A globalized food system ensures that consumers the world over can purchase virtually any product, reasonably fresh, in any season, anywhere. The costs from such luxuries are usually seen in the form of unequal offshore pay and the environmental impact. But what if those food options are tainted by something a lot more sinister?
New information unearthed in The Guardian suggests that in the long chain of production that shrimp take from Southeast Asia to the American dinner table, slave labor factors in. In summary:
The investigation found that the world’s largest prawn [shrimp] farmer, the Thailand-based Charoen Pokphand (CP) Foods, buys fishmeal, which it feeds to its farmed prawns, from some suppliers that own, operate or buy from fishing boats manned with slaves.
Men who have managed to escape from boats supplying CP Foods and other companies like it told the Guardian of horrific conditions, including 20-hour shifts, regular beatings, torture and execution-style killings. Some were at sea for years; some were regularly offered methamphetamines to keep them going. Some had seen fellow slaves murdered in front of them.
The details get grisly:
Another trafficking victim said he had seen as many as 20 fellow slaves killed in front of him, one of whom was tied, limb by limb, to the bows of four boats and pulled apart at sea.
Furthermore, The Guardian reports, the shrimp which have fed on the feed that was produced in part by slave labor, are purchased by American big-box stores like Wal-Mart and Costco. CP Foods admitted to The Guardian that they know there are problems with their suppliers, but “but to what extent that is, we just don’t have visibility.” And Costco has said it will demand its suppliers police their suppliers.
According to a 2013 U.S. State Department report on human trafficking, although slavery is illegal there, “Thailand is a source, destination, and transit country for men, women, and children subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking.” And “a significant portion of labor trafficking victims within Thailand are exploited in commercial fishing, fishing-related industries, low-end garment production, factories, and domestic work, and some are forced to beg on the streets.”
Concerns over the Thai shrimp industry are not new. Wal-Mart stopped buying shrimp from Narong, another Thai manufacturer, in 2012, presumably over charges that Narong hired underage workers. Thailand produces nearly a third of the shrimp consumed in the United States, for a haul of $1 billion a year.
Ensuring an ethical global supply chain is no small challenge for international companies that also have an interest in keeping down costs. Apple, probably most notoriously, has suffered publicly under reports of unsafe working conditions in its supplier factories in China. Although it’s hard to say that any one shrimp was the direct result of slave labor (it’s implied that CP foods has more than one shrimp-feed supplier), that dark human trafficking economy does touch at the corners of our globalized commercial one. Is that worth the price of cheap shrimp?
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."