Labor Ready to Fight for Minimum-Wage Hike

But bill is likely to die in the Senate, despite Democrats’ push.

WASHINGTON - APRIL 18: AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka speaks during a rally at the Lafayette Square, north of the White House, April 18, 2011 in Washington, DC. Energy Action Coalition held a rally and a march to protest against corporations that pay no federal taxes. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Michael Catalin
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalin
Jan. 20, 2014, 2 p.m.

They won’t get much help from Sen­ate or House Re­pub­lic­ans, but Demo­crats in the Sen­ate will be get­ting a boost from a co­ali­tion of labor groups as law­makers take up a fed­er­al min­im­um-wage bill.

“We think that in or­der to sur­vive in today’s eco­nomy the min­im­um wage is com­pletely in­ad­equate. We think [rais­ing it is] a mor­al im­per­at­ive,” said AFL-CIO polit­ic­al dir­ect­or Mi­chael Pod­horzer. “We also think it’s an eco­nom­ic im­per­at­ive.”

Labor uni­ons sup­por­ted con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats in the de­bate over ex­tend­ing un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance be­fore Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans blocked their ef­forts last week. AFL-CIO Pres­id­ent Richard Trumka even at­ten­ded an event at the Cap­it­ol with House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, and sim­il­ar events sur­round­ing the min­im­um-wage push are likely.

Yet des­pite the strong, elec­tion-year in­terest by Sen­ate Demo­crats and their al­lies, the bill ap­pears destined to die in the Sen­ate.

Hik­ing the min­im­um wage, which was last raised more than four years ago, is not on House Re­pub­lic­ans’ agenda. Neither are Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans, angry over Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id’s strong-arm pro­ced­ur­al tac­tics, eager to let the meas­ure move for­ward.

“My read is that it fails to get 60 votes, which Re­id knows and hopes is the case, so that he can beat Re­pub­lic­ans over the head with it go­ing in­to the midterms,” one Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate aide said.

The Sen­ate meas­ure, sponsored by Re­id and Health, Edu­ca­tion, Labor, and Pen­sions Com­mit­tee Chair­man Tom Har­kin of Iowa, would boost the wage from the cur­rent level of $7.25 an hour to $10.10, in three in­cre­ments over two and a half years.

The bill, which by­passed the com­mit­tee pro­cess to cut off “em­bar­rass­ing” Re­pub­lic­an amend­ments, as Har­kin put it, is ex­pec­ted to make it to the floor some­time in Feb­ru­ary, ac­cord­ing to a Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic aide. The White House has en­dorsed the meas­ure.

“We view the fed­er­al min­im­um wage le­gis­la­tion as an ex­tremely im­port­ant first step,” Pod­horzer said. “We are act­ively in­volved in work­ing to in­crease the state min­im­um wages and work­ing to­ward a liv­ing wage.”

Yet op­pos­i­tion has already sur­faced. Sen. Lamar Al­ex­an­der, the rank­ing Re­pub­lic­an on the HELP Com­mit­tee, has philo­soph­ic­al ob­jec­tions to in­creas­ing the min­im­um wage, view­ing it as an eco­nom­ic drag.

“The min­im­um wage is a good-sound­ing at­tempt to fix the price of labor. In a mar­ket sys­tem, what that usu­ally does is cre­ate a short­age — it cre­ates less,” Al­ex­an­der said at a hear­ing on the min­im­um wage in June.

Some Re­pub­lic­ans also see a fed­er­al-versus-state is­sue. Sen. Richard Burr, a North Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­an and a mem­ber of the HELP Com­mit­tee, says he plans to vote against the meas­ure, ar­guing that wages should be set by states.

While Demo­crats would prefer to see the policy en­acted, they also be­lieve there’s a polit­ic­al ad­vant­age built in­to the is­sue for them. The min­im­um-wage in­crease is part of a lar­ger Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic push to fo­cus on eco­nom­ic is­sues they view as polit­ic­ally ad­vant­age­ous. That strategy will in­clude bring­ing the un­em­ploy­ment-ex­ten­sion bill that Re­pub­lic­ans blocked last week back to the floor, Demo­crats an­nounced last week.

“I think it’s really good policy and that’s what makes it good polit­ics,” Pod­horzer said. “I don’t think you’d have the kind of in­terest that’s driv­ing if it were just a cam­paign is­sue.”

But it is pos­sible to view the push for a min­im­um-wage hike and an ex­ten­sion of un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits as a Demo­crat­ic at­tempt to go on of­fense. In­deed, Re­id said last week he ex­pects con­stitu­ents to put pres­sure on Re­pub­lic­an law­makers dur­ing the break. At a re­cent event, Har­kin even in­voked a single moth­er who works two jobs to provide for her chil­dren, un­der­scor­ing the vis­cer­al nature the min­im­um-wage de­bate of­ten takes on.

“The Re­pub­lic­an Party may not un­der­stand the chal­lenges that this single moth­er is fa­cing, but the Amer­ic­an people cer­tainly do,” Har­kin said.

But Re­pub­lic­ans so far are un­fazed by the polit­ic­al joust­ing. Asked wheth­er he’s con­cerned that Re­id plans to turn the min­im­um wage in­to a polit­ic­al cudgel to use against the GOP, Burr smiled.

“He’s made a polit­ic­al is­sue out of everything,” Burr said. “That’s not an earth-shat­ter­ing thing.”

What We're Following See More »
CITE NEW REGULATIONS ON NON-PROFIT REPORTING
Dems on Finance Committee Get Cold Feet on IRS Nominee
56 minutes ago
THE LATEST
THE QUESTION
How Much Will Trump's Military Parade Cost?
1 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About $12 million, according to an initial estimate shared with CNN.

Source:
"NOT FOR LONG," HE SAYS
Trump Lashes Out at EU for Google Fine
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
ARMS CONTROL, SYRIA WERE DISCUSSED
Russians Refer to "Verbal Agreements" with Trump
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.

Source:
WAS "GRUDGINGLY" CONVINCED
Trump Was Shown Proof of Russian Interference Before Inauguration
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login