It’s become almost a theme this Congress. Senate conciliators broker deals or craft some legislative solution — often at the very last minute — to avoid a crisis.
Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Chuck Schumer of New York engineered a deal to avert the so-called nuclear option; Schumer and Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee helped get Senate leaders talking before the deal was struck to reopen government and avoid default; and the group known as the Gang of Eight authored the bipartisan immigration bill this year.
But the budget conference committee, which officially starts work Wednesday, is largely lacking these deal-makers.
Instead, leaders on both sides of the aisle decided to tap the entire Senate Budget Committee for the high-profile task of crafting a spending plan for fiscal 2014, with recommendations due in mid-December. The reason, members of both parties say, is obvious enough: The committee members have the most expertise on budget matters.
“The Democratic members of my committee have really worked on this issue from the very beginning of the year. They know the issues,” said Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray, D-Wash. “They know what the values are and have invested a lot in getting to a resolution. They’ll be great players in this.”
Of the 22 senators — there are only seven House members on the conference committee — a few have brokered deals this Congress, including Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a member of the Gang of Eight that shepherded immigration through the upper chamber, and independent Angus King of Maine, who helped seal the deal on student-loan rates with Alexander and others.
Nothing, however, precludes the senators on the committee from cutting a deal this time — and nothing stops those not on the committee from carrying on negotiations separate from the official budget conference, aides say.
“I hope Plan A works, but hopefully there’s also other discussion in the event there isn’t a budget conference that yields a conclusion,” said Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., who himself helped broker a border-security measure that eased passage of the immigration bill this year.
Already, senators are scaling back expectations for what a possible deal will look like. Democrats and Republicans recognize that they’ve been in similar positions before and that the so-called grand bargain has eluded them each time.
“I’m guarded over the whole process,” said Appropriations Committee ranking member Richard Shelby, R-Ala. Sen. Mark Pryor, an Arkansas Democrat, added: “I never thought a grand bargain was realistic at this time — you just don’t have the time. I mean look, if you want to try it, that’s great. More power to them.”
Asked whether the members on the panel could broker the kind of deal that averted crises before, Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., shook his head and chuckled.
As he put it, “Listen, if we don’t we’re all in trouble.”
What We're Following See More »
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."
"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."
"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."