How do you celebrate a bill that won’t become a law? That’s the question facing gay-rights advocates over the next several weeks as they anticipate a historic Senate vote on legislation to ban workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The vote could take place as early as next week, and it will definitely occur before Thanksgiving. It will mark the first time the Senate has voted on the nondiscrimination proposal that has been in the works for 20 years. Its supporters are optimistic that it will pass.
It is highly unlikely that the GOP-led House will take up a Senate-passed gay-rights bill, given the opposition of tea-party and social conservatives. (House GOP staffers say they can’t speculate on the House’s actions until the Senate actually passes the bill. Fair enough.)
Regardless of what the House does, gay-rights advocates have two goals for the upcoming Senate vote: The first is to get lawmakers used to voting on gay rights. They need practice. “There are very few members of Congress that have taken votes on gay issues,” said Fred Sainz, vice president of communications for the Human Rights Campaign. “The more you get to sit with an issue, the more you’re lobbied on an issue, the more comfortable you become with it, the more you see that it’s not the apocalypse.”
The second aim of the Senate vote is to give President Obama an opening to ban sexual-orientation discrimination by federal contractors. That executive option is always open to him, but it becomes easier politically to do it if it appears that Congress will not act. “We have certainly been asking the administration to take executive action,” said Stacey Long, public-policy director for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. “If it passes the Senate, it does sort of leave the question on [the White House’s] doorstep to take action.”
No matter what, the Senate vote on the Employment Non-Discrimination Act is a big deal. It is the first time the Senate has weighed in on the issue of sexual orientation in the workplace, and it is the first bill in either chamber that covers transgender individuals. The House passed a version of ENDA in 2007, which was also a big deal, but it did not cover transgender employees. The Senate bill does.
Senate passage is likely but not a slam dunk. The bill’s sponsors are still lacking a firm commitment from Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Mark Pryor of Arkansas said he was in the yes column. Even with those two senators on board, they would still need at least one more thumbs-up from a Republican to cross the 60-vote threshold that overcomes GOP objections. Manchin would only say, “We’re working on it.”
This is a case where momentum matters. Senators who are on the fence about ENDA don’t want to vote “no” on major civil-rights legislation that winds up passing. Who needs that plastered all over a general-election ad campaign? But squeamish senators who fear primaries also need a comfort level that doesn’t come from gay-rights activists. Support from prominent conservatives such as Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, will go a long way toward convincing other Republicans that they aren’t going out on a limb by supporting the legislation.
Gay-rights groups have developed talking points to play down the significance of the proposed legal changes, even though the legislation is a giant gay-rights victory. Passing ENDA won’t change most peoples’ everyday lives, they say. Most Americans think it’s already law. (Some polls put the figure as high as 90 percent.)
Many large corporations already have antidiscrimination policies on sexual orientation, including Marriott International, which is run by a devout Mormon. The Mormon church opposes gay marriage and campaigned aggressively in 2008 for Proposition 8 in California to ban same-sex marriage. But on the employment front, Marriott has been on record since 2009 supporting a nondiscrimination law for gays, lesbians, and transgender workers. It’s better for the bottom line, they say.
Many Senate Republicans worry that the bill would open up employers to lawsuits, an argument that carries weight with the GOP. But business groups that traditionally back Republicans, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable, are officially neutral on the bill. That takes away some of the sting for anyone who isn’t vehemently opposed. How it plays out after that will be determined by the mood of the moment.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”