Multiple Nations Set to Finance Heightened Iran Monitoring

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Jan. 23, 2014, 9:01 a.m.

Glob­al en­voys said mul­tiple na­tions ap­peared ready to of­fer funds on Fri­day for an in­tens­i­fied nuc­le­ar-mon­it­or­ing re­gime in Ir­an, Re­u­ters re­ports.

In­siders sug­ges­ted that the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency would have little prob­lem gath­er­ing con­tri­bu­tions for veri­fy­ing Ir­an’s com­pli­ance with fresh nuc­le­ar re­stric­tions that took ef­fect this week. The U.N. or­gan­iz­a­tion plans on Fri­day to con­vene a spe­cial gath­er­ing to ad­dress veri­fic­a­tion du­ties it re­ceived un­der a six-month ac­cord, reached two months ago by Ir­a­ni­an ne­go­ti­at­ors and their in­ter­na­tion­al coun­ter­parts.

Po­ten­tial fun­ders re­portedly in­clude some less siz­able West­ern coun­tries, in ad­di­tion to the Novem­ber deal’s key ne­go­ti­at­ors: China, France, Ger­many, Rus­sia, the United King­dom and the United States.

The U.N. nuc­le­ar watch­dog agency has long con­duc­ted in­spec­tions in Ir­an and else­where to help en­sure that nuc­le­ar as­sets in peace­ful en­ergy pro­grams are not di­ver­ted for mil­it­ary use. IAEA audits in the Middle East­ern na­tion are ex­pec­ted to be­come more fre­quent as a res­ult of the in­ter­im atom­ic ac­cord.

IAEA safe­guards chief Tero Var­jor­anta last week said the agency would “roughly double” its quant­ity of per­son­nel in Ir­an to sup­port veri­fic­a­tion of the half-year deal. Wash­ing­ton and its al­lies see the short-term agree­ment as a po­ten­tial first step to­ward de­fus­ing fears that Tehran is secretly pur­su­ing a nuc­le­ar-arms cap­ab­il­ity.

The agency would need $8.2 mil­lion for the ad­di­tion­al in­spec­tions, ac­cord­ing to an un­re­leased es­tim­ate that the U.N. or­gan­iz­a­tion cir­cu­lated to mem­ber na­tions last week. Of that amount, $7.5 mil­lion must come from “ex­trabudget­ary vol­un­tary con­tri­bu­tions.”

The agency this year plans to spend $470.6 mil­lion on its activ­it­ies; about one-third of the funds would sup­port in­spec­tions.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP’S ATTORNEY WAS SET TO TESTIFY ON WEDNESDAY
Senate Intel Postpones Testimony by Cohen
1 days ago
THE LATEST
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
INTERVIEWED BY COMMITTEE STAFF
Lewandowski Meets with Senate Intelligence Committee
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski appeared on Capitol Hill for a closed-door interview with the Senate intelligence committee Wednesday, according to a source familiar with the matter. Lewandowski is the latest senior official in Trump's orbit who has met with the committee as part of its investigation into Russian election meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign."

Source:
FISHING EXPEDITION
Some Members Seek to Wrap Up Russia Investigations by Year’s End
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"A growing number of key Republicans are sending this message to the leaders of the congressional committees investigating potential Trump campaign collusion with the Russians: Wrap it up soon. In the House and Senate, several Republicans who sit on key committees are starting to grumble that the investigations have spanned the better part of the past nine months, contending that the Democratic push to extend the investigation well into next year could amount to a fishing expedition."

Source:
WROTE LAW THAT WEAKENED OPIOID OVERSIGHT
Trump: Marino Withdrawing Nomination for Drug Czar
4 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login