Stabenow ‘Comfortable’ With Gas-Export Strategy

WASHINGTON - JUNE 22: Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) participates in a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing on June 22, 2010 in Washington, DC. The committee is hearing testimony on policies that would reduce oil consumption through the promotion of accelerated deployment of electric-drive vehicles. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Amy Harder
Add to Briefcase
Amy Harder
Feb. 11, 2014, 10:23 a.m.

After ex­press­ing con­cerns for months that Pres­id­ent Obama was mov­ing too fast ap­prov­ing ex­ports of nat­ur­al gas, a seni­or Sen­ate Demo­crat now says she’s “com­fort­able” with the strategy.

This shift in po­s­i­tion by Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan comes as the En­ergy De­part­ment on Tues­day green-lighted an­oth­er ap­plic­a­tion to ex­port nat­ur­al gas over­seas, the sixth such ap­prov­al in the last two years.

Stabenow, who chairs the Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee and is a mem­ber of the En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee, says she’s been talk­ing with En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz on this is­sue.

“I’ve been work­ing with the sec­ret­ary, and I’m com­fort­able with what he is talk­ing about as a strategy at this point longer-term,” Stabenow said Tues­day. “I’m not go­ing to ob­ject to this par­tic­u­lar one [ex­port li­cense]. I think we’re more on the same wavelength.”

Last month, Stabenow said she was con­sid­er­ing pla­cing a hold on Chris­toph­er Smith, an En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cial over­see­ing the ex­port policy who has been nom­in­ated as as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary for fossil en­ergy at DOE. “I am con­cerned that they are not un­der­stand­ing that they need to have a pause in the new ap­provals on fa­cil­it­ies un­til we see what im­pact the cur­rent ap­provals will have “¦ how it af­fects man­u­fac­tur­ing,” Stabenow said in Janu­ary.

On Tues­day, the En­ergy De­part­ment ap­proved a pro­ject in Louisi­ana to ex­port nat­ur­al gas to coun­tries that aren’t free-trade part­ners with the United States, a pro­cess that in­cludes more fed­er­al re­stric­tions than ex­ports to coun­tries that are free-trade part­ners with the U.S.

Stabenow’s com­ments were more pos­it­ive in re­ac­tion to Tues­day’s ap­prov­al than those of Dow Chem­ic­al, a glob­al com­pany headquartered in Michigan. Dow and oth­er man­u­fac­tur­ers that use nat­ur­al gas as a feed­stock, such as alu­min­um-maker Al­coa, are op­posed to in­creas­ing ex­ports too much out of con­cern it could raise do­mest­ic prices, which have been near re­cord lows be­cause of the nat­ur­al-gas boom in the last sev­er­al years.

In a state­ment Tues­day, Dow urged the ad­min­is­tra­tion to hit the pause but­ton on ap­prov­al of li­que­fied-nat­ur­al-gas ex­ports to coun­tries that don’t have free-trade agree­ments with the United States. More than 20 such ap­plic­a­tions are pending at the En­ergy De­part­ment.

“Mov­ing for­ward, we re­com­mend that DOE strongly con­siders tak­ing a pause in the LNG ex­port ap­prov­al pro­cess to fully un­der­stand the long-term im­plic­a­tions of these ap­provals,” a Dow spokes­per­son said in an email. “As nat­ur­al gas prices con­tin­ue to rise over 30 per­cent, it will demon­strate to the Amer­ic­an pub­lic that DOE is com­mit­ted to put­ting the con­sumer be­fore the oil and gas in­dustry.”

Some en­ergy ana­lysts pre­dict the En­ergy De­part­ment may in­deed move for­ward with this “pause” ap­proach on fu­ture ap­provals, which have been com­ing at semi-reg­u­lar in­ter­vals every few months. But Stabenow said Mon­iz had not com­mit­ted to her verbally that he was plan­ning such a pause.

Clare Foran contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login