Elizabeth Warren Strikes Back Against New GOP Efforts to Weaken Dodd-Frank

The senator, joined by Obama allies and architects of the financial regulations, are slamming the House’s proposed budget.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) listens to testimony from witnesses during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on 'Mitigating Systemic Risk Through Wall Street Reforms,' on Capitol Hill, July 11, 2013 in Washington, D.C.
Eric Garcia
Add to Briefcase
Eric Garcia
March 18, 2015, 8:07 a.m.

The White House, former Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials, and Sen. Eliza­beth War­ren are cri­ti­ciz­ing at­tempts to weak­en the Dodd-Frank fin­an­cial-re­form law in House Re­pub­lic­ans’ pro­posed budget, set­ting the stage for a policy fight that’s only just be­gin­ning.

The budget, re­leased on Tues­day, would put the Con­sumer Fin­an­cial Pro­tec­tion Bur­eau un­der con­gres­sion­al ap­pro­pri­ation, which crit­ics say could res­ult in few­er funds for the bur­eau, since Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress would con­trol how much money it re­ceives.

War­ren, a Demo­crat from Mas­sachu­setts who served as an as­sist­ant in set­ting up the Con­sumer Fin­an­cial Pro­tec­tion Bur­eau be­fore she ran for Sen­ate, said the House GOP budget could com­prom­ise the agency’s in­de­pend­ence.

“The con­sumer agency has put in place strong rules to pro­tect con­sumers from tricks and traps in fin­an­cial products,” War­ren said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al Tues­day night. “The big banks don’t like that—and that’s the num­ber one reas­on the CFPB should re­main free of polit­ic­al in­flu­ence.”

The White House joined War­ren in its cri­ti­cism, say­ing that put­ting the bur­eau un­der the ap­pro­pri­ation of Con­gress would lim­it the agency. The ad­min­is­tra­tion also cri­ti­cized the Re­pub­lic­ans budget pro­pos­al’s “cre­at­ive-ac­count­ing sav­ings” that shift fund­ing for the agency to ap­pro­pri­ations.

“In ad­di­tion, it risks re­turn­ing us to the days of ‘too big to fail,’ pro­tect­ing Wall Street firms from im­port­ant reg­u­lat­ory safe­guards and put­ting or­din­ary cit­izens and the eco­nomy at risk,” the White House said in a fact sheet Tues­day even­ing.

War­ren and the White House’s united front against the Re­pub­lic­an pro­pos­al once again shows the com­plex re­la­tion­ship the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has with the sen­at­or, a pro­gress­ive fa­vor­ite. Obama and War­ren are at odds about parts of the pro­posed Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship, but both were sup­port­ive of fin­an­cial re­form on Wall Street.

The House budget also would scrap what’s known as the Or­derly Li­quid­a­tion Au­thor­ity, a pro­vi­sion that gives the Fed­er­al De­pos­it In­sur­ance Cor­por­a­tion, the in­de­pend­ent agency cre­ated dur­ing the Great De­pres­sion meant to main­tain sta­bil­ity of the U.S. fin­an­cial sys­tem, the power to as­sume op­er­a­tion­al and fin­an­cial con­trol of a troubled fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tion con­sidered sys­tem­ic­ally im­port­ant. In that role, it has the re­spons­ib­il­ity to merge, sell, and man­age the in­sti­tu­tion’s as­sets, as well provide money ne­ces­sary to bring an or­derly end to the troubled in­sti­tu­tion.

Re­pub­lic­ans say cut­ting this pro­vi­sion pre­vents tax­pay­ers from be­ing on the hook for bail­outs of fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions be­hav­ing badly. But the White House struck back on Tues­day, say­ing, while Re­pub­lic­ans claim the budget does not rely on gim­micks or “cre­at­ive-ac­count­ing tricks,” the sav­ings made by get­ting rid of the pro­vi­sion would be both.

“[The Or­derly Li­quid­a­tion Au­thor­ity] was en­acted to en­sure tax­pay­er funds are nev­er again used to bail out ‘too big to fail’ fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions,” the White House fact sheet said.

