The House Is Suing Obama Over an Obamacare Change It Likes

One of the two administrative actions in question delayed the law’s employer mandate”“which the House voted itself to do.

President Barack Obama talks with Speaker of the House, John Boehner, R-Ohio, during a meeting with the bipartisan, bicameral leadership of Congress in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, September 9, 2014. President Obama will speak to the nation September 10, about the strategy White House intends to implement to counter the jihadist Islamic state. AFP PHOTO / Jim WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Dylan Scott
Add to Briefcase
Dylan Scott
May 26, 2015, 4 p.m.

The Af­ford­able Care Act is head­ing back to the courts yet again this week, as the House Re­pub­lic­an law­suit chal­len­ging the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ex­ec­ut­ive changes to the law will get a hear­ing Thursday at a fed­er­al dis­trict court in Wash­ing­ton.

The largely un­pre­ced­en­ted law­suit, which has since been fol­lowed by threats of more House lit­ig­a­tion against Pres­id­ent Obama’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions on im­mig­ra­tion, has had a bumpy road. House Speak­er John Boehner went through two at­tor­neys be­fore fi­nally find­ing a third that stuck, with re­ports that the first two dropped out after pres­sure from their oth­er cli­ents.

But now it is get­ting a day in court. Judge Rose­mary Colly­er of the U.S. Dis­trict Court for the Dis­trict of Columbia will hear ar­gu­ments on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s mo­tion to dis­miss the law­suit, which al­leges that the House doesn’t have leg­al stand­ing to sue at all.

The weird­est thing about the whole case, though, is: the House ac­tu­ally agrees with one of the ad­min­is­trat­ive changes—at least the un­der­ly­ing policy.

Re­pub­lic­ans are su­ing over two spe­cif­ic ad­min­is­trat­ive ac­tions taken by the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment: Pay­ing cost-shar­ing sub­sidies to in­surers that help people with the low­est in­comes without the fund­ing be­ing ap­pro­pri­ated by Con­gress and uni­lat­er­ally delay­ing the em­ploy­er man­date’s pen­al­ties for one year.

But the House has voted more than once to post­pone the em­ploy­er man­date for a year, some­times on its own, some­times in tan­dem with the in­di­vidu­al man­date. So the GOP isn’t ar­guing that it op­poses the delay, just that the way it was done was il­leg­al.

“We are fo­cus­ing spe­cific­ally on ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions re­lat­ing to the Af­ford­able Care Act, but don’t lose sight of the crit­ic­al im­port­ance of these is­sues at the core of our rep­res­ent­at­ive demo­cracy,” Rep. Peter Roskam, chair­man of a Ways and Means sub­pan­el said at a hear­ing last week. “The ques­tion be­fore us is not wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion is im­ple­ment­ing the health care law. It’s wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion is un­der­min­ing the rule of law. And the an­swer is yes.”

“It’s not about health care,” Pennsylvania Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mike Kelly ad­ded more suc­cinctly. “It’s about the health care of our Con­sti­tu­tion.”

That’s the tightrope that con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans have been walk­ing since Ju­ly 2013, when the ad­min­is­tra­tion first an­nounced it would delay the man­date. Just a few days after HHS said the man­date wouldn’t ap­ply in 2014 as planned, Rep. Tim Griffin of Arkan­sas in­tro­duced a bill to do the same thing. The House passed the bill, but the Demo­crat­ic-led Sen­ate nev­er took it up.

“The White House may be­lieve it can uni­lat­er­ally delay im­ple­ment­a­tion of Obama­care’s em­ploy­er man­date, but only Con­gress can change the law,” Griffin said in a state­ment then.

And that’s been the con­ser­vat­ive po­s­i­tion ever since.

Boehner noted in a Novem­ber op-ed ex­plain­ing the law­suit that the House had “passed le­gis­la­tion to ad­dress this prob­lem.” But, he wrote, “there must be ac­count­ab­il­ity” for the ad­min­is­tra­tion al­legedly cir­cum­vent­ing the Con­sti­tu­tion. His al­lies re­it­er­ated that po­s­i­tion last week.

“There have been nu­mer­ous in­stances when the ad­min­is­tra­tion has made what many mem­bers of Con­gress con­sider to be good changes to the law, but not with­in the stat­utory au­thor­ity,” Grace-Mar­ie Turn­er, founder of the con­ser­vat­ive Ga­len In­sti­tute health-care think tank, told mem­bers at the over­sight hear­ing. She cited the em­ploy­er-man­date delay spe­cific­ally.

