Russia Is Fielding Nuclear-Capable Missiles in Territory Bordering NATO

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Dec. 17, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

Rus­sia on Monday re­vealed it had sent bal­list­ic mis­siles to ter­rit­ory that bor­ders sev­er­al NATO na­tions, all of which have voiced alarm over the de­ploy­ment.

Nuc­le­ar-cap­able Iskander mis­siles are be­ing fielded in the Ka­lin­in­grad re­gion — a Rus­si­an ex­clave that bor­ders NATO mem­ber states Po­land and Lithuania, the Rus­si­an De­fense Min­istry dis­closed. The non­stra­tegic mis­siles have top ranges of between 250 and 310 miles, ac­cord­ing to vari­ous me­dia re­ports.

It is not presently known if the mis­siles fielded in the Ka­lin­in­grad are equipped with nuc­le­ar or con­ven­tion­al war­heads. It is also not clear how long they have been de­ployed or what caused Mo­scow to dis­cuss their field­ing, the New York Times re­por­ted

“Iskander rock­et com­plexes are in­deed stand­ing armed with the rock­et and ar­til­lery di­vi­sions in the West­ern Mil­it­ary Dis­trict,” a re­gion that en­com­passes Ka­lin­in­grad, min­istry spokes­man Ig­or Konashen­kov said.

An an­onym­ous high-rank­ing Rus­si­an army of­fi­cial told Izves­tia the mis­siles had been fielded in the area for more than a year.

Mo­scow has warned for a while that it could de­ploy Iskander mis­siles to the Ka­lin­in­grad re­gion in re­sponse to NATO’s on­go­ing ef­forts to con­struct an al­li­ance-wide bal­list­ic mis­sile shield.

Rus­sia has par­tic­u­larly op­posed a U.S. ini­ti­at­ive to field by about 2018 next-gen­er­a­tion mis­sile in­ter­cept­ors in Po­land. Wash­ing­ton main­tains that the in­ter­cept­ors will be fo­cused on coun­ter­ing po­ten­tial me­di­um-range mis­sile as­saults from Ir­an. Rus­sia has called for — to no avail thus far — leg­ally bind­ing as­sur­ances that the U.S. in­ter­cept­ors will nev­er be aimed against its own stra­tegic mis­siles.

U.S. De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel in a Monday video-con­fer­ence with his Rus­si­an op­pos­ite, Sergei Shoigu, said that Wash­ing­ton and NATO would con­tin­ue to de­vel­op the mis­sile shield re­gard­less of re­cent head­way made in resolv­ing long­stand­ing in­ter­na­tion­al con­cerns about Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar cap­ab­il­it­ies, the Xin­hua News Agency re­por­ted.

The Pol­ish De­fense Min­istry said the Iskander de­ploy­ment was “dis­turb­ing” and could lead to “con­sulta­tions and ac­tion … at the NATO and EU level,” Agence France-Presse re­por­ted. Fel­low NATO coun­tries Es­to­nia, Latvia, Lithuania and the United States also have voiced wor­ries about the mis­siles.

“We’ve shared with Rus­sia the con­cerns that coun­tries in the neigh­bor­hood have” re­gard­ing the Iskander de­ploy­ment, U.S. State De­part­ment spokes­wo­man Mar­ie Harf was quoted by the Wall Street Journ­al as say­ing. “We’ve urged Mo­scow to take no steps to destabil­ize the re­gion.”

Latvi­an De­fense Min­is­ter Artis Pab­riks said the mis­siles do “not change the bal­ance of power between NATO and Rus­sia, but it changes bal­ance of power in the re­gion. It threatens sev­er­al Balt­ic cit­ies,” he con­tin­ued in re­marks re­por­ted by AFP.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

FUNERAL FOR ISRAELI LEADER
Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many New Voters Does the Clinton Campaign Aim to Register?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."

Source:
“STANDING FOR PRINCIPLES”
Chicago Tribune Endorses Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.

Source:
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×