More Than a Dozen New Mexico Workers Show Radiation Exposure

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Feb. 27, 2014, 8:07 a.m.

Thir­teen per­son­nel at a New Mex­ico nuc­le­ar-waste site were found to have been ex­posed to heightened ra­di­ation after con­tam­in­ants es­caped in­to the air.

The signs showed up in bio­lo­gic­al ma­ter­i­als col­lec­ted from staffers on duty in sub­ter­ranean por­tions of the Waste Isol­a­tion Pi­lot Plant on Feb. 14, when an auto­mated sensor de­tec­ted air­borne ra­dio­act­ive particles in­side the New Mex­ico com­plex, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­ports. The in­cid­ent came 10 days after an equip­ment fire at the site, though a Wed­nes­day New York Times re­port sug­ges­ted the events were not re­lated.

No ex­tern­al in­dic­a­tions of con­tam­in­ants were dis­covered on work­ers on the day of the alert, AP re­por­ted. But bio­lo­gic­al samples were col­lec­ted and ini­tially tested to de­term­ine if work­ers had breathed in ra­dio­act­ive ma­ter­i­als.

“[Af­fected] em­ploy­ees, both fed­er­al and con­tract­or, will be asked to provide ad­di­tion­al samples in or­der to fully de­term­ine the ex­tent of any ex­pos­ure,” says a Wed­nes­day press re­lease from the U.S. En­ergy De­part­ment and the Nuc­le­ar Waste Part­ner­ship, the stor­age fa­cil­ity’s private op­er­at­or.

A Thursday af­ter­noon press con­fer­ence is ex­pec­ted at which En­ergy and con­tract­ing of­fi­cials are to ad­dress the mat­ter.

Over­seers have said air tests in­dic­ate that the air­borne con­tam­in­ants came from a broken waste tank, though an in-per­son as­sess­ment would be ne­ces­sary to identi­fy the rup­ture’s source, AP re­por­ted. A tank breach could have oc­curred if any site roof­ing had fallen in, or if a fork­lift had mis­takenly pierced a con­tain­er, Nuc­le­ar Waste Part­ner­ship head Farok Sharif said earli­er this week.

Ad­di­tion­al weeks may pass be­fore em­ploy­ees re-enter the fa­cil­ity’s be­low-ground stor­age area, the wire ser­vice quoted site ad­min­is­trat­ors as say­ing.

The En­ergy De­part­ment pre­vi­ously con­firmed that a quant­ity of ra­dio­act­ive con­tam­in­ants had also reached the site’s sur­face. However, Wed­nes­day’s Times re­port quoted fa­cil­ity staff and in­de­pend­ent ex­perts say­ing those amounts were min­im­al and rul­ing out any health im­pact for nearby res­id­ents. The waste fa­cil­ity is loc­ated less than 30 miles from the town of Carls­bad, N.M.

What We're Following See More »
SANS PROOF
NRA Chief: Leftist Protesters Are Paid
1 days ago
UPDATE
NEW TRAVEL BAN COMING SOON
Trump Still on Campaign Rhetoric
1 days ago
UPDATE
“WE’RE CHANGING IT”
Trump Rails On Obamacare
1 days ago
UPDATE

After spending a few minutes re-litigating the Democratic primary, Donald Trump turned his focus to Obamacare. “I inherited a mess, believe me. We also inherited a failed healthcare law that threatens our medical system with absolute and total catastrophe” he said. “I’ve been watching and nobody says it, but Obamacare doesn’t work.” He finished, "so we're going to repeal and replace Obamacare."

FAKE NEWS
Trump Goes After The Media
1 days ago
UPDATE

Donald Trump lobbed his first attack at the “dishonest media” about a minute into his speech, saying that the media would not appropriately cover the standing ovation that he received. “We are fighting the fake news,” he said, before doubling down on his previous claim that the press is “the enemy of the people." However, he made a distinction, saying that he doesn't think all media is the enemy, just the "fake news."

FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login