U.S. ‘Not on a Path’ to Help Syrian Rebels Win, Says Dempsey

Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey outlines three things the rebels need to defeat Assad and secure Syria—none of which the U.S. is providing.

A Syrian rebel fighter walks on a dust-covered street in Aleppo following a reported government airstrike on Sunday. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons on Tuesday said it would seek to "establish facts" about claims of chlorine-gas attacks in Syria.
National Journal
Kevin Baron, Defense One
Add to Briefcase
Kevin Baron, Defense One
May 14, 2014, 12:08 p.m.

Joint Chiefs Chair­man Gen. Mar­tin De­mp­sey says the United States is not provid­ing Syr­i­an rebels what they would need to win the war against Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad’s re­gime.

De­mp­sey’s re­marks keep the chair­man — a former di­vi­sion com­mand­er in the Ir­aq war — on fa­mil­i­ar foot­ing, as he leads top Pentagon gen­er­als skep­tic­al of us­ing dir­ect U.S. mil­it­ary force to aid Syr­i­an rebels or oth­er­wise in­ter­vene mil­it­ar­ily in Syr­ia’s fu­ture be­cause of the coun­try’s an­ti­cip­ated long-term se­cur­ity needs after any ini­tial con­flict. De­mp­sey out­lined spe­cific­ally why he be­lieves Syr­ia’s rebels need far more than a res­cue mis­sion.

“They need the force they have now, which is try­ing to pro­tect loc­al vil­lages and try to har­ass the re­gime and level the play­ing field. They need something that even­tu­ally will be able to hold ground. And they need a coun­terter­ror cap­ab­il­ity — all of which is re­spons­ive to Syr­i­ans,” De­mp­sey said Wed­nes­day at the At­lantic Coun­cil, a NATO-ori­ented think tank in Wash­ing­ton,D.C. “And we are not on a path cur­rently to provide that.”

“That’s the con­ver­sa­tion that we need to have,” De­mp­sey said, but not uni­lat­er­ally, in­stead call­ing for coun­tries in the re­gion to face the real­ity of those needs. “It’s Beirut to Dam­as­cus to Bagh­dad,” De­mp­sey said.

From the out­set of Syr­ia’s civil war — des­pite its growth in to a multi-year con­flict claim­ing more than 100,000 lives and dis­pers­ing mil­lions in­to neigh­bor­ing Middle East states — De­mp­sey and seni­or U.S. mil­it­ary lead­ers, in­clud­ing Gen. Ray Odi­erno, Army chief of staff and former com­mand­er of the Ir­aq war, in their ef­forts to pre­pare mil­it­ary op­tions in Syr­ia for Pres­id­ent Barack Obama, have pub­licly ques­tioned the pur­pose of Amer­ic­an troops in Syr­ia after an As­sad de­feat.

In Syr­ia, gov­ern­ment forces have re­gained con­trol of Homs, the coun­try’s third-largest city, where a 2-year siege has res­id­ents feel­ing like the war is over, ac­cord­ing to the Los Angeles Times. Mean­while, France al­leged Syr­ia has con­duc­ted more than one dozen chem­ic­al at­tacks since the United States op­ted against mil­it­ary strikes last fall, and Lakh­dar Brahimi, the top United Na­tions ne­go­ti­at­or on Syr­ia resigned Tues­day, sig­nal­ing the West’s frus­tra­tion at get­ting Syr­ia’s fight­ing fac­tions to­ward any polit­ic­al solu­tion and fears that much more con­flict is likely to come.

“Look, if As­sad took his fam­ily and all of his cronies and de­par­ted Syr­ia today, how does that coun­try — how does it ar­tic­u­late it­self?” De­mp­sey said.

“I’ve heard it de­scribed as a suc­ces­sion of con­flicts. You have the con­flict that cur­rently ex­ists; then there’ll be the second con­flict, which is kind of an in­tern­al con­flict; and then there’ll be the third con­flict against the ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tions that are grow­ing,” he said. “That’s prob­ably right.”

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login