Lawmakers Propose Self Plus One Option for Federal Health Program

This December 2, 2013 photo shows a woman reading the HealthCare.gov insurance marketplace internet site in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Kellie Lunney, Government Executive
Add to Briefcase
Kellie Lunney, Government Executive
Dec. 11, 2013, 10:50 a.m.

The bi­par­tis­an budget pro­pos­al an­nounced Tues­day would pave the way for a “self plus one” cov­er­age op­tion un­der the fed­er­al em­ploy­ee health in­sur­ance pro­gram.

A pro­vi­sion in the $85 bil­lion deal un­veiled by Rep. Paul Ry­an, R-Wis., and Sen. Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash., would al­low the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment to “mod­ern­ize” the Fed­er­al Em­ploy­ees Health Be­ne­fits Pro­gram by ex­pand­ing the menu of en­roll­ment op­tions. FE­HBP cur­rently of­fers self-only and fam­ily cov­er­age; en­rollees with spouses and no de­pend­ents must choose the fam­ily plan to re­ceive cov­er­age for their spouse. The Fed­er­al Em­ploy­ees Dent­al and Vis­ion In­sur­ance Pro­gram, or FED­VIP, has had a self plus one op­tion since 2004.

The ad­di­tion of self plus one cov­er­age “would align the FE­HB pro­gram with the com­mer­cial mar­ket and serve to spread costs across dif­fer­ent en­roll­ment types,” a sec­tion-by-sec­tion ana­lys­is of the budget pro­pos­al stated. FE­HBP provides health care be­ne­fits to 8.2 mil­lion fed­er­al em­ploy­ees, re­tir­ees and their de­pend­ents.

The House could vote on the le­gis­la­tion, which par­tially re­peals the se­quester for two years, be­fore it ad­journs on Dec. 13. The bill also would re­quire new ci­vil­ian fed­er­al work­ers and work­ing-age mil­it­ary re­tir­ees to con­trib­ute more to their pen­sions.

Fed­er­al em­ploy­ees and their ad­voc­ates long have com­plained about the lack of a self plus one op­tion in FE­HBP. Em­ploy­ees with spouses and no de­pend­ents have balked at hav­ing to pay more for a fam­ily plan when they don’t have any chil­dren. But it’s not clear a self plus one op­tion would be any cheap­er for en­rollees since that demo­graph­ic — em­ploy­ees with a spouse and no de­pend­ents — tends to be older and more ex­pens­ive to in­sure than a young couple with chil­dren, ac­cord­ing to OPM’s ana­lys­is. The agency has long stud­ied the costs and be­ne­fits of of­fer­ing self plus one.

“The self plus one premi­um would be based on the health cost of this group,” states OPM in its on­line Fre­quently Asked Ques­tions sec­tion. “For this reas­on, it is not clear that adding ad­di­tion­al en­roll­ment op­tions to the FE­HB Pro­gram would res­ult in any sig­ni­fic­ant be­ne­fit to those who ask for the change. In fact, they might be worse off.” The budget le­gis­la­tion would re­quire OPM to do an ac­tu­ar­ial ana­lys­is of the cost to self plus one be­ne­fi­ciar­ies for the first year of en­roll­ment.

Ex­pand­ing the health cov­er­age op­tions for fed­er­al work­ers has many sup­port­ers, in­clud­ing some em­ploy­ee and re­tir­ee ad­voc­ates and White House of­fi­cials. Pres­id­ent Obama in­cluded a pro­vi­sion to of­fer self plus one in FE­HBP in his fisc­al 2014 budget pro­pos­al. The Na­tion­al Act­ive and Re­tired Fed­er­al Em­ploy­ees As­so­ci­ation and the Fed­er­al Man­agers As­so­ci­ation praised the self plus one pro­vi­sion in the Ry­an-Mur­ray budget pro­pos­al.

“We be­lieve firmly in the prin­ciple of of­fer­ing an equit­able and af­ford­able fed­er­al be­ne­fits pack­age that will best meet the needs of all fed­er­al em­ploy­ees,” said Greg Stan­ford, dir­ect­or of gov­ern­ment and pub­lic af­fairs at the Fed­er­al Man­agers As­so­ci­ation. “Es­tab­lish­ing a self plus one op­tion with­in FE­HBP has been on FMA’s le­gis­lat­ive agenda for sev­er­al years, so we are ap­pre­ci­at­ive that it is in­cluded as part of the budget deal.”

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
3 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login