Former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro is blunter than most when talking about 2020, having recently expressed interest in seeking the Democratic nomination for president. And with an upcoming trip to New Hampshire, he expects even more chatter. But the former San Antonio mayor isn’t sweating the speculation, telling Hanna Trudo, “Folks should be up front with people.”
You’re heading over to New Hampshire …
I got an invitation from the New Hampshire Young Democrats to go out and speak at their annual dinner, and it fits with what I’m working on, which is trying to support young candidates for office and encourage young people to participate, especially in 2018. Looking forward to that. Of course, folks are asking questions about 2020…
Are they wrong to ask?
No, no. I’ve been straightforward that I’m thinking about that. But I won’t make a decision on it until after November and before the end of the year.
You’re not as coy about your interest in 2020 as other Democrats. Why not?
Folks should be up front with people. I haven’t made the decision as to whether I will run, but I am looking at it. And I’m going take the next few months to figure that out.
What does looking at it mean?
I’m getting out to different parts of the country and listening to what folks are saying, getting a sense of what voters are thinking, what’s important to them these days. Most of that is going to happen between now and the end of the year. There’s no campaign apparatus. We haven’t hired anybody. None of that has happened.
Has anybody approached you to run?
Like others, I hear that.
What about from your old boss [former President Obama]?
I haven’t connected with him on that.
People sometimes brush off 2020 stuff by saying, “Oh, it’s three years from the election.” But it’s only a year from the end of the midterms.
Yeah, whether I end up running or not, I recognize that a year from now we’ll be in the beginning of all the announcements. People think of 2020—it’s really not 2020. It starts a lot sooner than that.
You recently launched a PAC, Opportunity First. What have you done so far?
We’re at the beginning of fundraising for the PAC. We launched it right after the New Year, so we’re setting up fundraisers in different cities. We have a digital-media team. … We have a guy … that’s in charge of fundraising. And then we have our folks in charge of compliance. … As it grows during the year, we’ll look at staffing it up.
Are you looking for people with technical digital skills, political experience, social media?
We have folks that are working on the social-media component and emailing. … And we have volunteers right now that are helping to sift through different races that have young progressive candidates in them and then put those together so that I can make decisions on who I’m going to support. But in terms of staffing up, yeah, we’ll look for folks with some good political experience.
Are you going to pop up in Iowa?
I anticipate getting out to a number of states. I haven’t scheduled anything in Iowa, but I’m sure that I’ll be campaigning out in different states, including Florida and California, here in Texas.
Talks about the “Dreamers” are dominating Democratic politics. How do you see yourself fitting into that debate?
I’ve done a couple of media calls with different organizations that support a clean Dream Act. I’ve been active on social media about the need for a legislative solution for the Dreamers. I anticipate in the coming weeks to be active on the issue as well.
Were Senate Democrats right to push to shut down the government over this?
Yeah. They need to fight for individuals who ought to be able to stay in the United States.
You’re also writing a memoir and are a fellow at the University of Texas-Austin. With all of that, do you consider “Opportunity First” to be your full-time job?
Right now the PAC itself is not 60 hours a week. But as we get through these primaries and go into the general election, my time out there on the campaign trail for great candidates and my investment of time on the PAC’s activists will increase. We’re not quite there yet, but I see it ramping up. We’ll be having events or fundraisers for the PAC in several cities here in Texas, in D.C., likely in California.
Like New York and a few other places, California is both progressive and also, of course, always a good source of resources.
What We're Following See More »
The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."
"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."
"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "
"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.