Top Cable Lobbyist: Don’t Make the Internet a Utility

The former FCC chairman battles a new push for regulation.

President and CEO of National Cable & Telecommunications Association Michael Powell speaks at the 30th Annual Walter Kaitz Foundation Fundraising Dinner at The New York Marriott Marquis on October 9, 2013 in New York City.
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
Brendan Sasso
April 29, 2014, 1:04 p.m.

Treat­ing high-speed In­ter­net net­works as util­it­ies would strangle their growth, the top lob­by­ist for the cable in­dustry warned Tues­day.

Mi­chael Pow­ell, the head of the Na­tion­al Cable and Tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions As­so­ci­ation, ac­know­ledged the “in­tu­it­ive ap­peal” of ap­ply­ing util­ity-style reg­u­la­tions to In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders. In many ways, the In­ter­net has be­come as cent­ral to our lives as roads and elec­tri­city, he said.

But he ar­gued that gov­ern­ment in­ter­ven­tion has de­graded oth­er ser­vices and would only dampen in­vest­ment in broad­band net­works, lead­ing to slower speeds and less ac­cess.

“The potholes vis­ible through your wind­shield, the shiver you feel in a cold house after a snowstorm knocks out the power, and the wa­ter main breaks along your com­mute should re­strain one from em­bra­cing the il­lus­ory vir­tues of pub­lic-util­ity reg­u­la­tion,” Pow­ell, a former chair­man of the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion dur­ing the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion, said in his speech at NCTA’s an­nu­al show in Los Angeles.

He cited stat­ist­ics show­ing that large por­tions of U.S. roads and bridges are in poor con­di­tion. The wa­ter in­fra­struc­ture needs $1 tril­lion in im­prove­ments, and the elec­tric grid needs $768 bil­lion, Pow­ell said.

“Be­cause the In­ter­net is not reg­u­lated as a pub­lic util­ity, it grows and thrives, watered by private cap­it­al and a light reg­u­lat­ory touch,” he said. His group lob­bies for Com­cast, Time Warner Cable, Charter, Cox, and oth­er cable TV and broad­band In­ter­net pro­viders.

Pow­ell’s com­ments come as an ar­ray of lib­er­al ad­vocacy groups are lob­by­ing the FCC to treat broad­band pro­viders the same way it treats tele­phone util­it­ies.

In 2002, as FCC chair­man, Pow­ell clas­si­fied cable-mo­dem In­ter­net ac­cess as an “in­form­a­tion ser­vice” in­stead of a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.” The move dra­mat­ic­ally han­di­capped the FCC’s abil­ity to reg­u­late high-speed In­ter­net ac­cess.

In Janu­ary, the D.C. Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals struck down the FCC’s con­tro­ver­sial net-neut­ral­ity rules. The reg­u­la­tions, first ad­op­ted in 2010, pro­hib­ited In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders from block­ing web­sites or any “un­reas­on­able” dis­crim­in­a­tion of In­ter­net traffic. The rules were in­ten­ded to en­sure that In­ter­net pro­viders can’t act as “gate­keep­ers” and con­trol what in­form­a­tion people ac­cess on­line.

The court said the FCC was es­sen­tially try­ing to ap­ply a util­ity-style reg­u­la­tion to the In­ter­net. To ad­opt those reg­u­la­tions, the FCC would have to first re­verse Pow­ell’s 2002 de­cision and clas­si­fy broad­band as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice.”

In­stead of re­clas­si­fy­ing, cur­rent FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er (who headed NCTA from 1976 to 1984) is try­ing to re­work the rules un­der the cur­rent au­thor­ity. To com­ply with the court rul­ing, the new rules will have to be looser.

Un­der Wheel­er’s new pro­pos­al, ISPs would still be barred from block­ing web­sites, but they could charge web­sites for faster ser­vice as long as the ar­range­ments are “com­mer­cially reas­on­able.”

Matt Wood, the policy dir­ect­or for ad­vocacy group Free Press, ar­gued that the FCC should re­clas­si­fy broad­band as a “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice” and en­act tough net-neut­ral­ity rules.

“It would put us back on sol­id foot­ing where we’re not pre­tend­ing that broad­band com­mu­nic­a­tions net­works are some­how not com­mu­nic­a­tions net­works,” Wood said.

“Broad­band is es­sen­tial. It’s the open­ing price for par­ti­cip­at­ing today in our eco­nomy and our demo­cracy.”

In a blog post on Tues­day, Wheel­er em­phas­ized that re­clas­si­fy­ing broad­band as a Title II “tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions ser­vice” re­mains on the table.

“If the pro­pos­al be­fore us now turns out to be in­suf­fi­cient, or if we ob­serve any­one tak­ing ad­vant­age of the rule, I won’t hes­it­ate to use Title II,” Wheel­er wrote. 

What We're Following See More »
TALKED ABOUT STRENGTHENING RUSSO-U.S. RELATIONS
Vekselberg Met with Cohen Days Before the Election
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Eleven days before the presidential inauguration last year, a billionaire Russian businessman with ties to the Kremlin visited Trump Tower in Manhattan to meet with Donald J. Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, according to video footage and another person who attended the meeting. In Mr. Cohen’s office on the 26th floor, he and the oligarch, Viktor Vekselberg, discussed a mutual desire to strengthen Russia’s relations with the United States under President Trump, according to Andrew Intrater, an American businessman who attended the meeting and invests money for Mr. Vekselberg."

Source:
HAS DELAYED WHILE INVESTIGATION CONTINUES
Mueller Tells Court He’s Ready for Papadopoulos Sentencing
2 days ago
THE LATEST
COPS A PLEA
Cohen Business Partner to Cooperate with Investigators
3 days ago
THE LATEST
R/E HIS DEMAND
Trump Meeting with Wray and Rosenstein
4 days ago
THE LATEST
TRUMP DEMANDED IT IN TWEET
DOJ Asks Watchdog to Look into Any Infiltration of Trump Campaign
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Justice Department asked its internal watchdog to examine if there was any impropriety in the counterintelligence investigation of President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, after the president demanded Sunday that the department investigate the motives behind the inquiry. Earlier Sunday, in one of a series of tweets targeting the probe into whether Trump associates colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign, Mr. Trump wrote: 'I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!'"

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login