Maneuvering around last-second snags with some backroom intrigue, House GOP leaders used a voice vote Thursday to pass another temporary patch to prevent a massive cut to doctors’ Medicare payments.
The decision by Republican leaders to circumvent the planned roll-call vote caught many of their own members by surprise.
“They voiced it? Oh, my God,” exclaimed Budget Chairman Paul Ryan as he walked onto the House floor.
Democrats could have opposed the process and demanded a roll-call vote be taken, but House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had given assurances they wouldn’t do that. At the very least, the use of a voice vote does not provide the public with a record of who actually supported the measure and who opposed it.
The bill is now expected to be taken up by the Senate.
Doctors face a 24 percent cut in their Medicare payments Monday if Congress doesn’t act by then. Medicare’s payment formula calls for ever-increasing cuts, which Congress always delays.
The voice vote occurred without fanfare after a series of closed-door meetings between House GOP leaders and some rank-and-file members — including members of the GOP doctors’ caucus who opposed doing another stop-gap fix but were apprised of the voice-vote strategy before it happened.
Doctors groups, such as the American Medical Association, have been lobbying for a permanent change in Medicare’s payment formula rather than the temporary patches Congress always passes.
Adding another hurdle was that Democrats on Thursday morning took to the House floor to denounce the temporary patch in the “doc fix,” or more formally, the Sustainable Growth Rate, in favor of a permanent fix.
“It is unfortunate that we have been put in this position with less than 48 hours notice of what’s in this bill, to do something that all of us knows needs to be done,” House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said.
On Wednesday, Speaker John Boehner had said the deal had been worked out with the Senate to get the measure done.
But with the problems internally within his own caucus, and the opposition of Democrats, the planned process for passing the bill was scrapped. That expedited process would have required two-thirds of the 432-seat House to vote for it, meaning more than 50 of the 199 Democrats would have had to go along, even if all Republicans had supported it.
Throughout the closed-door meetings, Majority Leader Eric Cantor kept saying he remained “confident” that House action would still occur on the measure and that “we are working on it.” The ultimate solution was to hold a voice vote that many members did not realize occurred.
Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., expressed outrage at the process, saying, “I didn’t know it happened. We should be voting.”
Rep. Gerry Connolly D-Va., who vocally voted no, said there wasn’t a request for recorded vote because “there were concerns raised on the Senate side not to do that,” and there was no alternative.
But was this anything other than sneaky? “To quote the House of Cards, ‘You might very well say that, but I cannot comment that,’ ” Connelly said. “I’ve been dying to say that.”
The House passed a $137 billion permanent fix on March 14, which relied on savings tied to the repeal of the Affordable Care Act individual-insurance mandate. But that was rejected by the Democrats who lead the Senate, and it faced a presidential veto threat.
The temporary, smaller bill includes spending offsets from reductions in other Medicare spending; also, some of its costs are paid for by realigning sequester savings set to occur in 2025 to 2024.
Specifically, the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 would prevent the 24 percent cut in reimbursements to doctors who treat Medicare patients by replacing it on April 1 with adoption of a 0.5 percent update through Dec. 1. There would be no percentage changes for the three months following that through April 1, 2015.
Along with extending payments under SGR through March of 2015, the bill also includes funding for various other expiring Medicare provisions.
What We're Following See More »
"The Supreme Court on Monday passed up its two opportunities this term to rule on when and whether states violate the Constitution by drawing electoral maps that sharply favor one political party." In a dispute over Maryland's congressional map, the Supreme Court "upheld a district court judge’s decision not to grant a preliminary injunction" blocking the map. In the Wisconsin case Gill v. Whitford, the justices ruled that Democratic voters lacked standing to challenge the redrawn electoral boundaries at the Supreme Court. Seven justices
"agreed to give the challengers another shot at making their case in the lower courts."
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross failed to keep his promise to divest from his company holdings upon entering government, a Forbes investigation has found. Ross reportedly kept his stakes in companies co-owned by the Chinese government, a firm linked to Vladimir Putin’s inner circle, and a Cyprus bank caught up in the Robert Mueller investigation. Forbes reports that Ross’s family continued to have an interest in these holdings while he dealt with China and Russia in his official role, even while knowing that his family’s fortunes were linked to the countries. Although the arrangements appear to be legal, Forbes says Ross may have broken the law by submitting a sworn statement to officials in November saying he divested of everything he promised he would. His spokesperson said Ross did not lie and has filed amended paperwork.
"The Pentagon has quietly empowered the United States Cyber Command to take a far more aggressive approach to defending the nation against cyberattacks, a shift in strategy that could increase the risk of conflict with the foreign states that sponsor malicious hacking groups." The policy change empowers the command to conduct cyberattacks against adversaries, including "nearly daily raids" against enemy networks and "non-kinetic" attacks against military targets. The purpose of the change, according to policy documents, is to “contest dangerous adversary activity before it impairs our national power" and to impel adversaries to "shift resources to defense and reduce attacks.”
Manuel Padilla, the Border Patrol chief for the Rio Grande Valley, expressed his desire to CBS News for action to be taken to address family separation at the border. Separations have spiked under the Trump Administration's "zero-tolerance" policy. "We created this situation by not doing anything," Padilla said, arguing that previous immigration policy had created a "vacuum" for other families to attempt to cross the border.
"As Trump signed a joint statement with Kim Jong Un that offered few details on how the North Korean leader would make good on his vow to denuclearize, Republicans on Capitol Hill said Tuesday that they want and expect the White House to submit any final agreement for their approval." Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called for any agreement to be in the form of a treaty.