ALASKA | AK-gov

Judge Rules Indies Can Seek Dem Nod

Gov. Bill Walker could join the primary, but he hasn’t indicated he’s interested in doing so.

Oct. 18, 2017, 10:31 a.m.

State Superior Court Judge Philip Pallenberg “on Tuesday sided with Democrats seeking to allow independent candidates to run in their party primaries. … Democrats asked that the law be considered unconstitutional to the extent that it restricts candidate participation to registered members when political party rules allow for non-member candidates.

“The decision could be appealed. State Department of Law spokeswoman Cori Mills said by email that the state is reviewing the decision.”

“When asked if they would consider running in the Democratic party if allowed,” Gov. Bill Walker (I) “in August said things sometimes change during an election process and ‘we typically don’t say never to anything, quite honestly. … But this is the path that we have chosen’ and having a bipartisan administration has served Alaska well, he said at that time. Walker campaign spokeswoman, Lindsay Hobson, said Tuesday that Walker and” his running mate, Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott (D) “did not have a comment on the court decision.

State Republican Party Chair Tuckerman Babcock praised the decision and “plans to ask his party’s rules committee to look at the state GOP’s rules and ‘how we might address additional opportunities,’ he said.” (AP)

“In practical terms, this means a non-Democrat could win against a registered Democrat in the Democrats’ primary, and then go on to represent the Democrats in the general election. For example, if … Walker decides to run in [and win] the Democrats’ primary … he’d have to appear on the General Election ballot as a Democrat, according to the court ruling.” (Must Read Alaska)

What We're Following See More »
CRITICS CALL RULE "AN INDIRECT WAY TO DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD"
Trump Blocks Federal Funding to Groups that Make Abortion Referrals
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration took aim at Planned Parenthood Friday, issuing a rule barring groups that provide abortions or abortion referrals from participating in the $286 million federal family planning program — a move that is expected to direct millions toward faith-based providers."

Source:
SENATE MUST THEN VOTE ON MEASURE WITHIN 18 DAYS
House Expects Tuesday Vote to End National Emergency
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House plans to vote Tuesday on legislation to formally block President Donald Trump’s attempt to circumvent Congress to fund his border wall, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Friday. The privileged resolution to stop Trump’s emergency declaration — which has 226 co-sponsors, including one Republican — is expected to easily pass the House. It then will be voted in the Senate within 18 days."

Source:
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login