Senators will focus on crude-by-rail safety next week in a hearing that arrives on the heels of a federal investigation indicating that improper labeling and packaging of crude-oil rail shipments may be widespread.
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller said Thursday that the Feb. 13 hearing before the Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine Infrastructure, Safety, and Security Subcommittee will focus on passenger and freight rail safety.
Risks involved in shipping crude oil in rail cars are sure to come up as well. According to a press release announcing the hearing, subcommittee members will discuss “recent high-profile rail accidents, positive train control implementation and other key safety challenges.”
Rail safety has been the subject of heightened scrutiny in recent months following a series of derailments involving tank cars carrying crude oil sourced from North Dakota’s Bakken Formation. In December, a train carrying crude ran off the tracks in Casselton, N.D., sparking a massive fireball and an explosion.
Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., said in an interview that federal regulators will be present at the hearing along with stakeholders from the rail and energy industries.
Hoeven also said that he hopes funding can be found for the Transportation Department to provide more rail and crude-shipment safety inspections.
“This is an extremely important issue right now and we’ve got to make sure this is safe,” Hoeven said. “We’re working on the fiscal year 2015 appropriations bill on the Appropriations Committee, so I’ll work to make sure there’s funding for more track inspectors in the Department of Transportation budget.”
Hoeven believes his bid to increase inspections will win support from federal regulators and members of Congress.
“There’s a recognition that we’re moving a lot more crude by rail and we all need to work together to minimize the risk of fire or an explosion, and that means making sure that the tracks are safe and making sure that things are loaded and shipped properly,” he said.
What We're Following See More »
The Supreme Court announced "that it would consider a challenge to President Trump’s latest effort to limit travel from countries said to pose a threat to the nation’s security." The case concerns Trump's most recent attempt to make good on a campaign promise "tainted by religious animus" and only questionably justified by national security concerns. The decision to take the case, called Trump v. Hawaii, comes almost exactly a year after Trump issued the first travel ban. The ban under consideration affects Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea.
Trump wants to move the two grants, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas grant and the Drug Free Communities Act, to the Justice and Health and Human Services departments, respectively. This would result in a $300 million plus reduction in funding, about 95 percent of the cost of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. "'I’m baffled at the idea of cutting the office or reducing it significantly and taking away its programs in the middle of an epidemic,'" said Regina LaBelle, who served as ONDCP chief of staff during the Obama administration. This is the second time the Trump Administration has proposed gutting the agency.
A new report assembled by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has identified more than 500 potential conflicts of interest in President Trump's first year. First, the report notes, Trump spent 122 days at his properties during his first year. He has been accompanied by 70 federal officials and 30 members of Congress. "Second, far from this signaled access to power being an empty promise, those who patronize President Trump’s businesses have, in fact, gained access to the president and his inner circle." Lastly, about 40 special interest groups and 11 foreign governments have held events at Trump properties.