vat­ives such as Sens. Or­rin Hatch, R-Utah, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, will go a long way to­ward con­vin­cing oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans that they aren’t go­ing out on a limb by sup­port­ing the le­gis­la­tion.

Gay-rights groups have de­veloped talk­ing points to play down the sig­ni­fic­ance of the pro­posed leg­al changes, even though the le­gis­la­tion is a gi­ant gay-rights vic­tory. Passing ENDA won’t change most peoples’ every­day lives, they say. Most Amer­ic­ans think it’s already law. (Some polls put the fig­ure as high as 90 per­cent.)

Many large cor­por­a­tions already have an­ti­discrim­in­a­tion policies on sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion, in­clud­ing Mar­ri­ott In­ter­na­tion­al, which is run by a de­vout Mor­mon. The Mor­mon church op­poses gay mar­riage and cam­paigned ag­gress­ively in 2008 for Pro­pos­i­tion 8 in Cali­for­nia to ban same-sex mar­riage. But on the em­ploy­ment front, Mar­ri­ott has been on re­cord since 2009 sup­port­ing a nondis­crim­in­a­tion law for gays, les­bi­ans, and trans­gender work­ers. It’s bet­ter for the bot­tom line, they say.

Many Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans worry that the bill would open up em­ploy­ers to law­suits, an ar­gu­ment that car­ries weight with the GOP. But busi­ness groups that tra­di­tion­ally back Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce and the Busi­ness Roundtable, are of­fi­cially neut­ral on the bill. That takes away some of the sting for any­one who isn’t vehe­mently op­posed. How it plays out after that will be de­term­ined by the mood of the mo­ment.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×