OFF TO THE RACES

Republicans Weigh Their RyanCare Votes

House members in swing districts may get a primary challenge if they vote in favor. But a “no” vote would be a death sentence from the base.

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
Charlie Cook
March 20, 2017, 8 p.m.

More than a few House Re­pub­lic­ans are likely to be tak­ing deep breaths as they board the sub­way from the Long­worth or Ray­burn House Of­fice Build­ings to the Cap­it­ol on Thursday to vote on the Amer­ic­an Health Care Act. They know that they will be cast­ing a fate­ful vote on a bill that no one really likes and, giv­en the lack of af­fec­tion for it in the Sen­ate, one that is ex­tremely un­likely to be signed in­to law in its present form.

Staunch con­ser­vat­ives don’t like it, some dis­miss­ing it as “Obama­care Lite,” while oth­er law­makers, mostly mod­er­ates or those rep­res­ent­ing swing dis­tricts, fear a back­lash if they de­cap­it­ate Obama­care. For Demo­crats, the vote is a no-brain­er. All are ex­pec­ted to vote against it. The irony, of course, is that the Amer­ic­an Health Care Act, aka Ry­an­Care, is, like the Af­ford­able Care Act of 2010, aka Obama­care, a mon­grel of a piece of le­gis­la­tion, with ex­traneous bits ad­ded to at­tract votes and oth­er pieces tossed in to avoid los­ing votes.

What’s in­ter­est­ing is that Amer­ic­ans have a de­cidedly mixed view of Obama­care. The March 12-14 Fox News Poll showed its fa­vor­able rat­ings only barely high­er than its un­fa­vor­able ones, 50 to 47 per­cent, and strongly un­fa­vor­able views ex­ceeded strongly fa­vor­able ones by 36 to 26 per­cent. When Fox asked people wheth­er they “fa­vor or op­pose the Re­pub­lic­an health care plan that would re­place Obama­care,” just 34 per­cent were in fa­vor and 54 per­cent were op­posed, with strongly un­fa­vor­able views out­strip­ping strongly un­fa­vor­able ones, 40-17 per­cent. Of the 54 per­cent op­posed to the GOP plan, 67 per­cent said it was be­cause it made too many changes to Obama­care, while 21 per­cent said it didn’t make enough changes.

The Fox News poll showed that 92 per­cent of re­gistered voters cur­rently have some kind of health in­sur­ance: 51 per­cent re­ceive it from their em­ploy­er, 15 per­cent pay for them­selves, and 27 per­cent re­ceive it through a gov­ern­ment pro­gram like Medi­care or Medi­caid. Thirty-five per­cent rated the qual­ity of their cur­rent health in­sur­ance “ex­cel­lent,” 42 per­cent “good,” 16 per­cent “only fair,” and 6 per­cent “poor.” That means 77 per­cent think their health in­sur­ance is good or ex­cel­lent and 22 per­cent rate it fair to poor.

Ry­an­Care faces the same pub­lic per­cep­tion prob­lem that af­flic­ted Obama­care sev­en years ago: People are deeply mis­trust­ful of politi­cians and gov­ern­ment fid­dling with their health care. Many didn’t much like it when Demo­crats made whole­sale changes, and they took out their frus­tra­tions in the 2010 and 2014 midterm elec­tions. Now they’re un­happy that Pres­id­ent Trump, House Speak­er Paul Ry­an, and oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans are mess­ing with their health care. Demo­crat­ic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia told MS­N­BC last month that “a lot of people didn’t really know, and still don’t know, how they got health care … but I as­sure you they’ll know how they got rid of it.”

I can­vassed four of the smartest Re­pub­lic­an con­sult­ants last week on this ques­tion: “What would you guess that un­named Re­pub­lic­an strategists are telling their cli­ents about health care votes next week, ac­know­ledging that every­one is in a dif­fer­ent situ­ation?”

One said he thought Re­pub­lic­ans were be­ing ad­vised to vote in fa­vor. “You will get no cred­it with I’s and D’s for op­pos­ing it; they will still vote against you in ‘18 re­gard­less of how you vote. At the same time, a ‘no’ vote guar­an­tees a GOP primary op­pon­ent. You are go­ing to be tied to Trump and his policies no mat­ter how of­ten you try to stay in­de­pend­ent. Bet­ter to suck it up and pre­pare for war with the Demo­crats in ‘18.”

An­oth­er took a sim­il­ar tack: “We have to re­peal Obama­care and re­place it. Not re­peal­ing will kill us with the base in 2018, and not re­pla­cing it will kill us with swing voters and low-propensity turnout Trump voters.”

Said a third: “I know strategists who worry about the Re­pub­lic­an Party’s repu­ta­tion as a whole are telling their cli­ents that we will look ut­terly im­pot­ent if we can’t come up with a re­place­ment for Obama­care after prom­ising to do so for the past six years.”

The fourth offered a more nu­anced an­swer: “Not many Re­pub­lic­ans are go­ing to worry about a primary op­pon­ent who hits them for hav­ing cut be­ne­fits from de­serving re­cip­i­ents. They’re go­ing to be more wor­ried about not do­ing enough to un­der­cut Obama­care—they need to worry about the ‘not con­ser­vat­ive enough’ angle on whatever it is they do.”

He con­tin­ued, “But if you’re in a swing dis­trict or state, you’ve got that prob­lem plus the prob­lem of a chal­lenge that you hurt mid- to low-in­come people and your vote cost them their health in­sur­ance. Then a ‘no’ vote would be easi­er than a ‘yes’ vote be­cause you can shift the reas­ons why you voted against it, say­ing in a primary that it was im­per­fect be­cause it did not do enough and in the gen­er­al be­cause it did too much.”

What We're Following See More »
AT ISSUE: COMEY FIRING, SESSIONS’S RECUSAL
Mueller Seeks Documents from DOJ
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Special counsel Robert Mueller "is now demanding documents from the department overseeing his investigation." A source tells ABC News that "Mueller's investigators are keen to obtain emails related to the firing of FBI Director James Comey and the earlier decision of Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the entire matter."

Source:
MULVANEY SAYS PROVISION ISN’T A DEALBREAKER
Trump May Be OK with Dropping Mandate Repeal
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump would not insist on including repeal of an Obama-era health insurance mandate in a bill intended to enact the biggest overhaul of the tax code since the 1980s, a senior White House aide said on Sunday. The version of tax legislation put forward by Senate Republican leaders would remove a requirement in former President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law that taxes Americans who decline to buy health insurance."

Source:
FRANKEN JUST THE BEGINNING?
Media Devoting More Resources to Lawmakers’ Sexual Misconduct
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of Congress with histories of mistreating women should be extremely nervous. Major outlets, including CNN, are dedicating substantial newsroom resources to investigating sexual harassment allegations against numerous lawmakers. A Republican source told me he's gotten calls from well-known D.C. reporters who are gathering stories about sleazy members."

Source:
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
4 days ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
4 days ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login