In addressing the nation from the White House to announce the missile strike against Syria, President Trump inched a little closer to presidential normalcy on speeches. The question now is whether he’ll use the medium more often going forward.
Trump’s decision to give a formal speech instead of simply relying on a tweet, as well as his choice of venue and time, placed him in a long line of presidents. All that kept him out of the mainstream of presidential rhetoric were the usual Trumpian twists of hyperbole and his well-known relish for personal attacks.
Trump has always prided himself on being a different kind of president, and until his April 13 Syria speech, that meant no formal prime-time addresses to the nation from the White House. Of the 12 presidents to take office in the Television Age, only one waited longer to make full use of what actor Michael Douglas, playing President Andrew Shepherd in The American President, called “the single greatest home-court advantage in the modern world.”
Only Barack Obama waited longer into his presidency, preferring outside venues for his major addresses early in his first term, not giving his first prime-time address from the White House until June 15, 2010 when he discussed the oil spill despoiling the Gulf Coast. For every other president from Dwight Eisenhower to George W. Bush, the distinct preference from the start was for both the White House setting, which maximized the prestige and gravitas, and the late-hour timing, which maximized the audience. It was from the White House that presidents engaged the nation on the armistice that ended combat in Korea, the Berlin Wall, the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, civil rights, Vietnam, the economy, energy, the Panama Canal, Poland, drugs, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
By this point in their presidencies, everyone between John F. Kennedy and George W. Bush had given at least two prime-time addresses, led by Ronald Reagan with five.
Trump could be said to have spoken to the nation six times before the Syria speech. He spoke five times in 2017: his Inaugural Address on Jan. 20; his introduction of Supreme Court nominee Neal Gorsuch on Jan. 31; his address to Congress on Feb. 28; his speech at Fort Myer on Afghanistan on Aug. 21; and his Nov. 15 report following a trip to Asia. This year he gave the State of the Union address on Jan. 30. Reflecting Trump’s belief that he does better when he has a live audience to feed off of, only the Asia trip report and Friday’s Syria speech lacked supporters to cheer him on.
Many of his supporters were encouraged by what they saw and heard, having long wanted the president to add the formal speech to his arsenal when trying to persuade. Ari Fleischer, George W. Bush’s press secretary, is one of those who was pleased. “It’s highly unusual of Pres. Trump to give a speech explaining his actions,” he tweeted. “I think he’ll find it’s more effective than just tweeting. I hope he does it more often.”
As distinguished professor of rhetoric at Baylor University and head of PresidentialRhetoric.com, Martin Medhurst also was happy that Trump chose to give a White House address. “I prefer speeches to tweets,” he told National Journal. “You are acting in your role as commander in chief. And part of that role is to keep the country informed about what its military is doing and why it’s doing it. That would be hard to do in 140 characters.”
He also thought the speech was a step forward for Trump because he made a historical reference to chemical weaponry in World War I. “One of the things that has been unusual about Trump’s speeches is his general lack of historical awareness or historical references,” he said. “So I was glad to see that.” While acknowledging stylistic differences in Trump’s delivery, he said his speech “doesn’t strike me as greatly out of norms for presidential war rhetoric.”
As always with Trump, the Syria speech was a little more fiery than most presidential addresses. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was described as “brutal” and “murderous” and following a “dark path” and guilty of “evil and despicable” things. These, said Trump, were “not the actions of a man; they are crimes of a monster instead.” While such adjectives certainly match the alleged chemical attack, they were not found in the addresses the same night by the leaders of France and Great Britain. And they are not often found in presidential addresses. “Unprovoked and dastardly” were the most colorful adjectives in Franklin D. Roosevelt’s famous “Day of Infamy” address after Pearl Harbor. In 1991, George H.W. Bush was closer to the Trump model, criticizing Saddam Hussein as a “dictator” who had “raped, pillaged, and plundered” Kuwait. And, in 2003, George W. Bush branded Saddam Hussein as an “outlaw” guilty of “atrocity.”
“With Trump, you’re certainly going to get the informal and colorful language,” said George Edwards III, the Jordan Chair in presidential studies at Texas A&M University. “It isn’t that other speeches don’t have some, but there is a lot more of it in Trump’s. It’s not usually high-sounding language. But it is straightforward language.” He added that no one should be surprised that Trump put the dispute in personal terms, including tweeting that Assad is an “animal.” That, he said, “is how Trump views the world, in highly personal terms, and his modus operandi is to insult those with whom he disagrees.”
There is a different impact, though, when a president says something on Twitter and when he says it in a prime-time address from the White House. Now that he has discovered that greater reach and as he enjoys the favorable reviews the speech received, it would not be surprising if Trump follows the example of Obama and makes greater use of the bully pulpit the deeper he goes into his presidency.
What We're Following See More »
"Saudi Arabia said Saturday that Jamal Khashoggi, the dissident Saudi journalist who disappeared more than two weeks ago, had died after an argument and fistfight with unidentified men inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. Eighteen men have been arrested and are being investigated in the case, Saudi state-run media reported without identifying any of them. State media also reported that Maj. Gen. Ahmed al-Assiri, the deputy director of Saudi intelligence, and other high-ranking intelligence officials had been dismissed."
"Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is scrutinizing how a collection of activists and pundits intersected with WikiLeaks, the website that U.S. officials say was the primary conduit for publishing materials stolen by Russia, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Mueller’s team has recently questioned witnesses about the activities of longtime Trump confidante Roger Stone, including his contacts with WikiLeaks, and has obtained telephone records, according to the people familiar with the matter."
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller is expected to issue findings on core aspects of his Russia probe soon after the November midterm elections ... Specifically, Mueller is close to rendering judgment on two of the most explosive aspects of his inquiry: whether there were clear incidents of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, and whether the president took any actions that constitute obstruction of justice." Mueller has faced pressure to wrap up the investigation from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, said an official, who would receive the results of the investigation and have "some discretion in deciding what is relayed to Congress and what is publicly released," if he remains at his post.
"The Justice Department on Friday charged a Russian woman for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere with the 2018 U.S. election, marking the first criminal case prosecutors have brought against a foreign national for interfering in the upcoming midterms. Elena Khusyaynova, 44, was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. Prosecutors said she managed the finances of 'Project Lakhta,' a foreign influence operation they said was designed 'to sow discord in the U.S. political system' by pushing arguments and misinformation online about a host of divisive political issues, including immigration, the Confederate flag, gun control and the National Football League national-anthem protests."