Baucus’s Tiny Step Toward Tax Reform

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (L), D-MT, speaks before US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew testimony to Senate Finance Committee on the debt limit in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on October 10, 2013.
National Journal
Billy House Sarah Mimms
See more stories about...
Billy House Sarah Mimms
Nov. 19, 2013, 2:27 p.m.

A pro­pos­al to over­haul tax-code rules for U.S. mul­tina­tion­al cor­por­a­tions un­veiled Tues­day by Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee Chair­man Max Baucus promp­ted a mix of re­sponses, with little an­ti­cip­a­tion that the changes could be­come law any­time soon.

The pro­posed changes range from set­ting a min­im­um tax on the in­come these com­pan­ies earn world­wide to im­pos­ing a tem­por­ary tax of about 20 per­cent on earn­ings parked abroad.

Tues­day’s pro­pos­al is a re­sponse to the gen­er­al no­tion that cur­rent law cre­ates too many in­cent­ives for mul­tina­tion­al cor­por­a­tions to in­vest and cre­ate jobs over­seas. Roughly $2 bil­lion in U.S. cor­por­ate earn­ings are es­tim­ated to reside over­seas.

“I agree with Sen­at­or Baucus that tax re­form should raise sig­ni­fic­ant rev­en­ue,” said Rep. Sander Lev­in, D-Mich., the top Demo­crat on the House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee. “As Ways and Means Demo­crats have re­peatedly said, the only path to the needed en­act­ment of tax re­form is a bi­par­tis­an one in both the House and Sen­ate.”

But Baucus’s plan — the first of three drafts on vari­ous as­pects of the tax sys­tem that the Montana Demo­crat will re­lease this week — comes after House Re­pub­lic­ans last week in­dic­ated their tax-re­form ef­forts have been put on hold, at least for the rest of the year. And the pro­spect of re­vamp­ing the tax sys­tem next year, with a midterm elec­tion loom­ing, is seen as un­likely.

Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., the chair­man of the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee, who is lead­ing House Re­pub­lic­an ef­forts, did not ad­dress the spe­cif­ics of the Baucus pro­pos­al Tues­day, but he said the dis­cus­sion over fix­ing “our broken tax code” is “a crit­ic­al de­bate that must take place if we are go­ing to get our eco­nomy back on track,” adding that “I ap­plaud Chair­man Baucus for his con­tin­ued com­mit­ment to ad­van­cing tax re­form for­ward amongst his Sen­ate col­leagues.”

Baucus’s pro­pos­al fol­lowed a closed-door meet­ing with oth­er sen­at­ors on the Fin­ance Com­mit­tee. The draft de­scribes some of the plan’s ob­ject­ives, which in­clude re­du­cing in­cent­ives for U.S. and for­eign mul­tina­tion­als to in­vest in or shift profits to low-tax for­eign coun­tries; re­du­cing in­cent­ives for U.S.-based busi­nesses to move abroad; and sim­pli­fy­ing the tax rules so that firms with the most-soph­ist­ic­ated tax ad­visers are not ad­vant­aged.

Un­der cur­rent law, U.S. com­pan­ies owe taxes at a full fed­er­al rate of 35 per­cent on all in­come earned world­wide. But they can de­fer U.S. tax­a­tion un­til they re­pat­ri­ate the money. Baucus’s plan to re­struc­ture the sys­tem would lower the cor­por­ate rate by an un­spe­cified amount.

But the draft in­cludes two op­tions for tax­ing in­come from products and ser­vices sold in­to for­eign mar­kets.

One would be a min­im­um tax that im­me­di­ately ap­plies to all such in­come at 80 per­cent of the U.S. cor­por­ate tax rate with full for­eign tax cred­its, coupled with a full ex­emp­tion for for­eign earn­ings upon re­pat­ri­ation. An­oth­er is a min­im­um tax that im­me­di­ately ap­plies to in­come at 60 per­cent of the U.S. cor­por­ate rate if de­rived from act­ive busi­ness op­er­a­tions, but at the full U.S. rate if not, coupled with a full ex­emp­tion for for­eign earn­ings upon re­pat­ri­ation.

Some cor­por­a­tions have been call­ing for a “tax-re­pat­ri­ation hol­i­day” to bring those stock­piled earn­ings parked over­seas back to the coun­try. The pro­posed changes out­lined in the Baucus draft don’t do that. But earn­ings of for­eign sub­si­di­ar­ies from peri­ods be­fore the ef­fect­ive date of the pro­pos­al that have not been sub­ject to U.S. tax would now be sub­ject to the one-time tax at a re­duced rate of about 20 per­cent, pay­able over eight years — which es­tim­ates say could bring a one-time, $200 bil­lion shot in­to the U.S. Treas­ury.

The two oth­er draft pro­pos­als that Baucus is ex­pec­ted to re­lease this week will touch on tax ad­min­is­tra­tion and cap­it­al-cost re­cov­ery.

Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew said at a Wall Street Journ­al con­fer­ence on Tues­day that he had dis­cussed the draft with Baucus, and he praised the chair­man for put­ting for­ward a plan that “shares some sig­ni­fic­ant char­ac­ter­ist­ics with the pres­id­ent’s frame­work” while in­clud­ing pro­vi­sions that he hopes will find sup­port among both Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats.

Lew said that such a plan to “deal with the dis­par­ity between the U.S. and in­ter­na­tion­al tax rates” could provide a “shot in the arm” to the Amer­ic­an eco­nomy, and he sug­ges­ted us­ing that one-time rev­en­ue to make crit­ic­al in­vest­ments in in­fra­struc­ture. “It would build a found­a­tion for a strong growth and job-cre­ation eco­nomy,” he said.

But not every­one was so pos­it­ive about the Baucus pro­pos­als. In a state­ment, Busi­ness Roundtable Pres­id­ent John En­gler praised Baucus for his ef­forts, say­ing, “Baucus’ goal of in­creas­ing the abil­ity of U.S. busi­nesses to com­pete abroad is crit­ic­al.”

But he ad­ded, “Un­for­tu­nately, we do not be­lieve that the staff’s in­ter­na­tion­al dis­cus­sion draft sup­ports that goal be­cause it would make many Amer­ic­an com­pan­ies even less com­pet­it­ive than their non-U.S. coun­ter­parts.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
25 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
25 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×