The sensible majority is shrinking. According to an important new study by the Pew Research Center, a “growing minority” of partisan Americans doesn’t believe in compromise, and suspects the opposing party is a threat to the nation’s well-being.
The findings beg the chicken-or-the-egg question. Is an increasingly polarized electorate driving political leaders to the extremes? Or is poor leadership and hyperbolic rhetoric driving voters to ideological corners? The answer is most likely “both,” with a wide variety of complicating factors — specifically, the social anxiety that accompanies eras of economic and technological disruption. Key findings:
Hard-core partisans are on the rise. The percentage of Americans who express consistently conservative and consistently liberal opinions has doubled over the past two decades, from 10 percent to 21 percent. Almost four-in-10 politically engaged Democrats are consistent liberals, up from just 8 percent in 1994. A third of Republicans are consistently conservative, up from just 10 percent a decade ago.
They’re also pulling apart. Ideological overlap between the two parties has shrunk. Ninety-two percent of Republicans are to the right of the median Democrat, and 94 percent of Democrats are to the left of the median Republican. Two decades ago, just 64 percent of Republicans were to the right of the median Democrat and only 70 percent of Democrats were to the left of the median Republican.
And they hate each other. The percentage of Republicans who hold a highly negative view of Democrats is 43 percent, up from 17 percent in 1994. Nearly four-in-10 Democrats loathe Republicans, up from 16 percent two decades ago.
Many consider the other side to be an existential threat. More than one-third of Republicans see the Democratic Party as a threat to the nation’s well-being, while 27 percent of Democrats think the same of the GOP.
They run in packs. People with hard-line ideological positions are more likely than others to say that most of their close friends share their view. Pew says partisans are essentially living in “ideological silos.”
And they don’t compromise. A majority of consistent conservatives (57 percent) say the ideal agreement between Obama and GOP lawmakers is one in which Republicans hold out for more of their goals. Consistent liberals are just as stubborn, if not more so: Their preferred terms (favored by 62 percent) end up closer to Obama’s position than the GOP. “At a time of increasing gridlock on Capitol Hill, many on both the left and the right think the outcome of political negotiations between (President) Obama and Republican leaders should be that their side gets more of what it wants,” reads the report.
They’re crowding out the rest of us. The hardened partisan views don’t reflect the majority of Americans, according to Pew.
These sentiments are not shared by all — or even most — Americans. The majority do not have uniformly conservative or liberal views. Most do not see either party as a threat to the nation. And more believe their representatives in government should meet halfway to resolve contentious disputes rather than hold out for more of what they want.
Yet many of those in the center remain on the edges of the political playing field, relatively distant and disengaged, while the most ideologically oriented and politically rancorous Americans make their voices heard through greater participation in every stage of the political process.
And the middle is shrinking. Rating political values on a scale of 1 to 10, Pew found that since 1994 the number of people in the center has shrunk from 49 percent of the public (in 1994 and 2004) to just 39 percent today. That number includes roughly equal numbers of liberal and conservative positions.
What We're Following See More »
"The House on Friday overwhelmingly passed sweeping bipartisan opioid legislation, concluding the chamber’s two-week voteathon on dozens of bills to address the drug abuse epidemic. The measure combines more than 50 bills approved individually by the House focusing on expanding access to treatment, encouraging the development of alternative pain treatments and curbing the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S. It was passed 396-14, with 13 Republicans and one Democrat voting against the package."
In a letter to Congress on Friday, President Trump wrote that he's continuing the national emergency status with respect to North Korea, citing the country's “provocative, destabilizing, and repressive actions," which "continue to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat” to the United States. In a series of tweets following his meeting with Kim Jong-un, Trump said Americans could sleep well at night because North Korea no longer poses a nuclear threat.
"The U.S. Navy is preparing plans to construct sprawling detention centers for tens of thousands of immigrants on remote bases in California, Alabama and Arizona, escalating the military’s task in implementing President Donald Trump’s 'zero tolerance' policy for people caught crossing the Southern border." The document outlines plans for "temporary and austere" internment camps for 25,000 migrants "at abandoned airfields just outside the Florida panhandle," and in Alabama, for 47,000 people near San Francisco, and "as many as 47,000 people at Camp Pendleton" in California. The document estimates that operating a camp to detain 25,000 people for six months would cost approximately $233 million.
"Lasers have targeted pilots of American military aircraft operating over the western Pacific Ocean more than 20 times in recent months," said U.S. officials. The lasers appeared to be coming from Chinese fishing boats in the South China Sea, said the officials, which is the setting of a "long-running dispute between China and Japan over the control of nearby islands ... The incidents likely will come up as part of a broader discussion of issues when Defense Secretary Jim Mattis visits Beijing next week and meets Chinese President Xi Jinping."
"President Donald Trump has unveiled a new policy that depicts the world’s oceans as a resource ripe for expanded business opportunities, reversing the Obama administration's emphasis on protecting 'vulnerable' marine environments." Rather than emphasizing environmental protection, as Obama's policy did, "Trump’s directive speaks mostly to the oceans as a resource for promoting national security" and creating jobs.