Ethics Case Shrouds a GOP Star

Committee will determine whether to investigate McMorris Rodgers further

U.S. Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers
National Journal
Billy House
Add to Briefcase
Billy House
March 23, 2014, 7:56 a.m.

The House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee is set to an­nounce by Monday night wheth­er it will in­vest­ig­ate Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence Chair­wo­man Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers to de­term­ine wheth­er she vi­ol­ated an ob­scure House rule on the way to win­ning a top party lead­er­ship spot.

The 44-year-old from Wash­ing­ton is the No. 4-ranked Re­pub­lic­an lead­er in the House and a rising polit­ic­al star. The bi­par­tis­an Eth­ics Com­mit­tee will likely draw cri­ti­cism if it presses the case — and also if it doesn’t.

“It’s all the more in­ter­est­ing be­cause you have a former mem­ber of her own staff mak­ing the al­leg­a­tions,” said Melanie Sloan, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Cit­izens for Re­spons­ib­il­ity and Eth­ics in Wash­ing­ton.

At the cen­ter of the case is Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s former press spokes­man, Todd Winer, who was on her staff at the time of the lead­er­ship race but now serves as com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for Rep. Raul Lab­rador, an Idaho Re­pub­lic­an. The charges in­volve claims that Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers com­mingled cam­paign and of­fi­cial House funds to win a slim ma­jor­ity in her lead­er­ship race against Rep. Tom Price of Geor­gia in late 2012.

News that the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee was re­view­ing the mat­ter of­fi­cially sur­faced in Feb­ru­ary, just a week after Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers grabbed the na­tion­al spot­light as her party’s choice to give the GOP re­sponse to Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on Ad­dress.

The case was re­ferred in Decem­ber from the in­de­pend­ent Of­fice of Con­gres­sion­al Eth­ics, which con­duc­ted its own re­view.

Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s cur­rent staffers in­sists there was no wrong­do­ing, and her law­yer, El­li­ot Berke, dis­missed the fact that the OCE re­ferred the case. He even took a swipe at the Of­fice of Con­gres­sion­al Eth­ics it­self, sug­gest­ing that “the OCE reg­u­larly refers mat­ters to the House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee for fur­ther re­view” and call­ing it “an un­for­tu­nate rite of pas­sage for many mem­bers of Con­gress.”

“Such re­views are vir­tu­ally auto­mat­ic,” Berke said, “and as the com­mit­tee al­ways points out, do not in­dic­ate that any vi­ol­a­tion has oc­curred, or re­flect any judg­ment on be­half of the com­mit­tee.”

Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s of­fice had no com­ment head­ing in­to Monday.

The OCE’s ini­tial find­ings still have not been made pub­lic, al­though they may be re­leased Monday. Sloan says it re­mains dif­fi­cult for those out­side the in­vest­ig­a­tion to in­de­pend­ently gauge its mer­its.

At the time of the lead­er­ship race, Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers was already the con­fer­ence vice chair, the highest-rank­ing wo­man serving in House GOP lead­er­ship. She also served as the li­ais­on between Mitt Rom­ney’s pres­id­en­tial cam­paign and House Re­pub­lic­ans. But her as­cen­sion to the chair­man­ship was any­thing but as­sured.

Price was then the Re­pub­lic­an Policy Com­mit­tee chair­man — the No. 5 lead­er­ship job — and a former Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee chair­man. He had a deep well of sup­port from con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers of the con­fer­ence.

Dur­ing her cam­paign to win over GOP col­leagues, Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers mailed a pack­et to each of them, tout­ing her role in com­mu­nic­at­ing the con­ser­vat­ive agenda in TV ap­pear­ances and say­ing she “raised over $1,000,000 to the NR­CC, con­trib­uted over $300,000 to can­did­ates, and traveled to 51 con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts in 22 states.”

Winer told in­vest­ig­at­ors that she broke the rule against com­ming­ling cam­paign and of­fi­cial House re­sources. But sources sym­path­et­ic to Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers have sought to de­pict him as a dis­gruntled former em­ploy­ee, who was un­happy about not get­ting the job as the House Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or.

Winer did not re­turn a tele­phone call or an email to dis­cuss the case.

The Eth­ics Com­mit­tee has op­tions in how it handles the case. It could simply drop the mat­ter. Or it could an­nounce that it’s found enough to take its in­quiry to the next level, which would be to em­pan­el a spe­cial in­vest­ig­at­ive sub­pan­el to de­term­ine wheth­er there was a vi­ol­a­tion.

Whatever the out­come, Sloan said that cases like this must be taken ser­i­ously. “This is not just a rite of pas­sage,” she said.

What We're Following See More »
SANS PROOF
NRA Chief: Leftist Protesters Are Paid
21 hours ago
UPDATE
NEW TRAVEL BAN COMING SOON
Trump Still on Campaign Rhetoric
23 hours ago
UPDATE
“WE’RE CHANGING IT”
Trump Rails On Obamacare
1 days ago
UPDATE

After spending a few minutes re-litigating the Democratic primary, Donald Trump turned his focus to Obamacare. “I inherited a mess, believe me. We also inherited a failed healthcare law that threatens our medical system with absolute and total catastrophe” he said. “I’ve been watching and nobody says it, but Obamacare doesn’t work.” He finished, "so we're going to repeal and replace Obamacare."

FAKE NEWS
Trump Goes After The Media
1 days ago
UPDATE

Donald Trump lobbed his first attack at the “dishonest media” about a minute into his speech, saying that the media would not appropriately cover the standing ovation that he received. “We are fighting the fake news,” he said, before doubling down on his previous claim that the press is “the enemy of the people." However, he made a distinction, saying that he doesn't think all media is the enemy, just the "fake news."

FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login