The Crazy ‘Imploding Robot’ Analogy Google Used to Justify Reading Your Email

If a robot reads your diary and then implodes, is it a threat to privacy?

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
May 20, 2014, 10:11 a.m.

Long be­fore Ed­ward Snowden ex­posed how the gov­ern­ment ex­ploits per­son­al data culled by In­ter­net com­pan­ies, pri­vacy ad­voc­ates feared that Google’s meth­ods of min­ing email con­tent was a dis­aster in the mak­ing.

Back in 2004, former Cali­for­nia state Sen. Liz Figueroa wanted to ad­vance le­gis­la­tion that would have al­lowed people the right to opt out of the tar­geted ad­vert­ising Google used in its then-new email ser­vice, Gmail.

No­ti­cing her skep­ti­cism, Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page sat down with Figueroa to dis­cuss her con­cerns about how com­pany bots read emails.

“All of a sud­den, Sergey star­ted talk­ing to me,” Figueroa re­counts in the second in­stall­ment of PBS’s new Front­line doc­u­ment­ary, United States of Secrets. “He said, ‘Sen­at­or, how would you feel if a ro­bot went in­to your home and read your di­ary and read your fin­an­cial re­cords, read your love let­ters, read everything. But be­fore leav­ing the house, it im­ploded.’ “

Brin pro­ceeded to tell Figueroa that such a ro­bot, like Gmail, didn’t vi­ol­ate pri­vacy be­cause “noth­ing’s kept, nobody knows about it.” (Start the clip above at 2:05 to watch the full ex­change.)

Figueroa was shocked by the strange com­par­is­on — and en­tirely un­con­vinced.

“Does that ro­bot know if I’m sad or if I’m feel­ing fear or what’s hap­pen­ing?” she asked Brin. “And he looked and me and said, ‘Oh, no. That ro­bot knows a lot more than that.’ “

Figueroa ul­ti­mately amended her bill, be­liev­ing that Google would not keep the per­son­al in­form­a­tion it col­lec­ted. “Un­be­knownst to me, ul­ti­mately they were go­ing to store the in­form­a­tion,” she ex­plains in the doc­u­ment­ary.

Ten years later, it’s al­most im­possible to es­cape the type of ad-tar­get­ing that Google pop­ular­ized with Gmail, no mat­ter where you go on the In­ter­net. Face­book tracks user be­ha­vi­or to tar­get ads to its more than 1 bil­lion users.

Com­pan­ies like Google for years de­fen­ded their data-col­lec­tion prac­tices and said that it was bey­ond the reach of gov­ern­ment au­thor­it­ies. But leaks sup­plied by Snowden and pub­lished by The Wash­ing­ton Post last Decem­ber re­vealed that the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency has ex­ploited a type of Google “cook­ie” used to track In­ter­net activ­ity for the pur­poses of its own sur­veil­lance. The Snowden files have also ex­posed an NSA pro­gram that secretly broke in­to the serv­ers of nine U.S. In­ter­net com­pan­ies, in­clud­ing Google.

“Gmail was a pri­vacy dis­aster,” Chris Hoofnagle, the dir­ect­or of Berke­ley Cen­ter for Law & Tech­no­logy, told Front­line.

What We're Following See More »
ADDING MOMENTUM
Sen. Corker Yes on Tax Bill
1 days ago
THE LATEST
AFTER CHANGES TO CHILD TAX
Rubio is a Yes on Tax Bill
1 days ago
THE LATEST
VOTE NEXT WEEK
GOP Tax Package Made Public 5:30 p.m.
1 days ago
THE LATEST
“I WELCOME AN OPPORTUNITY TO CLEAR MY NAME”
House Ethics Panel Investigates Rep. Kihuen for Sexual Harassment
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Ethics Committee announced Friday that it has opened an investigation into Rep. Ruben Kihuen. Two women have accused the Nevada Democrat of sexual harassment. Kihuen has welcomed an Ethics investigation, saying in a statement earlier this week, 'I believe in transparency. If Ethics wants to look at it, I welcome an opportunity to clear my name.'"

Source:
INCREASE AMOUNT REFUNDABLE TO $1,400
GOP Changes Child Tax Credit for Rubio’s Vote
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The final Republican tax bill will increase the amount of the refundable Child Tax Credit to $1,400, Rep. Kristi Noem (R-S.D.) told reporters Friday, as leaders seek to win the vote of Sen. Marco Rubio. The refundable amount was $1,100 in the Senate-passed tax bill, but Rubio (R-Fla.) on Thursday said that wasn't good enough. He has threatened to vote against the bill unless the refundable amount of the credit is increased. It's unclear whether the change will be enough to satisfy him."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login