Key U.S. senators are resisting the Obama administration’s calls for delaying legislation that would expand economic sanctions against Iran while international talks are under way to diffuse tensions surrounding the Middle Eastern nation’s nuclear program, according to Bloomberg.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) said he still supports proceeding with an Iran sanctions bill even after meeting on Thursday with Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew.
“I’d have to hear something far more substantive from what I heard today to dissuade me” from acting on legislation, Menendez told reporters, according to the wire service.
The Republican-led House of Representatives passed legislation in July that would broaden economic constraints, and the Senate Banking Committee has been expected to present a similar bill that would blacklist Iran’s mining and construction sectors. Yet Obama, hopeful that the ongoing diplomatic talks with Iran will prove successful, has dispatched senior officials to Capitol Hill to seek a delay in any move to add sanctions.
Senator Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) on Thursday said he did not expect any positive outcome of talks scheduled for next week in Geneva between Iran and the so-called “P-5+1” — United States, Britain, France, China, Russia and Germany.
“Sanctions are the only way to prevent a war,” Kirk reportedly said.
Other senators, including Majority Whip Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), were more open to holding off on new sanctions.
“I think after 10 years of bitter confrontation, sanctions and all of the inflamed rhetoric, that it makes sense for us to be thoughtful on how and when we respond to the Iranians,” Durbin said, according to Agence France-Presse.
Biden on Friday defended the administration’s desire for delaying the legislation on Friday.
“No one is suggesting an open-ended delay for new sanctions, and there may come a point where additional sanctions are necessary,” the vice president’s office said in a statement, according to AFP.
“At the same time, it is important for Congress to reserve its ability to legislate for the moment when it’s most effective in order to give the current P5+1 negotiations the best chance to make real progress in achieving our shared goal of preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” Biden’s office said.
On Thursday technical experts from Iran and the P-5+1 nations completed two days of talks in advance of the high-profile gathering of senior diplomats from the countries in Geneva on Nov. 7 and 8.
- 1 Only the Margin Seems in Doubt in the Presidential Race
- 2 The Late-Breaking Democratic House Targets
- 3 Great Democratic Hopes Energize Quiet Faithful in Missouri
- 4 Will Congress Try to Rein in Obamacare Premiums?
- 5 Smart Ideas: Ken Bone Revealed a Serious Policy Divide, and Elizabeth Warren Seeks a Co-Presidency
What We're Following See More »
Twenty-three members of Congress "on Thursday asked the Justice Department to clarify how a looming rule change to the government's hacking powers could impact privacy rights of innocent Americans. The change, due to take place on December 1, would let judges issue search warrants for remote access to computers located in any jurisdiction, potentially including foreign countries. Magistrate judges can normally only order searches within the jurisdiction of their court, which is typically limited to a few counties."
"Hillary Clinton’s campaign announced that her campaign and joint fundraising committees raised $101 million in the first 19 days of October, giving her committees $153 million in cash on hand." Her campaign itself has about $62 million on hand. The campaign said the average donation was $50.
Hillary Clinton appeared on the campaign trail for the first time with Michelle Obama on Thursday night. At the joint appearance in North Carolina, Mrs. Obama said, “When you hear folks talking about a global conspiracy and saying that this election is rigged, understand that they are trying to get you to stay home. They are trying to convince you that your vote doesn’t matter, that the outcome has already been determined and that you shouldn’t even bother to make your voice heard.”
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”