California wants to help keep kids from creating Internet legacies they might never live down.
With young people increasingly posting every move they make (and every thought they think) online, and with Congress doing little in recent years to expand federal privacy protections, the state is moving to ensure that minor youthful indiscretions don’t haunt its young residents for years to come.
Starting next year, state law will require websites to offer an “eraser button” for minors — a provision aimed at enabling anyone under 18 to delete information they post online.
The measure — which also requires websites and apps to inform minors of their rights to have a post removed and to make it clear how to exercise those rights — is part of a decade-plus pattern in a state that is home to the world’s largest Internet companies and to some of the toughest online privacy regulations in the nation.
In 2002, California became the first state to pass a law requiring companies to notify customers if their data privacy has been breached. Today, 46 states plus the District of Columbia have data-breach notification laws, and Congress is considering a federal standard.
In 2003, the state passed the landmark California Online Privacy Protection Act, which requires all websites that collect personal information to post clear privacy policies.
Officials have been aggressive in enforcing the online privacy law: California Attorney General Kamala Harris has interpreted the legislation to cover not only websites but also mobile applications, and in 2012 she sent letters to 100 mobile apps that lacked adequate privacy statements. Thirty days later, Delta Airlines still hadn’t updated its app, so she sued.
Last year, Harris also successfully lobbied the Legislature to pass a law requiring sites and advertisers to disclose whether they honor “do-not-track” requests, forcing companies to reveal whether they are tracking users against their wishes.
Privacy advocates have celebrated California for leading the way on a critical issue.
“I think [California officials] recognize that the federal government has pretty much abdicated its responsibility to protect consumers,” said Justin Brookman, director of consumer privacy for the Center for Democracy and Technology.
And because of the global nature of the Internet, whatever California requires frequently becomes the standard for online businesses around the world.
Not everyone, however, is so thrilled with the state’s tough standards.
Critics argue that the eraser-button law creates a false sense of security for teens — there’s nothing the state can do, after all, to stop people from downloading embarrassing pictures from Facebook or retweeting an ill-advised tweet. And as many young people have learned, once content is shared on the Internet, it’s nearly impossible to take back, even if the original material is pulled.
Business groups also warn that California is in danger of strangling the industry that has provided a tremendous economic boost to the state and the entire nation.
But absent any action at the federal level, states have been left to their own devices, so to speak. Washington is doing little to protect the first generation in history with a 1-click option for ruining their lives, and California’s eraser-button law, however controversial, is an attempt to step into that breach.
What We're Following See More »
In town to receive the Mark Twain Prize for American Humor at the Kennedy Center, Bill Murray casually strolled into the White House Briefing Room this afternoon. A spokesman said he was at the executive mansion for a chat with President Obama, his fellow Chicagoan.
"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."