A top Transportation Department official and an industry executive defended rail safety on Thursday in the wake of a string of crude-by-rail accidents.
“New records in rail safety have been achieved four out of the past five years, and preliminary data indicates a new all-time best for 2013,” Federal Railroad Administrator Joseph Szabo said during a Senate subcommittee hearing convened to examine passenger and freight rail safety.
Rail shipments of crude oil have soared due to a surge in production brought about by the one-two punch of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. Recent accidents, however, have led public-safety advocates and lawmakers to question rail safety.
Last summer, a train carrying crude oil sourced from North Dakota’s Bakken formation ran off the tracks in Canada, resulting in dozens of fatalities. A similar derailment sparked a massive explosion in Casselton, N.D., at the end of December.
The crude-by-rail safety debate has taken on greater urgency amid speculation that Bakken crude is more volatile than oil sourced from other regions of the country.
All this bad press is prompting regulators and the industry to rush to rail’s defense.
“If the question is, can we move crude by rail safely, the answer is yes,” Ed Hamberger, president and CEO of the American Association of Railroads, said during the hearing. “99.997 percent of the time the product is moved from origin to destination without accidental release.”
Both Szabo and Hamberger agreed, however, that more could be done to shore up safety.
“We owe it to the public to always do better,” Szabo said. “That’s what we expect out of ourselves at FRA, and its what we expect out of the industry that we regulate.”
Last month, DOT and AAR released a series of voluntary safety recommendations that will soon be implemented in an effort to make crude transport via rail safer. The recommendations include slowing train speeds to 40 miles per hour in urban areas designated as “high risk,” as well as increased track inspections.
DOT is also working to finalize a rulemaking that would upgrade safety standards for rail cars most commonly used to haul crude.
- 1 Emails May Be a Key to Addressing ‘Pay-to-Play’ Whispers at Clinton Foundation
- 2 Hillary Clinton’s Potential Senate GOP Partners
- 3 How Black Middle-Class Kids Become Poor Adults
- 4 A Look at Late-Term Abortion Restrictions, State by State
- 5 On the Road for Clinton, Sanders Pushes Ballot Initiatives
What We're Following See More »
Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump 49%-44% in a new CNN/ORC poll out Monday afternoon. But it's Gary Johnson's performance, or lack thereof, that's the real story. Johnson, who had cleared 10% in some surveys earlier this fall, as he made a bid to qualify for the debates, is down to 3% support. He must hit 5% nationwide for the Libertarian Party to qualify for some federal matching funds in future elections.
While the organization praised him for being "perhaps the most pro-LGBT presidential nominee in the history of the Republican Party," the Log Cabin Republicans refused to endorse Donald Trump for president. The organization, which is the largest gay organization in the United States, said that Trump failed to earn its endorsement because he surrounded himself with anti-LGBTQ people "and committed himself to supporting legislation such as the so-called 'First Amendment Defense Act' that Log Cabin Republicans opposes."
Energy Secretary Ernesto Moniz is warning Congress "that Congress and businesses need to act with more urgency to work out a medley of challenges in promoting nuclear power." A number of nuclear plants are currently on track to close around 2030, unless their licenses are extended from 60 years to 80 years, something that could jeopardize the success of the Clean Power Plan. Moniz called on Congress to pass legislation creating interim storage facilities for used nuclear power.
Donald Trump has said he received a $17 million insurance payment in 2005 following Hurricane Wilma, which he claimed did severe damage to his private club in Florida. However, an Associated Press investigation could not find any evidence of the large-scale damage that Trump has mentioned. Additionally, Trump claimed that he transferred some of the $17 million to his personal account thanks to a "very good insurance policy."