“We can agree that the policy res­ult “¦ that the bur­den on em­ploy­ers should be lim­ited, but the law doesn’t give the ad­min­is­tra­tion that kind of flex­ib­il­ity without Con­gress, cor­rect?” North Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­an George Hold­ing asked one of oth­er wit­nesses at the hear­ing. (The wit­ness af­firmed that in­ter­pret­a­tion).

The ad­min­is­tra­tion ar­gues that the delay is with­in its dis­cre­tion when im­ple­ment­ing the law and, moreover, the House doesn’t have leg­al stand­ing to chal­lenge the change, any­way. It as­serts that con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans are barred by the Con­sti­tu­tion’s sep­ar­a­tion of powers from su­ing and that they have oth­er non-li­ti­gi­ous means, such as the power of the purse, to coun­ter­act HHS.

The Justice De­part­ment’s law­yers, who are rep­res­ent­ing HHS, haven’t raised the point about the House ap­prov­ing the same policy in its briefs, but a “seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial” made sure to note the irony to CNN shortly after Boehner an­nounced the forth­com­ing law­suit in Ju­ly.

“If le­gis­la­tion is needed, I’m not sure I agree that it is, but if le­gis­la­tion is needed and the polit­ic­al pro­cess can’t provide it, then I think that’s a fail­ure of the polit­ic­al pro­cess,” Robert Wein­er, a former Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion at­tor­ney, said when asked about the bills that the House had passed that align with the ad­min­is­trat­ive changes but non­ethe­less earned veto threats from the White House. “But I don’t think it means we should go to lit­ig­a­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
SAYS HIS DEATH STEMMED FROM A FISTFIGHT
Saudis Admit Khashoggi Killed in Embassy
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Saudi Arabia said Saturday that Jamal Khashoggi, the dissident Saudi journalist who disappeared more than two weeks ago, had died after an argument and fistfight with unidentified men inside the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul. Eighteen men have been arrested and are being investigated in the case, Saudi state-run media reported without identifying any of them. State media also reported that Maj. Gen. Ahmed al-Assiri, the deputy director of Saudi intelligence, and other high-ranking intelligence officials had been dismissed."

Source:
ROGER STONE IN THE CROSSHAIRS?
Mueller Looking into Ties Between WikiLeaks, Conservative Groups
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation is scrutinizing how a collection of activists and pundits intersected with WikiLeaks, the website that U.S. officials say was the primary conduit for publishing materials stolen by Russia, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Mueller’s team has recently questioned witnesses about the activities of longtime Trump confidante Roger Stone, including his contacts with WikiLeaks, and has obtained telephone records, according to the people familiar with the matter."

Source:
PROBING COLLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION
Mueller To Release Key Findings After Midterms
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Special Counsel Robert Mueller is expected to issue findings on core aspects of his Russia probe soon after the November midterm elections ... Specifically, Mueller is close to rendering judgment on two of the most explosive aspects of his inquiry: whether there were clear incidents of collusion between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, and whether the president took any actions that constitute obstruction of justice." Mueller has faced pressure to wrap up the investigation from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, said an official, who would receive the results of the investigation and have "some discretion in deciding what is relayed to Congress and what is publicly released," if he remains at his post.

Source:
PASSED ON SO-CALLED "SAR" REPORTS
FinCen Official Charged with Leaking Info on Manafort, Gates
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS
"A senior official working for the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has been charged with leaking confidential financial reports on former Trump campaign advisers Paul Manafort, Richard Gates and others to a media outlet. Prosecutors say that Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards, a senior adviser to FinCEN, photographed what are called suspicious activity reports, or SARs, and other sensitive government files and sent them to an unnamed reporter, in violation of U.S. law."
Source:
FIRST CHARGE FOR MIDTERMS
DOJ Charges Russian For Meddling In 2018 Midterms
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Justice Department on Friday charged a Russian woman for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere with the 2018 U.S. election, marking the first criminal case prosecutors have brought against a foreign national for interfering in the upcoming midterms. Elena Khusyaynova, 44, was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. Prosecutors said she managed the finances of 'Project Lakhta,' a foreign influence operation they said was designed 'to sow discord in the U.S. political system' by pushing arguments and misinformation online about a host of divisive political issues, including immigration, the Confederate flag, gun control and the National Football League national-anthem protests."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login