A coalition of Senate Democrats is pushing to shine a spotlight on climate change in the media. And they want scientists to play a starring role.
“When you talk about getting media attention it’s important to also talk about who should be participating in that discussion,” said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., a member of the newly minted Senate Climate Action Task Force. “We’ll be working to bring more voices into the conversation and that will certainly include scientists.”
Last month, members of the task force, a group of Senate Democrats committed to climate action, sent a letter to the heads of major television networks, including ABC, CBS and NBC, asking them to give more media attention to climate change. The plea cited a study by left-leaning media watchdog Media Matters indicating that Sunday news shows spent only 27 minutes talking about climate change in the past year.
Members of the task force say the issue deserves increased attention in the news. But they don’t just want to spark debate, they want to shape the conversation.
“We want to make sure climate deniers and scientists do not get equal time. Media coverage needs to be decisively in favor of the facts, “Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, a member of the task force, said. “Making sure science is front and center in terms of media attention is certainly going to be part of our strategy.”
How do Democrats plan to raise the profile of scientists? To start, they’re looking to use good old fashioned PR.
“We need to work with scientists to pitch stories to the major media outlets that highlight the urgency of this issue,” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said. “Scientists aren’t always good at self-promotion so we’ve got to make sure that the consensus position finds its way onto the airwaves.”
Sen. Rob Menendez, D-N.J., another member of the task force, said he will encourage climate scientists “to do what they can to raise awareness about the facts that we all know to be true.”
There’s just one problem. Democrats can’t agree on whether scientists should wade into a debate over policy.
Schatz, who met with CBS President David Rhodes last month along with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., to discuss media coverage of climate change said scientists should be able to comment on the potential impact of policies designed to mitigate climate change.
Other members of the task force took a slightly different tack.
“It’s important for scientists to talk about the certainty of climate change but people need to hear from lawmakers about the different policy options we have for dealing with it,” Murphy said.
The extent to which Democrats can iron out differences of opinion may determine their ability to shape the conversation on climate change that’s playing out in the press.
Disagreement among Democrats is nothing new. Climate hawks like Boxer and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island routinely talk about climate change in the context of rising carbon emissions while more moderate Democrats like Sen. Mark Begich of Alaska believe the issue should be framed in terms of its cost to taxpayers.
The note of discord among task force members, however, shows that even among the most staunch advocates of climate action within the Democratic party, there remains a lack of consensus on how to win public support for the cause.
Similar tensions exist within the scientific community. For climate scientists, explaining the science behind climate change is uncontroversial, but talking about policy is a sticky subject.
“If you want to advocate for one policy or another that’s something that’s based not only on expertise but also on values so scientists need to be clear about what the science is and what their values are,” Dr. Gavin Schmidt, a climate scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said.
For now, science and ideology aren’t likely to part ways anytime soon.”Science and politics are always getting tangled up,” Dr. Daniel Sarewitz, co-director of Arizona State University’s Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, said. “The underlying point is that everyone wants to have science on their side. It lends a kind of natural authority that everyone gravitates toward.”
Regardless of a divide among lawmakers, Democrats in both chambers of Congress are advancing the message that climate change poses a real and substantial threat and requires immediate attention. Members of the House Safe Climate Caucus, led by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., announced last week that they would highlight the issue in weekly op-eds and youtube videos.
All this comes in the face of what has largely been Republican inaction, a feature of the debate that Democrats are quick to emphasize. “Republicans are doing nothing, but we will not be silenced,” Waxman said last week at an event to announce the new push for climate action.
What We're Following See More »
"The House on Friday overwhelmingly passed sweeping bipartisan opioid legislation, concluding the chamber’s two-week voteathon on dozens of bills to address the drug abuse epidemic. The measure combines more than 50 bills approved individually by the House focusing on expanding access to treatment, encouraging the development of alternative pain treatments and curbing the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. It was passed 396-14, with 13 Republicans and one Democrat voting against the package."
In a letter to Congress on Friday, President Trump wrote that he's continuing the national emergency status with respect to North Korea, citing the country's “provocative, destabilizing, and repressive actions," which "continue to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat” to the United States. In a series of tweets following his meeting with Kim Jong-un, Trump said Americans could sleep well at night because North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat.
"The U.S. Navy is preparing plans to construct sprawling detention centers for tens of thousands of immigrants on remote bases in California, Alabama and Arizona, escalating the military’s task in implementing President Donald Trump’s 'zero tolerance' policy for people caught crossing the Southern border." The document outlines plans for "temporary and austere" internment camps for 25,000 migrants "at abandoned airfields just outside the Florida panhandle," and in Alabama, for 47,000 people near San Francisco, and "as many as 47,000 people at Camp Pendleton" in California. The document estimates that operating a camp to detain 25,000 people for six months would cost approximately $233 million.
"Lasers have targeted pilots of American military aircraft operating over the western Pacific Ocean more than 20 times in recent months," said U.S. officials. The lasers appeared to be coming from Chinese fishing boats in the South China Sea, said the officials, which is the setting of a "long-running dispute between China and Japan over the control of nearby islands ... The incidents likely will come up as part of a broader discussion of issues when Defense Secretary Jim Mattis visits Beijing next week and meets Chinese President Xi Jinping."
"President Donald Trump has unveiled a new policy that depicts the world’s oceans as a resource ripe for expanded business opportunities, reversing the Obama administration's emphasis on protecting 'vulnerable' marine environments." Rather than emphasizing environmental protection, as Obama's policy did, "Trump’s directive speaks mostly to the oceans as a resource for promoting national security" and creating jobs.