Democrats Target Trump-Buyer’s Remorse in 2018

The party hopes to lure back working-class voters by criticizing the president’s health care and tax plans.

President Trump waves as he walks off stage after signing an Energy Independence Executive Order on Tuesday.
AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais
Ally Mutnick
Add to Briefcase
Ally Mutnick
March 29, 2017, 8:01 p.m.

House Demo­crats ap­pear to have found a cam­paign mes­sage more than a year and a half be­fore the midterms: Pres­id­ent Trump turned his back on the work­ing-class voters who sent him to the White House.

As Re­pub­lic­ans’ trade­mark cam­paign prom­ise to re­peal Obama­care im­ploded, top House Demo­crats de­scribed the fumble not as a sil­ver bul­let for 2018 but the be­gin­ning of two years of GOP policies that will pri­or­it­ize the wealthy at the ex­pense of a rur­al, blue-col­lar elect­or­ate that helped Re­pub­lic­ans win total con­trol of Wash­ing­ton.

With tax re­form up next, Demo­crats see the po­ten­tial for an­oth­er ma­jor data point to add to their ar­gu­ment.

“If he con­tin­ues along those lines and does tax breaks for his bud­dies and his cronies and the people like he has sit­ting around his Cab­in­et, that’s go­ing to be a prob­lem in a dis­trict like mine,” said Rep. Cheri Bus­tos of Illinois, who co­chairs the Demo­crat­ic Policy and Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mit­tee and who holds a rur­al seat car­ried by Trump. “We don’t have a whole lot of mil­lion­aires and I don’t think we have any bil­lion­aires.”

Rep. Denny Heck of Wash­ing­ton, who heads re­cruit­ment for the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, called the health care bill “a $600 bil­lion tax cut for the very wealth­i­est of Amer­ic­ans” and warned that Re­pub­lic­ans will fail again if their tax-code-re­form ef­forts end up help­ing the rich “at the ex­pense of vul­ner­able people.”

“If they keep try­ing to do things that Amer­ica doesn’t want, then they’ll be held ac­count­able—very straight­for­ward,” Heck said.

At a press con­fer­ence Tues­day morn­ing at their na­tion­al party headquar­ters, House Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship blas­ted Trump and House Re­pub­lic­ans as char­lat­ans for cam­paign­ing on plans to boost blue-col­lar voters, then de­clin­ing to put forth ma­jor le­gis­la­tion to be­ne­fit them in the first 67 days.

They con­tras­ted the stim­u­lus pack­age and Lilly Led­bet­ter Fair Pay Act that were passed in the first month of a Demo­crat­ic-con­trolled gov­ern­ment in 2009 to the mil­lions of work­ing fam­il­ies who could be left un­in­sured un­der the GOP’s health plan.

Mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans in af­flu­ent, sub­urb­an swing seats made head­lines as they aban­doned the re­peal. But Demo­crats also noted it would have been es­pe­cially det­ri­ment­al to rur­al con­stitu­en­cies. Dis­tricts like those held by Re­pub­lic­an Reps. Sean Duffy of Wis­con­sin and Bruce Poli­quin of Maine, which are more than 70 per­cent rur­al and both backed Trump hand­ily, would have lost more in tax cred­its than neigh­bor­ing urb­an dis­tricts.

“At some point they’re go­ing to start fig­ur­ing out—’Wait a minute, this was just a whole bunch of cam­paign hype out there,’” Demo­crat­ic Rep. Ron Kind said, cit­ing the “dev­ast­at­ing” im­pact that both the Obama­care re­peal and Trump’s budget would have on his rur­al Wis­con­sin dis­trict, which the pres­id­ent won.

Demo­crats have already star­ted mak­ing that case to midterm voters. The Caucus policy com­mit­tee has hit Trump’s budget for its pro­posed cuts to pro­grams that provide rur­al job-train­ing and in­fra­struc­ture fund­ing. The DCCC launched a five-fig­ure di­git­al ad cam­paign blast­ing Re­pub­lic­ans who voted the health care bill out of com­mit­tee, and it re­leased a poll con­duc­ted this month of 1,000 voters in 52 battle­ground dis­tricts that found 54 per­cent op­posed to the GOP plan and only 30 per­cent in fa­vor.

