OFF TO THE RACES

Democrats Take Heart: The GOP Is Sinking

Despite their special-selection losses, they’re viewed more favorably than Republicans and much better than President Trump.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi during a weekly news conference on June 9.
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
Charlie Cook
July 6, 2017, 8 p.m.


After last month’s losses in the Geor­gia 6th Dis­trict and South Car­o­lina 5th Dis­trict races, a nar­rat­ive took hold on why the Demo­crat­ic Party had whiffed in all four com­pet­it­ive spe­cial elec­tions this year—it had no mes­sage, it had no lead­er­ship, and its most vis­ible rep­res­ent­at­ive, House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, had be­come a li­ab­il­ity. Bot­tom line: Demo­crats were doomed to a poor show­ing in the 2018 midterms. “Our brand is worse than Trump,” Demo­crat­ic Rep. Tim Ry­an of Ohio pro­nounced to The New York Times.

It seemed to mat­ter little that Demo­crats nev­er had much of a chance in the Kan­sas, Montana, and South Car­o­lina con­tests. Only pres­sure (or sham­ing) from the party’s lib­er­al net­roots pushed the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee to com­pete in these long-shot dis­tricts in the first place.

While the Demo­crat­ic brand is cer­tainly not ster­ling these days, polls con­sist­ently show that the party is viewed more fa­vor­ably than Re­pub­lic­ans and stra­to­spher­ic­ally bet­ter than Pres­id­ent Trump.

The ma­jor polls don’t test at­ti­tudes to­ward the parties of­ten dur­ing the off-elec­tion years, but an April poll by NBC News and The Wall Street Journ­al found that 31 per­cent had a pos­it­ive view of the Re­pub­lic­an Party, 47 per­cent had a neg­at­ive view, and 21 per­cent were neut­ral, for a net of minus-16 points.

The poll showed 34 per­cent hold­ing pos­it­ive views of Demo­crats, with 39 per­cent neg­at­ive and 26 per­cent neut­ral, for a net of minus-5 points.

When NBC News and the Journ­al in­ter­viewed 765 re­gistered voters June 17 to 20 and asked which party they pre­ferred to con­trol Con­gress after the next elec­tion, 50 per­cent favored Demo­crats, the highest share either party has re­ceived in nine years, while 42 per­cent pre­ferred Re­pub­lic­ans.

So it’s pretty clear that while the im­age of Demo­crats is not ex­actly spec­tac­u­lar, the party is far bet­ter off than Re­pub­lic­ans. The Demo­crat­ic ad­vant­age is even more pro­nounced when the party’s stand­ing is com­pared to that of Trump, who had a minus-15 job ap­prov­al rat­ing in May and June NBC/WSJ polls.

What many people mean when they talk about the Demo­crats’ lead­er­ship is the party’s most prom­in­ent mem­bers on Cap­it­ol Hill, where the top three Demo­crats in the House are sep­tua­gen­ari­ans and where the new Sen­ate lead­er, Chuck Schu­mer, is 66 and something less than a house­hold name. Most of the trash talk­ing is dir­ec­ted at Pelosi, 77, who has been the top Demo­crat in the House since 2003, when she took over for Dick Geph­ardt.

Ad track­ing from Kantar Me­dia’s Cam­paign Me­dia Ana­lys­is Group shows that Pelosi was the tar­get for 4,653 GOP tele­vi­sion spots dur­ing the Geor­gia spe­cial elec­tion, prompt­ing many ana­lysts to blame her for Jon Os­soff’s loss and one Re­pub­lic­an con­sult­ant to say that she was “the gift that keeps on giv­ing.” I think Os­soff’s age (30), thin re­sume, and res­id­ence out­side the dis­trict were big­ger prob­lems. But be­cause he was es­sen­tially a cipher, it was easi­er to at­tack Pelosi, whose low stand­ing among Re­pub­lic­ans drew many to the polls.

Would House Demo­crats be­ne­fit from a new gen­er­a­tion of lead­ers? Of course, but it’s not at all clear who they might be and an in­tra­mur­al fight would likely be a dis­trac­tion for the party. And who could raise even half the money that Pelosi does each cycle? I am an in­de­pend­ent and a dyed-in-the-wool mod­er­ate, so I am closer philo­soph­ic­ally to Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er. But he couldn’t be­gin to raise as much money, and cer­tainly none of the young­er mem­bers could. My hunch is that Pelosi feels an ob­lig­a­tion to stick around and raise money to help her party win back its ma­jor­ity, and once that hap­pens, she would be more than de­lighted to head back to San Fran­cisco.

It would surely be bet­ter for Demo­crats if they were united be­hind a single lead­er and had a uni­fied mes­sage. The real­ity, however, is that no party has a clear lead­er or mes­sage in its first year out of the White House. The Demo­crats’ rais­on d’être is to op­pose Pres­id­ent Trump and the Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­it­ies in the House and Sen­ate. When minor­ity parties have suc­ceeded in midterm elec­tions, it has been be­cause voters were not happy with the people and party in power and de­cided to go with the al­tern­at­ive. This is the way Amer­ic­an polit­ics works. It might well be all that House Demo­crats need next year.

What We're Following See More »
SAVE THOSE PERTAINING TO EXEC BRANCH
Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
18 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Source:
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
3 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
BRITISH PUBLICIST CONNECTED TO TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Source:
SPEAKING ON RUSSIAN STATE TV
Kislyak Says Trump Campaign Contacts Too Numerous to List
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak said on Wednesday that it would take him more than 20 minutes to name all of the Trump officials he's met with or spoken to on the phone. ... Kislyak made the remarks in a sprawling interview with Russia-1, a popular state-owned Russian television channel."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login