Congress to Karzai: Sign the Darn Security Pact Already

LONDON, ENGLAND - OCTOBER 29: H.E. Hamid Karzai, President of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan speaks during the Opening Ceremony & Leaders Panel at the 9th World Islamic Economic Forum at ExCel on October 29, 2013 in London, England.
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sara Sorcher
Dec. 4, 2013, 3:13 p.m.

As of last week­end, the much-an­ti­cip­ated se­cur­ity pact gov­ern­ing the fu­ture of Amer­ic­an troops in Afgh­anistan looked good to go. Days after Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry tri­umphantly an­nounced agree­ment on the fi­nal lan­guage, a con­ven­tion of Afgh­anistan’s 2,500 tri­bal eld­ers gave their ap­prov­al.

Yet there was one last-minute — and sur­pris­ing — road­b­lock after more than a year of tough ne­go­ti­ations over the post-2014 part­ner­ship between the two na­tions: Afghan Pres­id­ent Ham­id Kar­zai. Now mem­bers of Con­gress, in­creas­ingly frus­trated with this some­times-vex­ing ally, are fir­ing back.

“That agree­ment needs to be signed as soon as pos­sible,” House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Adam Smith, D-Wash., told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. The U.S.-led co­ali­tion was ex­pec­ted to leave a fol­low-on force of 8,000 to 12,000 troops in Afgh­anistan after the com­bat mis­sion form­ally ends in 2014 — but seni­or U.S. of­fi­cials stress the agree­ment must be signed by year-end to pre­pare for that mis­sion. “There’s a lead time here,” Smith said. “It’s not like we can wait un­til the ab­so­lute last minute and de­cide to stay.”

Kar­zai wants to sign the agree­ment only after his suc­cessor is elec­ted in April, and he has ad­ded new de­mands, in­clud­ing for the U.S. to re­lease Afghans held at Guantanamo Bay. “I don’t know that people an­ti­cip­ated, with the loya jirga [grand coun­cil] hav­ing ap­proved it and Kar­zai’s Cab­in­et be­ing in fa­vor of it, that Kar­zai would turn out to be the biggest obstacle,” said House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee mem­ber Adam Schiff, D-Cal­if.

Re­fer­ring to Kar­zai, House Armed Ser­vices Vice Chair­man Mac Thorn­berry, R”‘Texas, quipped: “I don’t know what’s go­ing on with him.”

“I think that [his] volat­il­ity is part of the prob­lem,” Thorn­berry ad­ded. “Re­ports that I read are that the Afghans them­selves are get­ting fed up with it…. The best out­come here is for the Afghans to say, “˜We can’t con­tin­ue this; we need to sign the agree­ment and know what’s ahead for our coun­try.’ “ The longer the un­cer­tainty con­tin­ues, he said, the more likely loc­al lead­ers will hedge their bets and side with the Taliban.

“His abil­ity to kind of act out or be dif­fi­cult to deal with nev­er sur­prises us,” said Sen. Robert Ca­sey, D-Pa. “But I don’t think we should over­ana­lyze what he says some­times, be­cause ob­vi­ously he’s deal­ing with his own polit­ic­al or do­mest­ic cir­cum­stances. I think the most im­port­ant thing is to just keep push­ing to get an agree­ment … do everything we can to make sure the sac­ri­fices our fight­ing men and wo­men and our tax­pay­ers made are go­ing to be val­id­ated.”

Some Re­pub­lic­ans feel it’s time for Pres­id­ent Obama to be­come more dir­ectly in­volved. “The pres­id­ent didn’t en­gage in a way that al­lowed Amer­ica and Ir­aq to cut a deal to provide for the sta­bil­ity of that coun­try, and we see the con­sequences of that now,” said an aide to the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, which is chaired by Rep. Buck McK­eon, R-Cal­if. “It’s cru­cial in the chair­man’s mind that the pres­id­ent weigh in and not wait un­til the last minute, un­til the clock runs out, and walk away,” the aide said.

Some mem­bers were sens­it­ive to Kar­zai’s pre­dic­a­ment. “Kar­zai is look­ing ahead to his leg­acy and his sur­viv­al once he leaves of­fice — I think both lit­er­ally and fig­ur­at­ively,” Schiff said. “What the Afghans prize most in their lead­ers is stand­ing up to for­eign oc­cu­pi­ers, and I think this is his way of leav­ing a last­ing im­pres­sion of de­fi­ance, even of his al­lies.”

Schiff cau­tioned that Kar­zai is mak­ing the wrong bet, con­sid­er­ing the gen­er­al at­ti­tude Amer­ic­ans have to­ward the Afghan war. “It un­der­es­tim­ates the de­gree to which the Amer­ic­an pub­lic would em­brace the zero op­tion,” he said.

There is “little ap­pet­ite from the Amer­ic­an pub­lic for put­ting our troops at risk for an­oth­er in­def­in­ite peri­od of time,” Schiff said, “and little en­thu­si­asm for spend­ing ad­di­tion­al bil­lions of dol­lars in Afgh­anistan when a lot of that money leaves the coun­try in suit­cases of cash. So I think it’s a very ill-con­sidered gamble.”

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
11 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×