Senate Nears Another Meltdown on Presidential Nominees

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 14: U.S. Senate Minority Whip Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) walks through the Capitol Building on October 14, 2013 in Washington, DC. As Democratic and Republican leaders negotiate an end to the shutdown and a way to raise the debt limit, the White House postponed a planned Monday afternoon meeting with Boehner and other Congressional leaders. The government shutdown is currently in its 14th day. (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)
National Journal
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalin
Nov. 6, 2013, 3:28 p.m.

The Sen­ate ap­pears headed for an­oth­er show­down on the so-called “nuc­le­ar op­tion” for chan­ging the rules of the con­firm­a­tion pro­cess to make it harder for the minor­ity party to block pres­id­en­tial ap­point­ments.

With Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., about to call for a pro­ced­ur­al vote on two nom­in­ees to the U.S. Court of Ap­peals for the D.C. Cir­cuit who are op­posed by Re­pub­lic­ans, some Demo­crats are call­ing for the rules change.

Last week, Re­pub­lic­ans blocked both a nom­in­ee to the D.C. Cir­cuit, Pa­tri­cia Mil­lett, and Pres­id­ent Obama’s choice to lead the Fed­er­al Hous­ing Fin­ance Agency, Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C. This week they are prom­ising to block two more ap­peals court nom­in­ees, Cor­ne­lia Pil­lard and Robert Wilkins, when Re­id brings them up for a vote.

“I’m con­fid­ent we will have the same out­come as the first one,” said Sen­ate Minor­ity Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas. Asked wheth­er the ju­di­cial nom­in­ees could get the 60 votes needed to over­come a fili­buster, Cornyn answered simply, “I don’t be­lieve so.”

The Sen­ate skir­ted the is­sue of how con­firm­a­tion votes are con­duc­ted as re­cently as Ju­ly, when Sens. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., and Chuck Schu­mer, D-N.Y., hammered out an agree­ment that fore­stalled a change in the rules to al­low ex­ec­ut­ive nom­in­ees to pro­ceed on a simple-ma­jor­ity vote.

But now, the Demo­crats who led the charge to change the rules then are again say­ing enough is enough.

“It’s prob­ably a couple of weeks away here,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. “I think we will come back and re­vis­it this is­sue, con­sist­ent with our con­ver­sa­tion in Ju­ly about the need for the Sen­ate to be able to hold up-or-down votes.”

Re­id, ac­cord­ing to a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship aide, has not taken the nuc­le­ar op­tion off the table and re­serves the right to change the rules.

For Re­pub­lic­ans, though, the threats seem to have grown wear­i­some.

“Not only have the Demo­crats got­ten nearly everything they want, but at the same time they have pre­served the op­tion to dangle the threat of the nuc­le­ar op­tion again,” said Beth Lev­ine, a spokes­wo­man for Re­pub­lic­ans on the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee. “By al­low­ing the threat to con­tin­ue, they have in ef­fect already changed the rules in many in­stances.”

The dis­ad­vant­age for Demo­crats in chan­ging the rules is that they could someday find them­selves in the minor­ity and be un­able to block nom­in­ees they op­pose. Re­pub­lic­ans eagerly point this out when re­but­ting their col­leagues across the aisle.

But some Demo­crats call for the change non­ethe­less.

“I have said for a long time: The Sen­ate is broken,” Sen. Tom Ud­all, D-N.M., said re­cently in a state­ment. “I called for changes in the Sen­ate rules at the be­gin­ning of this Con­gress, but we didn’t do enough. And now we’re right back in the same dys­func­tion­al situ­ation.”

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
3 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
5 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
7 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
9 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
9 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.