Off to the Races

GOP Establishment in a Tizzy

After Rubio’s robotic debate, no mainstream candidate looks ready to pull away.

Marco Rubio stumbles in New Hampshire
AP Photo/John Locher
Feb. 8, 2016, 8 p.m.

For lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an es­tab­lish­ment, things could not look much worse. They des­per­ately need one of the four con­ven­tion­al, main­stream can­did­ates—Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich, or Marco Ru­bio—to pull away and con­sol­id­ate that wing of the party, the way Ted Cruz has done on the Right. But after Ru­bio’s ro­bot­ic de­bate show­ing, it looks less likely now that the New Hamp­shire primary will win­now the field as much as they hoped.

We will all know a lot more by Tues­day night, but a few things are already ap­par­ent. While Don­ald Trump will al­most cer­tainly win the New Hamp­shire primary, he is not go­ing to dom­in­ate it or many oth­er places the way polls were show­ing just a month or two ago. Trump was av­er­aging about 35 per­cent of the GOP vote in Iowa, New Hamp­shire, and na­tion­ally, mean­ing that 65 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans were not for the bom­bast­ic real-es­tate mogul. Pre­sum­ably his sup­port­ers were fa­mil­i­ar with him, and they liked at least some of what he said, the way he said it, and the way he po­si­tioned him­self as an anti-politi­cian can­did­ate. That is still true, but knock about 10 points off his poll num­bers. He’s av­er­aging about 25 per­cent, with 75 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans not for him. So this is no longer Trump versus the field; this is just a steady Trump with about a quarter of the vote.

Ru­mors of the de­mise of Ben Car­son’s can­did­acy were pre­ma­ture, though ul­ti­mately not wrong. He is no longer a ma­jor factor in the race; he just hasn’t dropped out as Mike Hucka­bee, Rand Paul, and Rick San­tor­um have.

Es­tab­lish­ment Re­pub­lic­ans ser­i­ously doubt that Trump could win a gen­er­al elec­tion. Even if he did, they don’t think he has the faintest idea how to gov­ern or the tem­pera­ment to deal with Con­gress and world lead­ers. Mak­ing mat­ters worse, he has a simplist­ic and shal­low un­der­stand­ing of is­sues and pub­lic policy. But for all of the con­tempt they have for Trump, those same es­tab­lish­ment fig­ures des­pise Cruz. In 43 years in Wash­ing­ton, all on and around Cap­it­ol Hill, I have nev­er seen any­one ali­en­ate more people, in both cham­bers and on both sides of the aisle, more deeply than Cruz has. He thought it polit­ic­ally be­ne­fi­cial to ant­ag­on­ize the es­tab­lish­ment, and he did an amaz­ingly ef­fect­ive job of it, too well for his own good. So the es­tab­lish­ment is now faced with a po­ten­tial choice of shoot­ing it­self in the head or stabbing it­self in the heart (you can de­cide which man rep­res­ents each op­tion).  

None of the can­did­ates favored by the es­tab­lish­ment seems cap­able of pulling away from the oth­er three. After his sur­pris­ingly strong show­ing in Iowa, Ru­bio looked like he might do it, but his shock­ingly bad de­bate per­form­ance Sat­urday night squelched his mo­mentum in New Hamp­shire, and track­ing polls show him los­ing alti­tude. The same polling is show­ing both Bush and Kasich mov­ing up and passing Ru­bio. Christie’s strong de­bate per­form­ance and the abund­ance of late-de­cid­ing voters pre­clude writ­ing him off either.  

How much win­now­ing oc­curs de­pends on who comes in first among the four con­ven­tion­al can­did­ates, who is second, the size of the gap between the two, and wheth­er the third and fourth can­did­ates are in hail­ing range. Ru­bio will cer­tainly sur­vive New Hamp­shire, but for the oth­er three, it’s now or nev­er.

Ru­bio’s chal­lenge is how to re­gain his foot­ing as a smooth, ar­tic­u­late can­did­ate without ap­pear­ing overly pro­grammed. In the de­bate, he was a hu­man juke­box: Hit C-7 and you knew ex­actly what you’d hear. Staffers and con­sult­ants prize a can­did­ate who stays on mes­sage, but not to the point of sound­ing scrip­ted or ro­bot­ic. At a small din­ner that a group of us had with Ru­bio early last year, he came across as smart, poised, and dis­cip­lined, but a little too well-re­hearsed, a little too canned. At a sim­il­ar small din­ner in Ju­ly with Cruz, he was dis­cip­lined as well, but you could al­most see the wheels turn­ing in his head as he for­mu­lated an­swers. Noth­ing was canned with him.

If the es­tab­lish­ment doesn’t co­alesce be­hind a can­did­ate soon, it will have to fig­ure out a way to make peace with Cruz. He’d be hard to love, but pos­sible to tol­er­ate.

What We're Following See More »
HE WAS OBAMA'S HUD SECRETARY
Julian Castro Announces 2020 Exploratory Committee
31 minutes ago
THE LATEST
SHE NEEDS HALF OF THE TORIES TO VOTE FOR HER
Theresa May Faces Vote of No Confidence
53 minutes ago
THE LATEST
TRUMP TOWER, EMOLUMENTS, AND MORE
New York Attorney General Planning To Investigate Trump Family
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"New York Attorney Gen.-elect Letitia James says she plans to launch sweeping investigations into President Donald Trump, his family and 'anyone' in his circle who may have violated the law once she settles into her new job next month." James plans to investigate Trump's real estate holdings in New York, any government subsidies those businesses may have received, whether Trump has violated the emoluments clause, and "the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting." James also campaigned "on passing a bill to change New York's double jeopardy laws with an eye on possible pardons coming out of the White House."

Source:
HEADS TO HOUSE FOR FINAL PASSAGE
Senate Passes Farm Bill, 87-13
18 hours ago
THE LATEST
SAYS MCCONNELL
Senate To Take Up Criminal Justice
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

"Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that the Senate will take up criminal justice reform legislation as soon as this week, marking a win for President Donald Trump and a remarkable turnaround for the bill. The latest version of the measure could be released as soon as Tuesday, according to two sources familiar with the matter, and is likely to win over more Republican support on a plan that had sharply divided the GOP."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login