Rep. Pete Sessions will challenge Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy in next week’s special election to replace Eric Cantor as majority leader.
Emerging from Thursday’s closed-door luncheon of the Texas GOP delegation, Rep. Joe Barton, a friend of Sessions’, told a throng of reporters: “Pete Sessions is running for majority leader, and I think he will be the next majority leader.”
“He’s going to win,” echoed Rep. John Carter, another Texan.
Sessions’ entrance into the race sets up a head-to-head clash with McCarthy. Sessions, who serves as chairman of the House Rules Committee, has been known to not see eye-to-eye with the current majority whip.
“I am not going to say who is and who isn’t conservative,” Sessions said when asked about McCarthy.
However, the Texan and former chairman of the National Congressional Campaign Committee argued that he’s the conservative who can bridge the House GOP’s internal divide. “Texans, Georgians, Pennsylvanians, I can bring us together,” he said.
McCarthy, whose vote-counting operation was humming as of yesterday morning, starts the contest with a significant lead on Sessions. While McCarthy spent Wednesday hosting colleagues in his office and working them on the House floor, Sessions finalized his bid on Thursday afternoon — after many lawmakers had already departed the Capitol following the final votes of the week.
Sessions does have one factor working in his favor: the size of the Texas delegation. Twenty-four House Republicans hail from the Lone Star state, and Republican sources expect the vast majority of them to back Sessions. In fact, Rep. Michael Burgess said all of the Texans in attendance were rallying behind sessions.
Carter conceded that McCarthy might have a head start. “Roy Blunt told me he had it sewn up, too. But John Boehner is speaker,” Carter said, referring to a bygone GOP leadership race.
One influential Texan who attended the meeting — but can’t vote in next week’s election — was Sen. Ted Cruz. The tea party favorite and potential 2016 presidential candidate told reporters he is staying out of the race.
- 1 Only the Margin Seems in Doubt in the Presidential Race
- 2 The Late-Breaking Democratic House Targets
- 3 Great Democratic Hopes Energize Quiet Faithful in Missouri
- 4 Will Congress Try to Rein in Obamacare Premiums?
- 5 Smart Ideas: Ken Bone Revealed a Serious Policy Divide, and Elizabeth Warren Seeks a Co-Presidency
What We're Following See More »
Twenty-three members of Congress "on Thursday asked the Justice Department to clarify how a looming rule change to the government's hacking powers could impact privacy rights of innocent Americans. The change, due to take place on December 1, would let judges issue search warrants for remote access to computers located in any jurisdiction, potentially including foreign countries. Magistrate judges can normally only order searches within the jurisdiction of their court, which is typically limited to a few counties."
"Hillary Clinton’s campaign announced that her campaign and joint fundraising committees raised $101 million in the first 19 days of October, giving her committees $153 million in cash on hand." Her campaign itself has about $62 million on hand. The campaign said the average donation was $50.
Hillary Clinton appeared on the campaign trail for the first time with Michelle Obama on Thursday night. At the joint appearance in North Carolina, Mrs. Obama said, “When you hear folks talking about a global conspiracy and saying that this election is rigged, understand that they are trying to get you to stay home. They are trying to convince you that your vote doesn’t matter, that the outcome has already been determined and that you shouldn’t even bother to make your voice heard.”
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”