Democrats and Republicans are playing a game of legislative chicken over government funding, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, and the border wall as well as the Children’s Health Insurance Program—with a shutdown deadline of midnight Friday. The problem with the “game of chicken” metaphor is that it implies a fair fight, which this isn’t. When one party has all of the power, the White House as well as majorities in the House and the Senate, that party has total ownership of the government.
Put simply, the GOP would “own” any government shutdown.
As a practical matter, given that there have only been three government shutdowns in the past 25 years (November 1995, December 1995-January 1996, and October 2013), the odds of having a real shutdown of more than a few hours—maybe a few days, or a week at most—are not that high. But that doesn’t mean such an event is harmless to the country, for the markets but most especially for Republicans, whose House majority is extremely tenuous and their Senate majority is now in some jeopardy as well. The GOP was already on thin ice, and this adds considerably more weight.
Whether there is a shutdown this weekend or not, there is one central message that Republicans should want to be front and center in public discourse—and two that they definitely should not.
Republicans desperately need people to focus on the fact that their tax bill passed, and that with President Obama out of office and Congress is Republican hands, businesses no longer feel under siege. Instead, they feel confident enough to hire, expand, invest and compensate their employees better, and voters shouldn’t jeopardize that by electing a Democratic Congress. The past three quarters showed economic growth of about 3 percent, and if the economy continues on this pace through the midterm elections, it is plausible that enough voters—even those who may not like President Trump or approve of much of what he says, does, or tweets—will decide that they like where the economy is enough to give Republicans the benefit of the doubt.
The two things the GOP should want to avoid at any cost is contribute to a sense that the Trump administration and Hill Republicans are a) too incompetent or b) too irresponsible to be trusted running the federal government, and so a Democratic majority in the House and/or Senate is needed.
For Democrats, the job is much simpler: Stay out of the way, and don’t screw it up. As this column noted a week ago: Democrats, no offense, but this election is not about you. By their very nature, midterm elections are referenda on the party in power, usually the party holding the White House, occasionally about the party controlling Congress, in this case, both. To the extent that this election becomes about Democrats, that is probably not a good thing for the Blue Team. When the other party is busy hanging itself, why get in the way? The last thing Democrats should want is to be seen as obstructionist, trying to exacerbate an already-bad situation.
One of the biggest challenges for congressional Republicans right now is that there is a large number of GOP representatives and senators from solidly conservative, Republican states or districts, and they do not need the support of any independents, moderates, or Democrats to get reelected. As a result, they are not motivated to temper their strongest ideological urges or seek compromise because they couldn’t lose a general election even if they tried. Those states and districts are largely not the ones that will determine the GOP’s majority status in the House and Senate, but the members from those places can surely jeopardize things.
All of this seems pretty basic and obvious, but tuning into the various cable news networks and listening to voices from both parties suggest that it isn’t. There is a tendency on both the right and left to view things totally myopically, to see things through a straw, oblivious to how something will sound or play among swing voters and in states and districts unlike their own. If your goal is to avoid a partisan-fueled government shutdown, that’s bad news.
What We're Following See More »
"Saudi Arabia said Saturday that Jamal Khashoggi, the dissident Saudi journalist who disappeared more than two weeks ago, had died after an argument and fistfight with unidentified men inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. Eighteen men have been arrested and are being investigated in the case, Saudi state-run media reported without identifying any of them. State media also reported that Maj. Gen. Ahmed al-Assiri, the deputy director of Saudi intelligence, and other high-ranking intelligence officials had been dismissed."
"Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is scrutinizing how a collection of activists and pundits intersected with WikiLeaks, the website that U.S. officials say was the primary conduit for publishing materials stolen by Russia, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Mueller’s team has recently questioned witnesses about the activities of longtime Trump confidante Roger Stone, including his contacts with WikiLeaks, and has obtained telephone records, according to the people familiar with the matter."
"Special Counsel Robert Mueller is expected to issue findings on core aspects of his Russia probe soon after the November midterm elections ... Specifically, Mueller is close to rendering judgment on two of the most explosive aspects of his inquiry: whether there were clear incidents of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, and whether the president took any actions that constitute obstruction of justice." Mueller has faced pressure to wrap up the investigation from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, said an official, who would receive the results of the investigation and have "some discretion in deciding what is relayed to Congress and what is publicly released," if he remains at his post.
"The Justice Department on Friday charged a Russian woman for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere with the 2018 U.S. election, marking the first criminal case prosecutors have brought against a foreign national for interfering in the upcoming midterms. Elena Khusyaynova, 44, was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. Prosecutors said she managed the finances of 'Project Lakhta,' a foreign influence operation they said was designed 'to sow discord in the U.S. political system' by pushing arguments and misinformation online about a host of divisive political issues, including immigration, the Confederate flag, gun control and the National Football League national-anthem protests."