The GOP effort to rework the tax code is moving into a critical period in the Senate, where lawmakers plan to vote on the bill in the full chamber as soon as this week, but have yet to secure the necessary votes.
Republicans need to convince 50 of their 52 Senate members to vote for the bill, and negotiations will take place all week to sway about a half-dozen GOP senators who are either uncommitted or oppose the legislation. The negotiations could include changes to provisions on pass-through entities or new measures to combat the federal deficit as leadership scrambles to lock down the last remaining votes.
If Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell can corral enough votes through cajoling, deal-making, or however else, it would mark a significant step toward the bill becoming law and put Republicans closer to achieving their sole major legislative victory in 2017.
But two Republicans have already come out against the measure over its treatment of pass-through entities—businesses that pass their profits onto the owner, which are then taxed at the individual rate. Wisconsin’s Ron Johnson and Montana’s Steve Daines have said they won’t vote for the bill as it is.
“I want to see changes to the tax-cut bill that ensure Main Street businesses are not put at a competitive disadvantage against large corporations,” Daines said in an emailed statement, adding that he remained optimistic about arriving at a deal.
One option could be to raise the 17.4 percent deduction for pass-through entities laid out in the Senate tax bill. Another could be to treat the state and local income tax deduction the same between corporations and pass-throughs.
A more immediate issue is whether Johnson would vote for the tax bill when the Senate Budget Committee considers the measure Tuesday. Johnson said late Monday he would vote against the bill in committee if his concerns were unresolved.
“A number of us I don’t think are going to vote for it unless we have these issues fixed,” Johnson told reporters.
The makeup on the committee is 12 Republicans and 11 Democrats. As would be the case for a vote in the full chamber, the bill is unlikely to get any Democratic backing. Johnson said he would be meeting with leadership staff Monday night on the issue.
Efforts to provide more tax relief to pass-through entities could bump up against the other big issue that some lawmakers have with the sweeping tax bill: its deficit impact.
According to a Congressional Budget Office report released Sunday, the Senate tax bill will add about $1.4 trillion to the deficit over a decade. And that figure doesn’t factor in the notion that a future Congress would likely renew several personal tax breaks the bill sets to expire in 2025, at a cost of several hundred billion dollars.
Deficit-hawk senators such as Jeff Flake, Bob Corker, and James Lankford have balked at the idea of adding so much to the national debt.
That’s why Corker has proposed creating “backstop” provisions in the legislation in case the economy doesn’t achieve the economic growth needed to pay for the bill, possibly through changing tax rates.
Corker told reporters that he has been working throughout the Thanksgiving break on the issue with members of the administration and Finance Committee, talking “nonstop throughout the weekend” with White House chief economic adviser Gary Cohn. The administration, he said, is receptive to the idea.
Corker is also a member of the Senate Budget Committee and said it was possible that he would vote no on the bill unless he received a deal on the deficit issue. Corker didn’t give details on the structure of any revenue-raiser but said it should be large enough to make up the shortfall.
“It’s got to be at a point in time that allows you to recoup what hasn’t been met up until that date, so the order of magnitude depends on what shortfall might exist,” Corker said.
Elsewhere, Sen. Susan Collins’s vote remains an open question after she voiced concern over the Senate bill’s proposal to repeal the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate on purchasing health insurance.
Others who could voice opposition include Sens. John McCain, Lisa Murkowski, and Jerry Moran—who told a Kansas newspaper last week that he preferred the Senate drop the individual-mandate repeal from its bill and address it separately.
That’s an unlikely proposition, however, as the individual-mandate provision would raise between $300 and $400 billion and is necessary for the bill to meet fiscal constraints in the Senate.
The White House, which has so far applied a light touch in whipping tax-reform votes in Congress, is ramping up its efforts this week as well.
President Trump hosted members of the Senate Finance Committee on Monday. The president is set to push the tax plan at the GOP senators’ weekly policy lunch Tuesday.
After Monday’s meeting, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch said that he wasn’t concerned about the major differences between the Senate and House tax plans, which treat the deduction for state and local taxes differently, among other provisions.
“We’re generally able to get together and solve these problems, and I think we will,” Hatch told reporters.
If the Senate passes its tax bill, it would need to be reconciled with the House version, which passed earlier this month. But some analysts have said congressional GOP leaders may push for an informal conference between the House and Senate, applying the changes to the final Senate version and having the House then take up that bill, avoiding a potentially weeks-long conference-committee process.
Hatch said he hoped to get a bill to the White House by Christmas.
What We're Following See More »
The Supreme Court announced "that it would consider a challenge to President Trump’s latest effort to limit travel from countries said to pose a threat to the nation’s security." The case concerns Trump's most recent attempt to make good on a campaign promise "tainted by religious animus" and only questionably justified by national security concerns. The decision to take the case, called Trump v. Hawaii, comes almost exactly a year after Trump issued the first travel ban. The ban under consideration affects Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea.
Trump wants to move the two grants, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas grant and the Drug Free Communities Act, to the Justice and Health and Human Services departments, respectively. This would result in a $300 million plus reduction in funding, about 95 percent of the cost of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. "'I’m baffled at the idea of cutting the office or reducing it significantly and taking away its programs in the middle of an epidemic,'" said Regina LaBelle, who served as ONDCP chief of staff during the Obama administration. This is the second time the Trump Administration has proposed gutting the agency.
A new report assembled by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has identified more than 500 potential conflicts of interest in President Trump's first year. First, the report notes, Trump spent 122 days at his properties during his first year. He has been accompanied by 70 federal officials and 30 members of Congress. "Second, far from this signaled access to power being an empty promise, those who patronize President Trump’s businesses have, in fact, gained access to the president and his inner circle." Lastly, about 40 special interest groups and 11 foreign governments have held events at Trump properties.