The House Ethics Committee is set to announce by Monday night whether it will investigate Republican Conference Chairwoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers to determine whether she violated an obscure House rule on the way to winning a top party leadership spot.
The 44-year-old from Washington is the No. 4-ranked Republican leader in the House and a rising political star. The bipartisan Ethics Committee will likely draw criticism if it presses the case — and also if it doesn’t.
“It’s all the more interesting because you have a former member of her own staff making the allegations,” said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
At the center of the case is McMorris Rodgers’s former press spokesman, Todd Winer, who was on her staff at the time of the leadership race but now serves as communications director for Rep. Raul Labrador, an Idaho Republican. The charges involve claims that McMorris Rodgers commingled campaign and official House funds to win a slim majority in her leadership race against Rep. Tom Price of Georgia in late 2012.
News that the Ethics Committee was reviewing the matter officially surfaced in February, just a week after McMorris Rodgers grabbed the national spotlight as her party’s choice to give the GOP response to President Obama’s State of the Union Address.
The case was referred in December from the independent Office of Congressional Ethics, which conducted its own review.
McMorris Rodgers’s current staffers insists there was no wrongdoing, and her lawyer, Elliot Berke, dismissed the fact that the OCE referred the case. He even took a swipe at the Office of Congressional Ethics itself, suggesting that “the OCE regularly refers matters to the House Ethics Committee for further review” and calling it “an unfortunate rite of passage for many members of Congress.”
“Such reviews are virtually automatic,” Berke said, “and as the committee always points out, do not indicate that any violation has occurred, or reflect any judgment on behalf of the committee.”
McMorris Rodgers’s office had no comment heading into Monday.
The OCE’s initial findings still have not been made public, although they may be released Monday. Sloan says it remains difficult for those outside the investigation to independently gauge its merits.
At the time of the leadership race, McMorris Rodgers was already the conference vice chair, the highest-ranking woman serving in House GOP leadership. She also served as the liaison between Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign and House Republicans. But her ascension to the chairmanship was anything but assured.
Price was then the Republican Policy Committee chairman — the No. 5 leadership job — and a former Republican Study Committee chairman. He had a deep well of support from conservative members of the conference.
During her campaign to win over GOP colleagues, McMorris Rodgers mailed a packet to each of them, touting her role in communicating the conservative agenda in TV appearances and saying she “raised over $1,000,000 to the NRCC, contributed over $300,000 to candidates, and traveled to 51 congressional districts in 22 states.”
Winer told investigators that she broke the rule against commingling campaign and official House resources. But sources sympathetic to McMorris Rodgers have sought to depict him as a disgruntled former employee, who was unhappy about not getting the job as the House Republican Conference communications director.
Winer did not return a telephone call or an email to discuss the case.
The Ethics Committee has options in how it handles the case. It could simply drop the matter. Or it could announce that it’s found enough to take its inquiry to the next level, which would be to empanel a special investigative subpanel to determine whether there was a violation.
Whatever the outcome, Sloan said that cases like this must be taken seriously. “This is not just a rite of passage,” she said.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.