The Republican chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee announced Thursday that he will not seek reelection in November, spelling an end to his two-decade run in Congress.
Rep. Doc Hastings of Washington was first elected to the House in 1994, the same year that Republicans won a majority for the first time in 40 years. He served as chairman of the House Ethics Committee from 2005 to 2007, and in 2011 he took over the gavel at Natural Resources, where he has served alternately as chair and ranking member.
Hastings has used the committee perch to strongly criticize White House energy policies. He has been a staunch advocate of expanding public lands to oil and natural-gas production and has accused the administration of overreach on energy and environmental regulation. Bills passed through the committee in recent years included measures to greatly increase onshore and offshore drilling, and to thwart planned Interior Department regulations on hydraulic fracturing and mountaintop mining.
Hastings said a desire to spend more time with family was the chief reason for his decision to leave Congress.
“Without question, my family weighed heavily in my decision,” he said in a statement. “[My wife and I] both look forward with anticipation to the time we will have together and with our family after my term ends in January.”
It’s unclear who will assume the chairmanship once Hastings gives up the gavel. Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, is the next most senior Republican member of the panel but is ineligible due to the fact that he has already served three terms as committee chair. The next most senior Republican committee member is Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas. Gohmert’s office did not immediately return a request for comment.
Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, also has seniority and could be a contender. When asked whether he would be interested in the chairmanship, Bishop didn’t rule it out. “There is still a full year of issues to be debated and passed under the leadership of Chairman Hastings,” Bishop said in a statement. “It’s premature to engage in those discussions right now. At the appropriate time I will comment further.”
What We're Following See More »
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.