Here Are America’s Most Wanted (House Committee Chairmen)

Congressional committees are kind of like Hogwarts.

Add to Briefcase
Stephanie Stamm and Emma Roller
June 5, 2014, 1 a.m.

Con­gres­sion­al com­mit­tees are a bit like the four houses of Hog­warts School of Witch­craft and Wiz­ardry — some are more de­sir­able to get in­to than oth­ers.

So, which com­mit­tees are more Gry­ffind­or than Slyther­in? In the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives, three com­mit­tees have his­tor­ic­ally at­trac­ted the most mem­bers: Ways and Means, En­ergy and Com­merce, and Ap­pro­pri­ations. They are led, re­spect­ively, by Re­pub­lic­an Reps. Dave Camp and Fred Up­ton of Michigan, and Har­old Ro­gers of Ken­tucky.

When try­ing to suss out what makes some com­mit­tees more de­sir­able than oth­ers, there are two factors that drive all things in polit­ics: money and power. Con­sider the op­er­at­ing budgets and how much money each com­mit­tee spent on its own busi­ness in 2013 alone. The Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee, which con­trols U.S. spend­ing policy, spent $22.9 mil­lion in the 2013 fisc­al year, in­clud­ing more than $18.7 mil­lion for staff pay.

Reps. Hal Rogers, Fred Upton, and Dave Camp (L-R). National Journal

But while the Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee has the most money to push around, the Com­mit­tee on Ways and Means has ar­gu­ably the most power. More bills are re­ferred to Ways and Means than any oth­er com­mit­tee. In the 112th Con­gress, nearly a third of bills were re­ferred to Ways and Means. That could ex­plain why mem­bers find it such a de­sir­able club to join — between 1995 and 2011, roughly 13 mem­bers joined the com­mit­tee for every one mem­ber who left it. (One mem­ber who will be leav­ing soon is Camp, the chair­man, who has an­nounced his re­tire­ment.)

As Stacy Kaper wrote last Oc­to­ber:

With only 39 mem­bers — smallish by con­gres­sion­al stand­ards — a seat on Ways and Means is a rar­efied as­sign­ment. Twenty-one House speak­ers, eight pres­id­ents, and four Su­preme Court justices have served on the pan­el. When new­comers want to join, they typ­ic­ally have to wait for someone on Ways and Means from their state or re­gion to re­tire, lose reelec­tion, or die.

The vague-sound­ing com­mit­tee — just what is “ways and means” sup­posed to mean? — is the old­est in Con­gress, cre­ated to deal with tax policy. That’s be­cause the Con­sti­tu­tion re­quires that all bills for rais­ing rev­en­ue shall ori­gin­ate in the House. But the com­mit­tee does much more than dis­cuss tax policy — it was in front of the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee that Kath­leen Se­beli­us test­i­fied about the failed rol­lout of the Af­ford­able Care Act.

Second to Ap­pro­pri­ations is En­ergy and Com­merce, led by Up­ton. As Amy Harder wrote last April, En­ergy and Com­merce has the broad­est jur­is­dic­tion of any com­mit­tee — “any­thing that moves, burns, or is sold.” For that reas­on, En­ergy and Com­merce comes in second only to Ways and Means in the num­ber of bills that get re­ferred to it. Since it also over­sees the De­part­ment of Health and Hu­man Ser­vices, the com­mit­tee’s hear­ings were Ground Zero for the de­bate over Obama­care. And though he may not be as fam­ous as his niece Kate, Chair­man Up­ton is known as “in­flu­en­tial, per­sist­ent, and friendly” among his col­leagues.

“Some of the most tal­en­ted and know­ledge­able mem­bers on Cap­it­ol Hill from both parties serve on En­ergy and Com­merce, and we work hard as a team to pro­duce mean­ing­ful le­gis­la­tion, con­duct rig­or­ous over­sight, and shine a light on is­sues at the fore­front of our na­tion­al de­bate,” Up­ton said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al.

An hon­or­able men­tion goes to the House Over­sight and Gov­ern­ment Af­fairs Com­mit­tee, which is tasked with in­vest­ig­at­ing fraud and ab­use in the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. The com­mit­tee came in third in terms of its 2013 op­er­at­ing budget. And the com­mit­tee’s chair­man, Rep. Dar­rell Issa of Cali­for­nia, has garnered many in­cen­di­ary hear­ings (and even more head­lines) with his com­mit­tee’s work. Think of the IRS or Benghazi scan­dals — they wouldn’t have had nearly as much stay­ing power without Issa’s dogged pur­suit of Obama prox­ies like Eric Hold­er, Hil­lary Clin­ton, and now John Kerry.

“As has been ex­haust­ively doc­u­mented, our fed­er­al gov­ern­ment wastes bil­lions of dol­lars each year, either through mis­man­age­ment or through out­right stu­pid­ity,” Issa wrote in a joint state­ment ask­ing for more money last March. “The Over­sight Com­mit­tee is in a unique po­s­i­tion in that for every dol­lar you in­vest in us, we re­turn it one hun­dred — or per­haps one thou­sand — times over in po­ten­tial sav­ings.”

Ob­vi­ously, there are oth­er com­mit­tee chairs in the House who wield con­sid­er­able power. As chair­man of the Budget Com­mit­tee, Rep. Paul Ry­an of Wis­con­sin has shaped Re­pub­lic­ans’ spend­ing philo­sophy — even if his pro­pos­als don’t have a chance of be­com­ing law with Harry Re­id as Sen­ate ma­jor­ity lead­er and Barack Obama as pres­id­ent. Rep. Buck McK­eon of Cali­for­nia, who leads the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, and Rep. Bob Good­latte of Vir­gin­ia, who chairs the Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee, have also made their pres­ence known. And Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Car­o­lina has the op­por­tun­ity to gen­er­ate a lot of press lead­ing the newly cre­ated se­lect com­mit­tee to in­vest­ig­ate the Benghazi at­tack, and thereby pick up where Issa left off. (Then, there will al­ways be the less sought-after com­mit­tees: go­ing back to our Hog­warts meta­phor, the House Sci­ence Com­mit­tee may well be Huffle­puff.)

But in terms of power and de­sirab­il­ity — both real and per­ceived — these three chair­men are Con­gress’ Most Wanted.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.