You wouldn’t buy sunscreen without first checking the SPF label. You probably even check the nutrition facts on your food from time to time. And soon, the Environmental Protection Agency hopes, consumers will come to expect similar labels on used cars, insect repellents, and a host of other products.
“It is very much a concerted effort on the agency’s part,” said Jim Jones, who helped design EPA’s insect repellent labels that debuted Wednesday. “We’re really trying to figure out where we can provide information in a manner that is easily accessible to the average consumer and trusting that the American public makes informed decisions.”
The agency is seeking public feedback on its new repellent labels, which tell consumers if a product keeps away mosquitoes or ticks, and for how long. That information isn’t new, Jones said, but previous standards made it inconsistently placed and “densely communicated.”
Attempts to standardize and simplify product information, EPA admits, are modeled after the precedent set by the Food and Drug Administration. “We used the SPF model,” Jones said of the latest label. In the design stage, EPA sought the advice of the FDA, which also has been requiring nutrition labels on packaged foods since 1990. “The coordination with FDA was largely about learning from their experience,” Jones said. “What works with consumers? What doesn’t work?”
Insect repellent isn’t EPA’s first foray into standardized product labeling. Earlier this year, the agency expanded its fuel-mileage stickers to include used cars. Although the stickers’ adjusted standards dropped mileage estimates from original claims, many in the car-sales industry lauded their uniformity and transparency. “Anybody who’s selling a car, dealerships especially, are going to be looking for any edge they can get,” AutoTrader.com site editor Brian Moody told National Journal last month. “What better way to get that edge than an official sticker from the government?”
Consumer advocates also welcome the expansion of government-standard labels. “It’s helpful for the government to set some sort of standard so that all products are meeting that,” said the Consumer Federation of America’s Chris Waldrop. “You want to make sure that the label is something consumers can use and understand.” Based on past success stories, Waldrop said, it won’t take long for other labels to catch on. “Once [nutrition labeling] was on the package, consumers started using it and finding it useful,” he said.
So far, feedback has been positive on the new repellent label, Jones said. Focus groups that tested the label found it to be helpful, and manufacturers have mostly welcomed the increased clarity.
So what’s next on EPA’s label campaign? Jones has his eye on the Design for the Environment program, which designates products that are environmentally safe. While its aims are good, “that label doesn’t really resonate,” Jones said. “We’re going to redesign that label … in a way that it’s really clear to the consumer what we’re trying to convey to them.”
What We're Following See More »
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”
The Democratic National Committee sued the Republican National Committee in U.S. District Court in New Jersey for aiding GOP nominee Donald Trump as he argues that the presidential election is "rigged." The DNC claims "that Trump's argument is designed to suppress the vote in minority communities."
"Two chief fundraisers for the Clinton Foundation pressed corporate donors to steer business opportunities to former President Bill Clinton as well, according to a hacked memo published Wednesday by WikiLeaks. The November 2011 memo from Douglas Band, at the time a top aide to Mr. Clinton, outlines extensive fundraising efforts that Mr. Band and a partner deployed on behalf of the Clinton Foundation and how that work sometimes translated into large speaking fees and other paid work for Mr. Clinton."
House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”