ILLINOIS | IL-gov

Pritzker, Kennedy Agree to 6 Debates

Rauner continued to hit Pritzker on his taxes.

Zach C. Cohen
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Zach C. Cohen
Dec. 7, 2017, 11:04 a.m.

Philanthropist Chris Kennedy (D), venture capitalist J.B. Pritzker (D), and state Sen. Daniel Biss (D) said Wednesday they all “plan to participate in … six debates and forums” from Jan. 23-March 14. (Chicago Sun-Times)

DIGITAL BREAKDOWN. Gov. Bruce Rauner’s (R) campaign released a digital ad “highlighting J.B. Pritzker’s shady tax history.” (Capitol Fax) Pritzker: “I released way more information than Bruce Rauner has, and it’s important to recognize that unlike Bruce Rauner, who, yeah, he paid taxes, but you know how he made his money? By cutting jobs. By buying companies and firing people.” (Chicago Sun-Times)

Pritzker released a video splicing together negative news about the state with Rauner’s statement that he is “not in charge.” (release) Pritzker released a video detailing his favorite TV series and concerts. (Twitter)

State Rep. Jeanne Ives (R) “is scheduled to hold a Thursday news conference to unveil legislation that would repeal an immigration law … Rauner signed. … The law protects immigrants who are in the country illegally from being detained solely because of their immigration status.” (Chicago Tribune)

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRITZKER AND HILLARY CLINTON. Pritzker Campaign Manager Anne Caprara, who ran a super PAC supporting Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, “said the stunning outcome of the 2016 presidential wasn’t because Clinton had a primary election cakewalk and was caught off guard by tough criticism in the general election.”

Caprara: “It was an eye opening experience for me … Hillary Clinton was the most battle-tested candidate in the history of the Republic. She walked into that race with people’s opinions really hardened. .l.. I think the unique opportunity with J.B. is people don’t have hardened opinions about him. There are new people and new faces with our Democratic politics at the moment. I think people are looking at who are the next political leaders.” (Politico)

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login