Still, it’s not clear if Trump and House Re­pub­lic­ans are on the same page when it comes to tax re­form. On the cam­paign trail, the pres­id­ent em­phas­ized help for the middle and work­ing classes, but the con­gres­sion­al plan is ex­pec­ted to bring less re­lief to those groups.

Rep. Linda Sánchez of Cali­for­nia, one of six Demo­crats on the tax policy sub­com­mit­tee, said House Re­pub­lic­ans are craft­ing their bill in secrecy, leav­ing her skep­tic­al that the GOP plans to take tax re­form in a dir­ec­tion that would be­ne­fit work­ing fam­il­ies.

“I have been beg­ging our chair­man. I have been beg­ging our Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues to try to in­vite us in on that con­ver­sa­tion,” said Sanc­hez, the vice chair­wo­man of the House Demo­crat­ic Caucus.

Re­pub­lic­ans in­sisted there is still time to chal­lenge a nar­rat­ive that their policies are at odds with the pop­u­list bloc that elec­ted them. House Rules Chair Pete Ses­sions of Texas said Demo­crats have to wait un­til next Oc­to­ber be­fore writ­ing the book on GOP pri­or­it­ies.

Trump’s pro­posed tril­lion-dol­lar in­fra­struc­ture plan could provide a le­gis­lat­ive vic­tory, an eco­nom­ic stim­u­lus, and a chance to work with Demo­crats in one hit. And House GOP lead­er­ship an­nounced Tues­day its in­tent to keep work­ing on an Obama­care-re­peal plan.

“I don’t think in any way this is an in­dic­a­tion that we’re not go­ing to rally back with a good plan that would be good for not only the middle class but every single per­son that needs a bet­ter health care sys­tem,” said Ses­sions, a former two-term chair of the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee.

From the start, Demo­crats have said they have to run on more than an anti-Trump plat­form even as con­tro­ver­sial le­gis­lat­ive plans take shape. The party has plenty to of­fer work­ing-class Amer­ic­ans, Demo­crats said, they just have to work harder to make sure voters are aware.

Bus­tos poin­ted to le­gis­la­tion she’s worked on to boost ex­port cen­ters for small busi­nesses and use Amer­ic­an steel in wa­ter-in­fra­struc­ture pro­jects.

“Go on the back of a pickup truck on the peri­met­er of a corn field and just sit down and talk about what we are do­ing,” she sug­ges­ted. “Let people know that not only have we not for­got­ten them, but we are fight­ing for them.”

What We're Following See More »
ONLY TWO TOPICS
Giuliani: Mueller Has Agreed to Narrow Scope of Trump Interview
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Rudy Giuliani said Friday that special counsel Robert Mueller has agreed to narrow the scope of a potential interview with President Donald Trump from five topics to two. The former New York City mayor, who is now one of Trump's lawyers in the Russia investigation, told CNN's Chris Cuomo on New Day that Mueller is not considering asking the President about his former personal attorney Michael Cohen, who's under investigation in New York over his business dealings."

Source:
‘TERRIFYING TIME TO BE AN AMERICAN”
Law Enforcement Source: Reports of Cohen’s Suspicious Activity Disappeared
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Michael Cohen's financial records, given to the media last week, were leaked by a law enforcement official who "had grown alarmed after being unable to find two important reports on Cohen’s financial activity in a government database. The official, worried that the information was being withheld from law enforcement, released the remaining documents." He told the New Yorker: "This is a terrifying time to be an American."

Source:
CONTRADICTS HOUSE INTEL
Senate Intel Says Russians Intervened to Help Trump
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CITES SOUTH KOREA-U.S. EXERCISES
North Korea Threatens to Cancel Summit
4 days ago
THE LATEST
U.S. COMPANIES HAD BEEN BANNED FROM SELLING
Trump Trying to Negotiate Way Forward for ZTE
6 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump said he was working with Chinese President Xi Jinping to keep ZTE Corp. in business, throwing an extraordinary lifeline to the Chinese telecommunication giant that has been laid low by U.S. moves to cut off its suppliers. The surprise intervention comes less than a month after ZTE was hit with an order banning U.S. companies from selling components to the Chinese business."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login