A recent power play by House leadership on legislation to reform National Security Agency surveillance has cast reform advocates in a tailspin as they hunt for opportunities to advance their cause.
House Republican leadership aides say they are still hammering out plans for the highly anticipated debate over the reach of the NSA’s power to gather information from the phone and Internet records of millions of ordinary Americans.
Last week, leadership abruptly pulled the plug on a markup in the Senate Intelligence Committee, so that legislation that would protect the NSA’s controversial surveillance could go straight to the floor. That move is raising consternation among reform champions who want to put limits on government surveillance.
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis. — a senior Judiciary Committee member who was a leading author of the USA Patriot Act, which paved the way for the NSA’s surveillance practices — is vowing to challenge House leaders.
If leadership brings the Intelligence Committee bill, led by Reps. Mike Thompson, D-Calif., Frank LoBiondo, R-N.J., and Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., to the floor, Sensenbrenner told National Journal Daily he would go to the Rules Committee and demand a vote on his bill too.
“If Rogers’s bill goes to the floor, I will ask the Rules Committee to make my bill in order,” Sensenbrenner said.
Sensenbrenner’s bill would end the NSA’s bulk data-collection methods, and it has been referred to the Judiciary, Intelligence, and Financial Services committees.
The Judiciary Committee, led by Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., has primary jurisdiction over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorizes the NSA activities, and it has expected to have its say in this debate.
“It’s our very strong preference to have Judiciary have its imprint on whatever product comes about,” said a committee aide. “This is our primary jurisdiction so we expect to be leading the effort.”
But leadership in both parties has largely taken steps to defend the status quo, arguing that the NSA’s surveillance methods are necessary to thwart terrorist threats.
“Both [Speaker John] Boehner and [Minority Leader Nancy] Pelosi are in favor of what the Intelligence Committee is doing,” Sensenbrenner said. “The biggest challenge is procedurally to get a vote. If Judiciary is short-circuited on the Rogers’ bill and it is brought directly to the floor, then I think I ought to be allowed to bring my bill directly to the floor and let the House decide.”
Sensenbrenner’s bill has attracted 103 cosponsors.
Sensenbrenner said that as a former Judiciary Committee chairman he is familiar with how to use House procedure to his advantage, but he admitted figuring out how to secure a vote “is to be determined.”
“I know the rules and I know how one can use the rules to advance legislation. That is how there were 115 Judiciary bills that actually were signed,” he said.
The Intelligence Committee is expecting both a separate intelligence authorization bill, which passed the committee last week, and its NSA bill to come to the floor separately this year.
Leadership is so far noncommittal on the timing and process.
A senior House GOP aide said there had been little discussion as of Tuesday about potential floor action next week on the Intelligence authorization or NSA reform.
“If we are doing those, it would probably be the second week in December,” the aide said.
A different leadership aide reiterated comments made last week when the Intelligence vote was yanked.
“There is significant member interest in this issue as well as multiple committees with jurisdiction. Leadership is working to ensure that there is a well-coordinated process with all interested parties going forward,” the aide said.
What We're Following See More »
The House Intelligence Committee voted to release the November 14 testimony of Glenn Simpson, the man at Fusion GPS who oversaw the creation of the now infamous Trump-Russia dossier. Simpson's testimony includes a number of startling claims, including that Russia infiltrated conservative political groups prior to the election, and that Trump had "long time associations" with the Italian Mafia," and that he "gradually during the nineties became associated with Russian mafia figures." Simpson also testified that Trump called off a post-election meeting with Alexander Torshin, the deputy governor of Russia’s central bank and a longtime member of the NRA, currently under investigation by the FBI for money laundering. Simpson said that the discoveries were so alarming that he felt compelled to go to the authorities. The full text of the transcript can be read here.
House Speaker Paul Ryan says he has the votes to pass a short-term spending bill tonight, but "Senate Democrats said they're confident they have the votes to block the stop-gap spending bill that the House is taking up, according to two Democratic senators and a senior party aide. And top Senate Republicans are openly worried about the situation as they struggle to keep their own members in the fold."
The bipartisan legislation, known as the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 Reform Act, means taxpayers will "no longer foot the bill" for sexual harassment settlements involving members of Congress." The legislation "would require members to pay such settlements themselves." It also reforms the "cumbersome and degrading" complaint process by giving victims "more rights and resources," and by simplifying and clarifying the complaint process. The legislation is the first major transformation of the sexual harassment complaint system since it was created in 1995.
"The FBI is investigating whether a top Russian banker with ties to the Kremlin illegally funneled money to the National Rifle Association to help Donald Trump win the presidency." Investigators have focused on Alexander Torshin, the deputy governor of Russia’s central bank "who is known for his close relationships with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and the NRA." The solicitation or use of foreign funds is illegal in U.S. elections under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) by either lobbying groups or political campaigns. The NRA reported spending a record $55 million on the 2016 elections.