Most Americans Haven’t Noticed Budget Cuts

National Journal
Kelsey Snell
See more stories about...
Kelsey Snell
Oct. 9, 2013, 6:29 p.m.

After sweep­ing Re­pub­lic­an vic­tor­ies that threaten to undo much of the Demo­crat­ic agenda, Pres­id­ent Obama could look to an of­ten-over­looked is­sue to build bridges and claim bi­par­tis­an­ship: pending trade agree­ments with South Korea, Panama, and Colom­bia.

Trade does not of­ten fall along tra­di­tion­al party lines, and many of the largest trade agree­ments have moved for­ward with bi­par­tis­an co­oper­a­tion, such as the North Amer­ic­an Free Trade Agree­ment, which was ne­go­ti­ated by Pres­id­ent George H.W. Bush and signed in­to law by Pres­id­ent Bill Clin­ton.

Com­pan­ies search­ing for new mar­kets and in­creased sales are hope­ful that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion can rep­lic­ate the suc­cess in deals ne­go­ti­ated by the George W. Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion with South Korea, Panama, and Colom­bia. Those deals stalled in the face of Demo­crat­ic res­ist­ance, though, over a vari­ety of is­sues, in­clud­ing vi­ol­ence against labor lead­ers in Colom­bia to auto­mobile and beef trade with South Korea.

In re­cent months U.S. Trade Rep­res­ent­at­ive Ron Kirk has been en­gaged in ne­go­ti­ations with Korean of­fi­cials. After the most re­cent round of ne­go­ti­ations wrapped last week, Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials stressed that trade with Korea was a vi­tal pri­or­ity.

“If you go back to the pres­id­ent’s State of the Uni­on, where he talked about doub­ling ex­ports, that in­cludes trade agree­ments and bi­lat­er­al in­vest­ment treat­ies,” John En­gler, pres­id­ent and CEO of the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Man­u­fac­tur­ers, said today. “I think there are a lot of things to work to­geth­er on, trade is one. That really is up to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.”

But En­gler is skep­tic­al of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s will­ing­ness to make trade a mar­quee is­sue. Trade deals with Colom­bia and Panama have been on the table since Obama took of­fice but he has not moved them for­ward. Man­u­fac­tur­ers are look­ing at the pres­id­ent’s pre­vi­ous ac­tion on trade and may lack con­fid­ence in Obama’s will­ing­ness to move for­ward now.

“We’ve done a lot of work in show­ing where we have free-trade agree­ments with the U.S., we have a pos­it­ive bal­ance of trade,” En­gler said. “If he’s ser­i­ous about doub­ling ex­ports, he has to get mov­ing.”

An­oth­er chal­lenge to the con­ven­tion­al wis­dom on trade bi­par­tis­an­ship is the staunch anti-Demo­crat­ic po­s­i­tion Re­pub­lic­ans have taken since Obama took of­fice.

“I don’t have much doubt that someone in the Re­pub­lic­an caucus is go­ing to say ‘we just spent the past two years op­pos­ing Obama on everything and it worked,’” said Wil­li­am Re­insch, pres­id­ent of the Na­tion­al For­eign Trade Coun­cil. “The Re­pub­lic­ans have to de­cide if they gain more by co­oper­at­ing than fight­ing. I don’t think they’re go­ing to im­me­di­ately leap to the con­clu­sion that they should agree.”

But Re­pub­lic­an trade lead­ers, in­clud­ing Reps. Kev­in Brady, R-Texas, and Dave Camp, R-Mich., have been very vo­cal about mak­ing trade a high pri­or­ity in the next Con­gress. Camp is likely to be the new chair­man of the Ways and Means Com­mit­tee, and Brady would be in line to chair that pan­el’s Trade Sub­com­mit­tee.

“Un­der a Re­pub­lic­an House lead­er­ship, if the pres­id­ent is ser­i­ous about mov­ing for­ward on trade, he will have a ser­i­ous part­ner on Cap­it­ol Hill,” Brady said at an Oc­to­ber 25 meet­ing in Wash­ing­ton.

The Novem­ber 11 dead­line for the Korean trade agree­ment set by Obama is fast ap­proach­ing and may give im­me­di­ate signs about how the ad­min­is­tra­tion will move for­ward.

What We're Following See More »
FOLLOWED CLOSED DOOR MEETING
Peña Nieto, Trump Trade Subtle Jabs in Statements
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Following their meeting, President Enrique Peña Nieto of Mexico and Republican nominee for president, Donald Trump, briefly addressed the media, with Peña Nieto subtly rebuking Trump's rhetoric. While he spoke respectfully about Trump, Peña Nieto did not back down, saying that free trade has proved effective and that illegal immigration into America from the south has decreased over the last ten years while the flow of people and drugs into Mexico has increased. Additionally, he stressed that Mexicans in America are "honest" and "deserve respect." Trump responded, calling some Mexicans "tremendous people" while saying others are "beyond reproach." Trump laid out five important issues, including the end of illegal immigration and the ability for either country to build a wall or border. However, Trump said he did not discuss who would pay for the wall.

LOWER COURT RULING STANDS
SCOTUS Won’t Restore NC Voter ID Law
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

A divided Supreme Court "refused Wednesday to reinstate North Carolina’s voter identification requirement and keep just 10 days of early in-person voting. The court rejected a request by Gov. Pat McCrory and other state officials to delay a lower court ruling that found the state law was tainted by racial discrimination."

Source:
SMOKIN’ AND SHOOTIN’
Court: 2nd Amendment Doesn’t Protect Pot Users’ Gun Rights
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS
THE QUESTION
How Many Offices Does Trump Have in Battleground States?
15 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Eighty-eight, according to PBS. Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, has 291 offices in those same 15 states.

Source:
BUT HE’S NOT ADVOCATING FOR IT
Grassley Open to Lame Duck Hearings on Garland
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said Monday he'd now be willing to hold a hearing on Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in a lame-duck session of Congress. While he said he wouldn't push for it, he said if "Hillary Clinton wins the White House, and a majority of senators convinced him to do so," he would soften his previous opposition.

Source:
×