Key U.S. Lawmaker: Special Funding for Nuclear Vessel Won’t Happen This Year

The Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarine USS West Virginia returns in February to Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay, Ga., following routine operations. A key U.S. lawmaker says the nuclear-armed submarines' replacements may get a special funding stream, but not anytime soon.
National Journal
Elaine M. Grossman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elaine M. Grossman
April 29, 2014, 10:26 a.m.

A key U.S. House pan­el lead­er says Con­gress won’t cre­ate a spe­cial fund­ing stream for nuc­le­ar-armed sub­mar­ines this year, but he thinks the idea of bank­rolling the ves­sels out­side of the Navy’s strained ship­build­ing budget is al­most cer­tain in the long term.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive Randy For­bes (R-Va.) told re­port­ers on Tues­day morn­ing that re­pla­cing today’s Ohio-class bal­list­ic-mis­sile ves­sels “is a na­tion­al stra­tegic con­cern” that can­not be al­lowed to fall vic­tim to an already un­der­fun­ded nav­al ship-pro­cure­ment plan in com­ing dec­ades.

That plan, by his es­tim­ates, is $4 bil­lion to $6 bil­lion short an­nu­ally.

Some Navy lead­ers and mem­bers of Con­gress have ad­voc­ated that as a “na­tion­al stra­tegic as­set,” the pur­chase of 12 new “SSBN(X)” sub­mar­ines armed ini­tially with Tri­dent D-5 nuc­le­ar-tipped mis­siles should have its own ded­ic­ated fund­ing source out­side of the ser­vice’s nor­mal budget.

The idea would be to help en­sure that this leg of the U.S. nuc­le­ar tri­ad con­tin­ues to be re­sourced, and is not cut to help fund oth­er Navy pri­or­it­ies in its plan to field 300-plus com­bat ves­sels.

Navy lead­ers have test­i­fied that the Ohio-class re­place­ment pro­gram is their top ship-con­struc­tion pri­or­ity, and they would cut pur­chases of oth­er ves­sels, if need be, to fund the nuc­le­ar-armed sub­mers­ibles. If the Ohio-class re­place­ment sub­mar­ine goes for­ward as planned un­der a single ship­build­ing budget, Navy brass have said they might be able to sus­tain a fleet of just 250 ves­sels.

However, For­bes sees a grow­ing need for U.S. seapower in the Asia-Pa­cific re­gion and around the globe. He said he can’t ima­gine how the Navy could real­ist­ic­ally fund the nuc­le­ar-equipped ves­sels — a pro­gram es­tim­ated at more than $90 bil­lion — and still have funds to buy enough of oth­er classes of re­quired war­ships.

“If you don’t do that [sep­ar­ate-fund­ing scheme], ba­sic­ally we’re go­ing to be tak­ing our en­tire ship­build­ing budget to do that [bal­list­ic-mis­sile sub­mar­ine], and that would be very, very dan­ger­ous for the coun­try,” said For­bes, who chairs the House Armed Ser­vices Seapower and Pro­jec­tion Forces Sub­com­mit­tee.

Speak­ing at a De­fense Writers Group break­fast, he said the pro­spects that Con­gress as a whole would sup­port a spe­cial fund­ing scheme for the “boomer” sub­mar­ines some­time in the fu­ture are “good be­cause I think we’re not go­ing to have a choice.”

For­bes blamed both Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic law­makers, as they re­view and al­ter fed­er­al budgets, for hav­ing typ­ic­ally “reached up and grabbed” de­sired fund­ing num­bers and said “make this fit.” But “on na­tion­al de­fense you can’t do it,” he said.

The Navy es­tim­ates it will need an av­er­age of $16.8 bil­lion an­nu­ally — meas­ured in fisc­al 2013 dol­lars — to un­der­write its 30-year ship­build­ing plan, which is more than $2 bil­lion a year over his­tor­ic av­er­ages, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent Con­gres­sion­al Re­search Ser­vice re­port. The Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice says the Navy plan would ac­tu­ally re­quire $19.3 bil­lion on av­er­age each year, or $2.5 bil­lion more than the ser­vice’s es­tim­ates.

“I don’t think Con­gress is go­ing to want ship­build­ing to stop com­pletely,” For­bes said. “And yet, we’re not go­ing to let the most power­ful ves­sels we have in the world for na­tion­al de­fense not be [built].”

However, he said U.S. le­gis­lat­ors would likely “put it off un­til the last mo­ment,” as they tend to do on many mat­ters of pub­lic policy.

“We’re not there now,” said the law­maker, who has rep­res­en­ted Vir­gin­ia’s 4th Dis­trict since 2001. “I wish I could give you a timetable. I can’t. But I do be­lieve that’s the right thing to do, and we’re go­ing to con­tin­ue to push” the is­sue.

The Navy has re­ques­ted $1.2 bil­lion in SSBN(X) re­search and de­vel­op­ment funds for fisc­al 2015, and plans to be­gin build­ing the first such ves­sel in 2021. It is to be ready for field­ing a dec­ade later.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
2 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
4 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login