TEXAS | TX-23

Texas Redistricting Trial Begins Monday

It could make some congressional districts more favorable to Democrats.

Ally Mutnick
Add to Briefcase
Ally Mutnick
July 10, 2017, 11:09 a.m.

“A tri­al be­gin­ning today in San Ant­o­nio to de­term­ine the con­sti­tu­tion­al­ity of Texas’ 2013 re­dis­trict­ing maps is ex­pec­ted to set the stage for changes to state and con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts ahead of the 2018 elec­tion.” The judges “will not hear open­ing ar­gu­ments but will go straight in­to hear­ing evid­ence from a num­ber of plaintiffs, ac­cord­ing to court re­cords.” Evid­ence about the state House maps is ex­pec­ted first, fol­lowed by evid­ence about the con­gres­sion­al maps.” (San Ant­o­nio Ex­press-News)

THE FIELD. Former Hous­ing and Urb­an De­vel­op­ment of­fi­cial Ju­dith Canales (D) is con­sid­er­ing a run against Rep. Will Hurd (R) and said pos­sible re­dis­trict­ing won’t af­fect her de­cision. She served as a “ad­min­is­trat­or for Rur­al Busi­ness and Co­oper­at­ive Pro­grams in the De­part­ment of Ag­ri­cul­ture” and is “based in Eagle Pass, where she once served as as­sist­ant city man­ager. … Spec­u­la­tion also has fo­cused on As­sist­ant U.S. At­tor­ney Jay Hul­ings, who at­ten­ded Har­vard Law School and served nearly two years as the deputy chief coun­sel for the House Per­man­ent Se­lect Com­mit­tee on In­tel­li­gence.” (San Ant­o­nio Ex­press-News)

THE STAKES. “It’s un­clear when the pan­el will rule after this week’s hear­ing wraps up. But loc­al elec­tion ad­min­is­trat­ors have said they need clar­ity on dis­trict bound­ar­ies by Oc­to­ber so they have enough time to pre­pare for the March primar­ies, send out voter re­gis­tra­tion cards and meet oth­er elect­or­al dead­lines. If the court rules that the 2013 maps must be fixed ahead of the elec­tions, it could set off a scramble to fi­nal­ize a ver­sion of the state maps that are ac­cept­able to the court without delay­ing the up­com­ing elec­tions.” (Texas Tribune)

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
2 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
2 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login