Barack Obama’s New Trade Lobbyist

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is in Washington to talk trade.

US President Barack Obama accompanies Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe during a visit to Lincoln Memorial on April 27, 2015 in Washington,DC.
National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
Add to Briefcase
George E. Condon Jr.
April 28, 2015, 1 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama is likely to be smil­ing when Ja­pan­ese Prime Min­is­ter Shinzo Abe goes to Cap­it­ol Hill on Wed­nes­day—something he def­in­itely didn’t do one of the last times a for­eign lead­er spoke be­fore Con­gress.

Back in March, Is­raeli Prime Min­is­ter Ben­jamin Net­an­yahu warned Con­gress, “Don’t be fooled” by the pres­id­ent, and he lob­bied against the White House’s ef­forts to work out a nuc­le­ar agree­ment with Ir­an. Now, 55 days later, on an­oth­er con­tro­ver­sial is­sue—trade—Abe steps for­ward as an im­port­ant ally lob­by­ing for an Obama deal.

With the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­quest for Trade Pro­mo­tion Au­thor­ity hanging in the bal­ance, the White House sees Abe’s vis­it—and his in­ter­ven­tion with Con­gress—as com­ing at a key mo­ment, even as the United States and Ja­pan struggle to wrap up their parts in the ne­go­ti­ations on the Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship, a 12-na­tion free-trade deal.

“I don’t think Abe will re­peat the per­form­ance of the pre­vi­ous guest,” said Sheila A. Smith, seni­or fel­low for Ja­pan Stud­ies at the Coun­cil on For­eign Re­la­tions. “That’s not at all in his in­terests, and I don’t think he is in­clined to identi­fy Ja­pan­ese in­terests as be­ing di­ver­gent from our ad­min­is­tra­tion’s.” She pre­dicted Abe will “make a strong case” for TPP and will “try to sell TPP to those con­gress­men and wo­men who re­main a little bit on the fence.”

Oth­er ana­lysts agree. “This is not a Net­an­yahu mo­ment,” Shi­hoko Goto, a seni­or as­so­ci­ate in the Wilson Cen­ter’s Asia Pro­gram, told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “With TPP, Ja­pan wants to move for­ward. Amer­ica wants to move for­ward. It is good for both coun­tries. It is good for Asia. It is good for the world, and that’s what he wants to talk about.”

What this speech doesn’t have is the same buildup as Net­an­yahu’s, whose ap­pear­ance was marked by con­tro­versy over the pro­tocol of the in­vit­a­tion and hyped fur­ther by sub­sequent boy­cotts. But while Abe’s speech won’t have nearly the same na­tion­al im­pact, the White House hopes his per­son­al ap­peal is enough to nudge a few more mem­bers to ap­pre­ci­ate the eco­nom­ic be­ne­fits of the trade deal.

The fact is, for the White House, TPP re­mains a tough sell in Con­gress where most of the pres­id­ent’s own party is abandon­ing him on the is­sue.

At the same time, the TPP ne­go­ti­ations are stalled over the last re­main­ing obstacles—the tar­iffs pro­tect­ing Ja­pan­ese farm­ers and Amer­ic­an pro­tec­tions for U.S. trucks and autos. In an in­ter­view with The Wall Street Journ­al re­leased Monday, Obama ac­know­ledged the stick­ing points will prob­ably pre­vent a deal from be­ing fi­nal­ized while Abe is in Wash­ing­ton.

“Ne­go­ti­ations are tough on both sides be­cause he’s got his own polit­ics and in­terests,” said Obama. “Ja­pan­ese farm­ers are tough, Ja­pan­ese auto­makers want cer­tain things. I don’t ex­pect that we will com­plete all ne­go­ti­ations” this week. Though he ad­ded that the “parties (are) much closer to­geth­er.”

Abe has cham­pioned TPP from the start, push­ing it hard on his first vis­it to Wash­ing­ton after his elec­tion in 2013—even though he has his own do­mest­ic crit­ics, in­clud­ing Ja­pan­ese farm­ers who do not want to lower the tar­iffs that pro­tect them from U.S. com­pet­i­tion. That is one reas­on why the con­gres­sion­al dis­pute over trade is big news in Ja­pan. “The Ja­pan­ese are watch­ing our de­bate here,” said Smith. “They are try­ing to gauge wheth­er we are well po­si­tioned to move for­ward.”

The speech to a joint meet­ing of Con­gress—the first ever by any Ja­pan­ese prime min­is­ter—will be the high­light of what is an ex­traordin­ar­ily long U.S. vis­it by Abe. It star­ted Monday in Bo­ston and fea­tured an un­sched­uled vis­it with Obama to the Lin­coln Me­mori­al later in the day. Tues­day, Abe will get the most pomp and ce­re­mony a White House can de­liv­er, with a full form­al ar­rival ce­re­mony on the South Lawn, talks in the Oval Of­fice dur­ing the day, and a State Din­ner in the even­ing. Then, it’s to Con­gress on Wed­nes­day be­fore leav­ing for New York and, later in the week, to Cali­for­nia.

The breadth of his sched­ule is de­signed to show the depth of Ja­pan-U.S. ties even as both coun­tries mark the 70th an­niversary of Ja­pan’s sur­render to con­clude World War II. And to both gov­ern­ments, noth­ing says that those hos­til­it­ies are long gone more than the deep­er eco­nom­ic ties sym­bol­ized by the TPP and the deep­er mil­it­ary ties dis­cussed on Monday.

Both sides con­tend the two lead­ers have a good re­la­tion­ship—cer­tainly a con­trast with the Obama-Net­an­yahu fric­tion. An of­fi­cial in the Ja­pan­ese Em­bassy privately boas­ted that they en­joy an easy com­pat­ib­il­ity that al­lows them to use first names in their meet­ings. That re­calls the days of the “Ron and Yasu” show, star­ring Pres­id­ent Ron­ald Re­agan and Prime Min­is­ter Yas­uhiro Na­kasone. But it still falls short of last dec­ade, when Pres­id­ent George W. Bush de­lighted his Elvis-lov­ing coun­ter­part by tak­ing Prime Min­is­ter Ju­nichiro Ko­i­zumi to Grace­land.

“On the per­son­al re­la­tion­ship, this isn’t as good as Bush and Ko­i­zumi,” said Goto. “You know Obama—this is as pas­sion­ate as he’s go­ing to get.”

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
3 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
3 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login