First-Ever Senate Vote on Tap to Ban Workplace Discrimination Against Gays

CHICAGO - JULY 21: A man smokes a cigarette outside a Marriott Courtyard hotel near the Magnificent Mile shopping district July 21, 2006 in Chicago, Illinois. Beginning in September Marriott International will ban smoking in all 2,300 of its hotels. 
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Fawn Johnson
Oct. 29, 2013, 6:07 p.m.

How do you cel­eb­rate a bill that won’t be­come a law? That’s the ques­tion fa­cing gay-rights ad­voc­ates over the next sev­er­al weeks as they an­ti­cip­ate a his­tor­ic Sen­ate vote on le­gis­la­tion to ban work­place dis­crim­in­a­tion based on sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion.

The vote could take place as early as next week, and it will def­in­itely oc­cur be­fore Thanks­giv­ing. It will mark the first time the Sen­ate has voted on the nondis­crim­in­a­tion pro­pos­al that has been in the works for 20 years. Its sup­port­ers are op­tim­ist­ic that it will pass.

It is highly un­likely that the GOP-led House will take up a Sen­ate-passed gay-rights bill, giv­en the op­pos­i­tion of tea-party and so­cial con­ser­vat­ives. (House GOP staffers say they can’t spec­u­late on the House’s ac­tions un­til the Sen­ate ac­tu­ally passes the bill. Fair enough.)

Re­gard­less of what the House does, gay-rights ad­voc­ates have two goals for the up­com­ing Sen­ate vote: The first is to get law­makers used to vot­ing on gay rights. They need prac­tice. “There are very few mem­bers of Con­gress that have taken votes on gay is­sues,” said Fred Sainz, vice pres­id­ent of com­mu­nic­a­tions for the Hu­man Rights Cam­paign. “The more you get to sit with an is­sue, the more you’re lob­bied on an is­sue, the more com­fort­able you be­come with it, the more you see that it’s not the apo­ca­lypse.”

The second aim of the Sen­ate vote is to give Pres­id­ent Obama an open­ing to ban sexu­al-ori­ent­a­tion dis­crim­in­a­tion by fed­er­al con­tract­ors. That ex­ec­ut­ive op­tion is al­ways open to him, but it be­comes easi­er polit­ic­ally to do it if it ap­pears that Con­gress will not act. “We have cer­tainly been ask­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion to take ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion,” said Sta­cey Long, pub­lic-policy dir­ect­or for the Na­tion­al Gay and Les­bi­an Task Force. “If it passes the Sen­ate, it does sort of leave the ques­tion on [the White House’s] door­step to take ac­tion.”

No mat­ter what, the Sen­ate vote on the Em­ploy­ment Non-Dis­crim­in­a­tion Act is a big deal. It is the first time the Sen­ate has weighed in on the is­sue of sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion in the work­place, and it is the first bill in either cham­ber that cov­ers trans­gender in­di­vidu­als. The House passed a ver­sion of ENDA in 2007, which was also a big deal, but it did not cov­er trans­gender em­ploy­ees. The Sen­ate bill does.

Sen­ate pas­sage is likely but not a slam dunk. The bill’s spon­sors are still lack­ing a firm com­mit­ment from Demo­crat­ic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia. Mark Pry­or of Arkan­sas said he was in the yes column. Even with those two sen­at­ors on board, they would still need at least one more thumbs-up from a Re­pub­lic­an to cross the 60-vote threshold that over­comes GOP ob­jec­tions. Manchin would only say, “We’re work­ing on it.”

This is a case where mo­mentum mat­ters. Sen­at­ors who are on the fence about ENDA don’t want to vote “no” on ma­jor civil-rights le­gis­la­tion that winds up passing. Who needs that plastered all over a gen­er­al-elec­tion ad cam­paign? But squeam­ish sen­at­ors who fear primar­ies also need a com­fort level that doesn’t come from gay-rights act­iv­ists. Sup­port from prom­in­ent con­ser­vat­ives such as Sens. Or­rin Hatch, R-Utah, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, will go a long way to­ward con­vin­cing oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans that they aren’t go­ing out on a limb by sup­port­ing the le­gis­la­tion.

Gay-rights groups have de­veloped talk­ing points to play down the sig­ni­fic­ance of the pro­posed leg­al changes, even though the le­gis­la­tion is a gi­ant gay-rights vic­tory. Passing ENDA won’t change most peoples’ every­day lives, they say. Most Amer­ic­ans think it’s already law. (Some polls put the fig­ure as high as 90 per­cent.)

Many large cor­por­a­tions already have an­ti­discrim­in­a­tion policies on sexu­al ori­ent­a­tion, in­clud­ing Mar­ri­ott In­ter­na­tion­al, which is run by a de­vout Mor­mon. The Mor­mon church op­poses gay mar­riage and cam­paigned ag­gress­ively in 2008 for Pro­pos­i­tion 8 in Cali­for­nia to ban same-sex mar­riage. But on the em­ploy­ment front, Mar­ri­ott has been on re­cord since 2009 sup­port­ing a nondis­crim­in­a­tion law for gays, les­bi­ans, and trans­gender work­ers. It’s bet­ter for the bot­tom line, they say.

Many Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans worry that the bill would open up em­ploy­ers to law­suits, an ar­gu­ment that car­ries weight with the GOP. But busi­ness groups that tra­di­tion­ally back Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing the U.S. Cham­ber of Com­merce and the Busi­ness Roundtable, are of­fi­cially neut­ral on the bill. That takes away some of the sting for any­one who isn’t vehe­mently op­posed. How it plays out after that will be de­term­ined by the mood of the mo­ment.

What We're Following See More »
JUST IN CASE…
White House Adds Five New SCOTUS Candidates
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.

SAVE THOSE PERTAINING TO EXEC BRANCH
Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Source:
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
6 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
BRITISH PUBLICIST CONNECTED TO TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login