House Republicans Question EPA ‘Secret Science’

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy faced GOP questions Thursday over her agency's use of science to back up its regulations.
National Journal
Alex Brown
Add to Briefcase
Alex Brown
Nov. 14, 2013, 9:28 a.m.

The head of the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency played reg­u­la­tion whack-a-mole Thursday on Cap­it­ol Hill, as Re­pub­lic­ans on the House Sci­ence Com­mit­tee spent the morn­ing pop­ping cred­ib­il­ity ques­tions about each of their least fa­vor­ite reg­u­la­tions.

Gina Mc­Carthy had been called to testi­fy about GOP charges that the EPA uses “secret sci­ence” to jus­ti­fy its reg­u­la­tions and fails to bal­ance eco­nom­ic costs with en­vir­on­ment­al be­ne­fits.

Sci­ence Com­mit­tee Chair­man Lamar Smith, R-Texas, wanted an­swers about a leaked pro­pos­al that would give the agency ex­pan­ded jur­is­dic­tion over wa­ter­ways. Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner, R-Wis., ques­tioned eth­an­ol man­dates un­der the re­new­able-fuel stand­ard, con­tend­ing el­ev­ated levels of the bio­fuel in gas­ol­ine would dam­age en­gines. Rep. Ral­ph Hall, R-Texas, quizzed Mc­Carthy on hy­draul­ic frac­tur­ing, twice ac­cused her of fili­bus­ter­ing and, ex­as­per­ated, said: “Maybe I can’t un­der­stand any­thing you say be­cause you’re hard to be­lieve, ma’am.”

Rep. Randy Neuge­bauer, R-Texas, chal­lenged Mc­Carthy’s con­ten­tion that car­bon cap­ture and se­quest­ra­tion tech­no­logy for coal-fired power plants is near com­mer­cial read­i­ness. Rep. Randy Hult­gren, R-Ill., took is­sue with a rule that re­quires util­it­ies to im­prove aquat­ic-life pro­tec­tions on in­take equip­ment. Smith asked an­oth­er ques­tion on ozone stand­ards.

Mc­Carthy countered that “sci­ence is the back­bone of our de­cision-mak­ing” and praised the peer re­view and pub­lic dis­clos­ure meth­ods used by the agency. “I’m in­cred­ibly proud of the sci­ence this agency re­lies on,” she said.

She de­fen­ded each of the reg­u­la­tions chal­lenged by law­makers as well as the sci­entif­ic pro­cess EPA used to de­vel­op them.

But Re­pub­lic­ans would have none of it. Rep. Dana Rohra­bach­er, R-Cal­if., ac­cused the agency of cre­at­ing a “closed loop” that drafts sweep­ing reg­u­la­tions and then rigs sci­entif­ic find­ings to jus­ti­fy them. And while most of the GOP com­mit­tee mem­bers ques­tioned the sci­ence be­hind the reg­u­la­tions, one ques­tioned its use­ful­ness in the first place. “Does sci­ence ever change or get proven wrong?” asked Rep. Randy Weber, R-Texas, show­ing little sur­prise when Mc­Carthy answered in the af­firm­at­ive.

As the hear­ing went on, ques­tions strayed in­to some more un­usu­al sub­ject mat­ter, as evid­enced on Twit­ter.

Rep. Massie just asked Mc­Carthy if she is look­ing to reg­u­late the meth­ane emis­sions from cows — what hap­pens when hear­ings go too long.

— Laura Bar­ron-Lopez (@lbar­ron­lopez) Novem­ber 14, 2013

Gina Mc­Carthy tells House com­mit­tee EPA not ex­plor­ing reg­u­lat­ing meth­ane emis­sions from cow flat­u­lence.

— Jason Plautz (@Jason_­Plautz) Novem­ber 14, 2013

Now @Gin­aE­PA be­ing asked at House Sci­ence hear­ing how many ice ages there have been. #Con­gress

— Dar­ren Goode (@Dar­ren­Goode) Novem­ber 14, 2013

Mc­Carthy was giv­en the oc­ca­sion­al re­prieve when some Demo­crats offered up their ques­tions. Rep. Mark Takano, D-Cal­if., asked her to talk about how EPA rules have cre­ated jobs. Rep. Donna Ed­wards, D-Md., wondered about doc­u­ment­a­tion of cli­mate change. “We have a wealth of data that is more than suf­fi­cient,” Mc­Carthy said. “Great!” Ed­wards replied.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
2 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
2 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
3 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login