It turns out that cosponsoring a comprehensive immigration-reform bill isn’t enough for immigration supporters.
The AFL-CIO on Wednesday began what it’s dubbed an “escalation” of immigration-related activities, intended to push House Republican leadership to put a comprehensive reform bill on the floor. The labor group will also launch in-district campaigns aimed at Republicans already signed onto the House bill.
“The time for acting on immigration reform is now and the labor movement has decided to throw down in a big way to make it happen,” AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka told reporters Wednesday.
The campaign includes a two-week, seven-figure ad buy for Spanish-language spots in a handful of markets and voter-contact programs in nine congressional districts. Only three House Republicans have cosponsored the House’s comprehensive immigration bill — and two of them are being targeted by the AFL-CIO.
“It’s not enough to just throw your name on something. You need to be organizing your colleagues in the House,” said Tom Snyder, the AFL-CIO’s immigration campaign manager.
“We’re not going to let them off the hook simply because they cosponsor; they have to do more. We’ve asked them to publicly call out for a vote. Have they done that? No.”
Spanish-language ads will run in Denver; Atlanta; Orlando, Fla.; and Bakersfield, Calif., which is in House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy’s district. English-language ads, which juxtapose pictures of immigrant children, soldiers, and families with controversial statements from Rep. Steve King of Iowa, among other Republicans, will air in the Washington, D.C., area.
Republican Reps. David Valadao and Jeff Denham of California will be targeted by in-district mobilizations. They both signed onto the comprehensive bill in the House, which mirrors the Senate-passed bill (except for its border security provision, which is replaced by a bipartisan House border bill).
“I have been working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to push the discussion of immigration reform forward,” Denham said in a statement to National Journal. “I will continue that effort in coming weeks and look forward to having a full debate with the American people regarding this important issue. My immediate goal is to show the speaker how much support there is for full reform.”
Valadao spokeswoman Anna Vetter said in a statement that immigration is a “top priority” for the congressman, and referred to the portrayal that he hasn’t shown leadership on the issue as “flagrantly inaccurate.”
“Congressman David G. Valadao will continue to work with reasonable leaders from both parties on the issue of immigration reform until a solution is reached,” she said.
Denham and Valadao are both facing competitive races, according to The Cook Political Report.
Other House Republicans being targeted include Reps. Gary Miller and Buck McKeon of California, Mike Coffman and Scott Tipton of Colorado, Steve Pearce of New Mexico, Daniel Webster of Florida, and Joe Heck of Nevada.
The pressure, Snyder said, is intended to push for passage of the immigration bill, rather than for political reasons. But if they don’t mobilize to pass comprehensive immigration reform, he said, “they have to understand that when election time comes, then we’re prepared to make something happen.”
When pressed, Snyder said that that “something” is “to defeat them.”
What We're Following See More »
Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:
- Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
- Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
- They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
- One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”
At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”