Mi­chael Barr, a law pro­fess­or at the Uni­versity of Michigan who served as the Treas­ury De­part­ment’s as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary for fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions, said re­mov­ing the Or­derly Li­quid­a­tion Au­thor­ity would re­in­force the concept of too-big-to-fail fin­an­cial in­sti­tu­tions.

“One of the key fea­tures is giv­ing the gov­ern­ment the abil­ity to wind down a firm like Leh­man Broth­ers if it gets in trouble,” he said, re­fer­ring to one of the in­sti­tu­tions whose col­lapse was part of the 2008 fin­an­cial crisis.

Re­pub­lic­ans have pre­vi­ously used spend­ing bills and oth­er must-sign le­gis­la­tion to weak­en parts of Dodd-Frank, know­ing it would be dif­fi­cult for Demo­crats to vote against them. But in this case, the White House and pro­gress­ive Demo­crats like War­ren are draw­ing lines in the sand, vow­ing to stop ma­jor parts of Dodd-Frank from be­ing weakened or re­pealed.

What We're Following See More »
FOSTER FREISS TO MAKE ANNOUNCEMENT TODAY
GOP Megadonor Running For Governor In Wyoming
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Republican megadonor Foster Friess has told party leaders in Wyoming that he plans to run for governor," and is expected to make an announcement this afternoon. Friess has donated "millions of dollars to Republican candidates and causes over the last decade, according to federal campaign finance records," including over "$1.7 million to boost Santorum's [presidential] campaign" in 2016. Gov. Matt Mead (R) is term-limited, and "a handful of Republicans are running in an open primary to succeed him in one of the reddest states in the country."

Source:
DEATH TOLL REACHES 38
Israeli Army Kills Four Palestinian Protestors
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

Four Palestinian protestors have been killed by Israeli fire near the Gaza-Israel border, bringing the death toll to 38, in what marks the "fourth consecutive week of Gaza's March of Return mass protests." The marches are part of a "month-and-a-half-long protest organized by Hamas near the border fence," which organizers have said will not stop before May 15. The marches are intended to emulate anti-apartheid protests in South Africa, and to commemorate the forced expulsion of Palestinians from their homes in 1948, during the establishment of the State of Israel.

Source:
NO TIMELINE SET
McCabe To Sue For Wrongful Termination, Defamation
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe is looking to sue for defamation, wrongful termination and other possible civil claims, his lawyer told reporters Friday." McCabe's attorney Michael Bromwich said that his team "hasn't managed to find any witnesses to corroborate McCabe's version of the story," although they have not had enough time to do so. "McCabe’s lawyers are also seeking ways to release the emails between McCabe and Comey, which would offer insight into their communication about the leaks to the Wall Street Journal."

Source:
SEEKS COMPENSATORY DAMAGES
DNC Files Sweeping Lawsuit Over 2016 Election
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Democratic National Committee filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit Friday against the Russian government, the Trump campaign and the WikiLeaks organization alleging a far-reaching conspiracy to disrupt the 2016 campaign and tilt the election to Donald Trump. The complaint, filed in federal district court in Manhattan, alleges that top Trump campaign officials conspired with the Russian government and its military spy agency to hurt Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and help Trump by hacking the computer networks of the Democratic Party and disseminating stolen material found there." The DNC is seeking "millions of dollars in compensation to offset damage it claims the party suffered from the hacks," and is arguing the cyberattack" undermined its ability to communicate with voters, collect donations and operate effectively as its employees faced personal harassment and, in some cases, death threats."

Source:
BIGGEST FINE OF TRUMP ERA
Wells-Fargo Fined $1 Billion For Defrauding Customers
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have fined Wells Fargo $1 billion dollars for convincing customers to buy insurance they did not need, and could not afford. "In October, the bank revealed that some mortgage borrowers were inappropriately charged for missing a deadline to lock in promised interest rates, even though the delays were Wells Fargo's fault." The bank has also apologized for . "charging as many as 570,000 clients for car insurance they didn't need," and found that about 20,000 of those customers "may have defaulted on their car loans and had their vehicles repossessed in part because of those unnecessary insurance costs."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login