The Internet Revolt Starts Tuesday

Major websites are launching a mass anti-NSA protest next week.

A portrait of Edward Snowden declaring him a 'hero' is seen during a protest against government surveillance on October 26, 2013 in Washington, DC. The disclosures of widespread surveillance by the US National Security Agency of US allies has caused an international uproar, with leaders in Europe and Latin America demanding an accounting from the United States. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
Feb. 6, 2014, 6:05 a.m.

Circle Feb. 11 on your cal­en­dar. You’re go­ing to no­tice something a little dif­fer­ent when brows­ing the In­ter­net that day.

Thou­sands of civil-liberty and on­line-free­dom groups and web­sites will take to the di­git­al streets next week to wage a co­ordin­ated war against the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s spy­ing powers, a battle strike re­min­is­cent of a vir­tu­al protest that two years ago killed an on­line pir­acy bill.

Billing the protest as “The Day We Fight Back,” or­gan­izers are prom­ising ban­ners will be prom­in­ently dis­played on web­sites across the In­ter­net ur­ging users to en­gage in vir­al activ­ity ex­press­ing their op­pos­i­tion to the NSA. Ad­di­tion­ally, those ban­ners will ask read­ers to flood the tele­phone lines and email in-boxes of con­gres­sion­al of­fices to voice their sup­port of the Free­dom Act, a bill in Con­gress that aims to re­strict the gov­ern­ment’s sur­veil­lance au­thor­ity.

The roster of par­ti­cip­at­ing groups, which or­gan­izers say now tops 4,000, in­cludes the Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on, Red­dit, Tumblr, Moz­illa, DailyKos, and Am­nesty In­ter­na­tion­al.

“The ul­ti­mate goal is to provide more es­teem for the USA Free­dom Act and oth­er meas­ures and to en­sure that [Sen. Di­anne] Fein­stein’s so-called FISA Im­prove­ments Act nev­er sees the light of day,” said Dav­id Segal, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of De­mand Pro­gress, a left­ist group forged in the cru­cible of an earli­er wave of In­ter­net act­iv­ism that fam­ously killed the Stop On­line Pir­acy Act and the Pro­tect IP Act in 2012.

Segal likens next week’s di­git­al day of ac­tion to the anti-SOPA black­out that found Google, Wiki­pe­dia, and thou­sands of oth­er pop­u­lar sites de­lib­er­ately shut­ting down for a day to protest the le­gis­la­tion. There won’t be a black­out this time, but Segal didn’t rule out the pos­sib­il­ity of that down the road.

“To get to the [SOPA] black­out it re­quired three, four, five pushes to al­low al­lies to co­alesce and ex­press enough con­cerns about the le­gis­la­tion,” Segal said.

The protest’s or­gan­izers want to vo­cal­ize their dis­dain for Fein­stein’s bill, which crit­ics de­ride as a meas­ure to co­di­fy ex­ist­ing NSA pro­grams, but they say their main in­terest in sup­port­ing a sep­ar­ate meas­ure is a show of sup­port for the Free­dom Act.

The Free­dom Act — in­tro­duced late last year by Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner of Wis­con­sin, a former Pat­ri­ot Act au­thor — would lim­it the gov­ern­ment’s bulk col­lec­tion of tele­phone metadata, in­stall a pri­vacy ad­voc­ate in the secret For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court, and de­mand ad­di­tion­al trans­par­ency from the NSA. It cur­rently has 130 co­spon­sors in the House, and there is a mir­ror bill in the Sen­ate be­ing pushed by Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Patrick Leahy.

The bill cur­rently awaits judg­ment in the House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee, which held a hear­ing earli­er this week to ex­am­ine po­ten­tial av­en­ues for NSA re­form.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
15 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×