Israeli officials increasingly are hinting that their country could act alone to attack Iran’s atomic sites, the Associated Press reports.
Recent statements by senior Israeli politicians have raised the profile of their nation’s longstanding threat to strike Iranian nuclear installations, and could signal frustration in Israel with a multilateral dialogue on Tehran’s nuclear program, the news agency reported on Friday. Israel, the United States and several European countries suspect that Iran’s atomic activities could be directed toward arms development, a contention Tehran has denied.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered his nation’s armed forces to maintain readiness in 2014 to potentially take action against Iran’s atomic facilities, according to a Thursday news article in Haaretz. The policy reportedly is slated to cost Israel roughly $2.9 billion this year.
Separately, Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon last week suggested that Washington’s pursuit of negotiations may prompt Israel to act unilaterally against Iran.
Also last week, Israeli General Staff head Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz stressed that Iran “is not in an area that is out of the [Israeli] military’s range.”
According to former Israeli National Security Adviser Yaakov Amidror, such statements are not bluffs.
“We aren’t playing a game of neighborhood bully. This is a stated policy of the state of Israel and has been made clear … to anyone who meets Israel’s representatives,” Amidror said.
Internationally, Israel’s threats have largely fallen on deaf ears in the wake of a November nuclear accord between Iran and six world powers, according to AP. Iran accepted certain atomic restrictions in exchange for curbs on economic sanctions under the six-month deal, which was intended to lay the groundwork for a future long-term plan addressing fears about Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.
Any Israeli military strike on Iran would probably scuttle the talks and prompt an armed backlash, but it is unclear how much damage Israel could independently inflict on its regional rival, the news agency said.
What We're Following See More »
The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.