It’s pretty simple, Washington. Your NFL football team’s name insults many Native Americans, which makes it a slur, and the best way to erase the stain is to boycott the team.
Don’t go to the games, sports fans. For members of Congress, lobbyists, and other political MVPs, just say no to the free tickets, box seats, and buffets. You shouldn’t be taking these micro-bribes anyway.
Don’t watch the games. Don’t wear the jerseys. Don’t buy the sponsors’ products. Hit churlish owner Dan Snyder in the pocketbook without treading on the First Amendment. But don’t punt this issue to patent lawyers and bureaucrats. Washington Post sports columnist Sally Jenkins nails it:
Now that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has struck a governmental blow against commodified ethnic insults, I’m nervous, because I may have “disparaged” somebody this morning when I buttered my toast. After I put away the Land O’ Lakes butter with that Indian maiden logo on the box, I bit off a chew of Red Man tobacco and climbed into a Jeep Cherokee.
The Washington football club ought to ditch its slur of a trademark, voluntarily. It ought to do so on the grounds of basic decency and good taste, and, you’d hope, with an intelligent sense of history, context, and place. If they won’t do it willingly, then the rest of us, and the team’s colleagues in the NFL, ought to embarrass, jeer, and cajole them into it. But the method currently being employed, the mobilization of the U.S. government in favor of a correct sensibility, is wrong.
Jenkins quotes a lawyer for the ACLU, Gabe Rottman, warning of the precedent set when a government agency regulates speech, then adds:
You don’t really want government agencies to become the arbiter of acceptable words and images. You really don’t. The main reason you don’t is because, like it or not, what’s offensive is subjective. It creates “a morass of uncertainty,” Rottman wrote. Consider how many offensive violations someone could find in one episode of The Family Guy. Or Game of Thrones, or Orange Is The New Black.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and multiple colleagues have been urging Snyder to change the team’s name for months now.
My colleague Matt Berman points out that the Kennedy administration forced the Washington football team to desegregate — the only NFL team that hadn’t yet done so. Then-owner George Preston Marshall wanted to build a new stadium on federal land in 1961, and the administration gave him an ultimatum: Blacks play on your team or your team doesn’t play in a new stadium.
Using a stadium as leverage is smart. Using the First Amendment as leverage is as dangerous as it is unnecessary, if Washington’s fans and power brokers boycott Snyder. I’ll do my part, no sweat. Your team doesn’t play my Detroit Lions this year.
What We're Following See More »
The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.